18

Blogs

Blog

What would happen if parents in China found out that their 11 year old daughter was having sex? Until the corruption of morals began in England in the 1960's such a child would have been removed from her parents care and taken into a children's home, or some other approved institution, until a suitable foster family could be found. Now the stigma has been removed from children who enter into sexual activities at young ages, it is becoming more and more common place in western countries such as the US and UK. A story has appeared in the UK news of a girl aged 12, who has just had a baby with her 13 year old boyfriend. Such children instead of feeling shame are given a celebrity status among their peers. Can a 12 year old girl and her 13 year old boyfriend take care of a baby, can they support it and help teach it social morals and social skills, can they help with its education at an age when most western girls would once have been playing with dolls? Of course not. Until the liberalisation of child care in the UK due to "Political Correctness, (PC)" when a Child, social service would arrange adoption of the baby so it had a better chance of a good life than it would with a child of 12 for a parent. This was good for the baby and good for the child that had given birth to it. The juvenile could continue with its education and the baby would not start life at such a disadvantage. PC causes social services do all they can at the tax payer's expense to ensure the child has support in caring for their baby. This is because they see the rights of the child who has just had a baby as more important than the law and the government supports this view. They never think how the right of the child mother will affect the baby's life in the long term. This case demonstrates what actually happens. This is how western media report the story: "The couple, who are said to be 'totally in love', met over Christmas 2012 when she was ten and he was 12. She is now in Year 7, and her boyfriend, who also cannot be named, is in Year 9 at another school..."How romantic it sounds as children learn of the story and talk about it at such an impressionable age, this is irresponsible reporting. Now let's look at what the parents have to say about their little girl who has just become a mother, "Speaking exclusively to LBC radio, the girl's father, known as Greg, admitted that he was heartbroken by the situation, but insisted that he did not know his daughter was sexually active at 11 and only found out about the pregnancy a month ago. He said: "Unfortunately kids at this age are going to grow up and have boyfriends and partners. If they do things behind their parents' back that's something that we are never going to find out. "It is heartbreaking, but you can't turn back time. You can only go forwards. "We don't know where it happened. What you're implying is that we knew they were having sexual intercourse in bedrooms. No. "We cannot keep her wrapped up her whole life. I can't keep a watch on her 24-hours a day, seven days a week. "You don't know what has gone on and once the mistake has been made, you just have to support them. "That little girl has not brought shame to me at all. I am so proud of her."It is amazing that he is proud of his daughter who became a mother at 12, he feels no shame and makes excuses for his bad parenting. This child clearly comes from a home with irresponsible parents. In china parents always know where their children are. I always knew where my daughters were and I am from the same country as this rather bad father. So why do you think he is such a bad father? Here's the reason: "On Tuesday the girl went to register the child's birth with her mother, who is 27 and is also now one of Britain's youngest grandmothers."Let just do our sums quickly, 27 minus 12 is 15. So the girls mother gave birth to her when she was also a child at school. So the child who had a baby at school has seen her own daughter have a baby at an even younger age and make her a very young Grandmother. This family will be as proud of that fact as they are of their little girl who has just had the baby. It will bring them a certain kudos and money.It is a fact that in western societies, where parents who exercise good parental control are seen as denying the child's right to do as it pleases, school children are having babies younger and younger, despite the fact it is against the law for someone under the age of 16 to engage in a sexual act with another person in the UK. If the law was upheld this baby would not be brought up by a family with a clear history of under age sex, it would be adopted and have a better chance in life.Socail services in the uk and other organisation will do all they can to ensure this girl now gets VIP treatment for the sake of herself and her baby as they would have had a duty to do for the girls own mother. And so we see the cycle of school girl parent progress through another generation of this family. This is a disgrace. No one has really thought of the baby's life and how this will certainly affect the baby. How can such a mother lecture her own daughter about not having underage sex when the mother and grand mother have both given birth before they were legally old enough to have sex? The simple answer is they can't and they don't have the parenting skills to help this baby. The baby is condemned to a life of dysfunction because of a family history which will be repeated in the next generation. How sad, yet easily preventable if this cycle is broken and the law enforced.This is not an isolated incident, it is becoming more and more common. Social workers should step in and do something to prevent this and protect the babies interests, but they won't because the baby has no voice and this has happened before in this family and many others. Social workers among the worst parents I have ever encountered in the west. One social worker I know personally from the town of Great Yarmouth had a 13 year old son who was openly taking drugs and dealing them to his school mates with his mother's full knowledge, he was also having sex in the family home with a girl of 12. and dear social worker mother never stopped them. Once the poor girl became pregnant the social worker's son wanted no more to do with her and moved on to the next victim. Clearly social workers who let their own children act in these ways will be of no use to this poor baby, which is condemned because of the circumstances of its birth just as those born into wealthy and powerful families are destined to have and advantage over more capable people who come from less advantages families despite being more capable then most of their leaders.Curcumstances of birth are a two edged sword. How sad it is for those who are disadvantaged because of birth and those who are unfit are advantaged because of circumstances of birth.

2

Watchdog to probe hotel fundingPress Association – 3 hours ago Copied at 11:10 12/04/14View PhotoPress Association - The Palace of Westminster.Claims that taxpayers' money was used to pay for a hotel suite at the Conservative party conference that was allegedly used for a gay orgy will be looked into by the expenses watchdog.Rooms costing up to £2,500 a night at Manchester's Light ApartHotel were booked by the Policy Research Unit, which provides parliamentary research for the Tory MPs, according to the Independent.Most of the PRU's funding comes from public money as a result of payments from Tory MPs of around £4,000 each through their expenses.Concerns were raised with senior Tory officials after gay app Grindr was used to "advertise" a sex party during the Conservative Party conference in 2011, according to the Independent.The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority played down suggestions it will launch an investigation but said it will look into whether public funds have been used for political purposes. Any activities involving consenting adults in the rooms will not form part of the inquiries of the watchdog as its remit concerns the use of public money.A spokesman said: " MPs are not allowed to claims costs which go to party political activities. If there are suggestions that that may have happened, we would want to look into it."Not only is the UK government full of fraudsters it, they also use public money to fund their commonly shared sexual practises. China is a much better place with a much better government than most other countries. We can see why David Cameron pushed through law to allow gay marriage in the UK despite opposition form most of the people of the UK and members of his own criminal gang.

2

The criminal former Culture Secretary Maria Miller has reigned after more than a week of being supportted by other Criminal MPs in the UK. She was given thousands of pounds of taxpayers money when she resigned and will no doubt go to work for one of the multi-nationals whose interests our criminal MPs serve at the expense of our nation and national economy. When a worker steals from his or her employee in the UK and most other countries, they get sacked (dismissed). If England was really a democracy. Ms Miller would have been sacked and now be facing a criminal prosecution for her crimes against the Taxpayers, who are actually her employers that she has stolen from. But instead because corruption in the UK in now endemic the other criminals in parliament protected her, because they know if they don't protect her they could be the next ones to go. She will not face a criminal trial because those in power fear if she is put on trial so might they be.When a government that is supposed to represent the people places itself above the law it becomes a dictatorship and in England we have had a dictatorship for more than thirty years. The party holding the title of Prime Minister might change, but there is no real difference. The war criminal Tony Blair should be on trial for his war crimes, But he left office as the richest Prime Minister in our history, He was not rich when he became Prime Minister, During his time he was involved in many immoral and illegal deals and the same is true of those who have followed him. And all because of the traitor Margaret Thatcher, who left parliament as the most hated Prime Minister in our history to date. The problem was caused because the English fell for the American dream of riches for everyone, when in truth if everyone was rich money would have no value and all would be poor. Before Thatcher any MP who broke the law or abused their position of power would have been dealt with harshly as an example to others. But now the corrupt hold the keys to our nation and they no longer enter politics because of some sense of social duty, but to get rich.Democracy is dead when the government stops listening to the people, The People of the UK did not want Homosexual marriage to be legalised, But Cameron did so now against the wishes of the majority men can marry men and women can marry women, which undermines the who principle of marriage. We want to see our criminal MPs put on trial but because they control the legal system this will not happen unless we have a revolution. Large corporation break our laws and are given such small fines relative to the profits of their crimes, that it is no deterrent to further crimes.Laws have been enacted to make small family businesses which are the lifeblood of any economy uneconomical. And all becuse the large corporation have the money to buy power through corrupt MPs. In China democracy is alive and well. The Chinese government recognised that it rules by consent, In England and the US governments rules because of money.

1

I often hear my Chinese friends harping on about so-called "Human Rights" as if it is something China doesn't have and we should be grateful that we have human rights In the UK.The fact is the Human rights act was written and presented to the world as a charter to prevent the rise of another "Nazi Party" by Winston Churchill. It was never intended to affect the lives of ordinary citizens, but it does. The human rights act is one of the most misused pieces of legislation ever written. Many in the west see it being used to protect criminals from facing justice. In this regard the Human rights act means the agencies of law and order are compelled to protect the rights of the criminal above the rights of the victims of the criminal. Is that something China wants to see happen here? I think not.It is a fact the a criminal from another country can come to England and continue his or her life of crime with impunity because of the Human Rights Act. In fact once they commit a crime in the UK, even if they are there illegally They will be given the right to stay and claim all the rights of a legal citizen just because they have committed a criminal act. One particular incident which featered in a documentry called, "Human rights, Human Wrongs" a forign criminal trying to escape due legal process in his own country killed a young girl and was given the shamefully short prison sentence of a mere three months. Being wanted for crimes in his own country gave him the right to legal residency in the UK on his release from prison. That's just crazy. But that case is not a rare example of how the Human Rights Act protects criminals, is it common place.If a foreigner came to China and killed a young girl during a drug fuelled murder they would get a bullet in the head. Well done China, why change something that works well. I can walk the streets of Chinese cities exploring late at night without the worry of violent crimes or robbery, I can't do that in a small town in England as it has become more and more violent like its American master. China is a peaceful safe country because it is not party to the Human Right Act. When someone kills without just cause they get the death penalty in China, When someone rapes a child in China the law will jump on them from a very great height because in China the rights of the victim are placed before the rights of the criminal. That is a good human rights outcome compared to so many European countries.In China I have seen people enjoying more freedom than we have seen in the UK since the early 1980's. In China we have a police force that polices the streets with a soft hand. On the rare occasions we see police on the streets of the UK outside of tourist areas they look like a paramilitary force and are hostile. We once respected the police in the UK, now we see then as the protectors of criminals and the corrupt. Instead of looking at other countries and the positive propaganda they produce to get the Chinese people to think they are better places than China, look at china and how free we are here. People don't need to keep guns in their shops, homes or cars in China, but they do in the US. Violent crime is dealt with properly and the victims are supported in China. In the UK violent criminals are protected by the legal system, resulting in them getting away with their crimes and the needs of their victims being ignored.As they said when i was a boy, "If it ain't broken, don't fix it" China works well for her people so when some pseudo interlectual tells you about human rights, remind them how much China has advanced and how swift China is to protect the victims of crime. When some foreigner is telling you how great their country is, ask them why they are living in China, especially the Americans who come from one of the most violent and corrupt nations in the world.

11

The USA which now calls itself the US because it had taken over countries on other continents is certainly the most dangerous nation of earth. It revels in its nuclear arsenal and is the only country that has used nuclear weapons to strike an enemy. The US claims they are for peace keeping purposes despite the fact that they have used them for attack. The us feels that other nation should not have nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Yet the US stockpiles them like food for the winter.The US is a nation founded by business men who don't like paying tax, for business men who don't like paying tax, which is why they cultivated ways, through accounting, for the rich to avoid paying tax. The US is selling itself as the champion of democracy so long as it is American style democracy. They condemn the Crimea's democratic decision to algin itself with Russia but will use military force to stop end the government people in other countries accept. Clearly that is not democratic.They will see their own people die in the name of profit through its health care system and recognise that the US is so dangerous people must have guns to defend themselves.The US points its gnarled finger at China on human rights issues but breaches the Human rights it is claiming to protect when it torture and imprisons people without trial.The US preaches free trade but practises protectionism. It talks of cooperation so long as those it speaks to will do what it wants and not what is good for their nation and their people.Through popular and consumer culture is shapes the culture of other nations so that they become more and more aligned with american culture. But is American culture better than other cultures it replaces? Clearly if you think that a country where school children carry guns and shoot their classmates, drugs are found everywhere, gambling is promoted as a good way to get rich, infidelity is a positive step forward, "White Collar" criminals who harm hundreds of thousands, a government that cares only about the balance sheet, invading other countries for profit and promoting these values through popular culture aimed at the young are good things America is better.I would rather stand alone and say it is not better, it is dangerous. than bend to the false smiles of the American Empire which does not have the courage to stand up honestly and declare its intentions to dominate the world.America is indeed the most dangerous nation on earth and here in China I see it doing what it did to the UK and other nations. It seduces our children knowing they are the parents of tomorrow and will unknowingly bend and accept the American ways of corruption and greed. All around our beloved China America is at work to try and make China look bad because evil fears that which is good.

9

the UK's "Culture Secretary" Maria Miller has been caught committing fraud against her employer. When a worker in the UK commits and act of fraud through their expenses they are immediately sacked and face a criminal prosecution. Those who help them or support them in the criminal activities by deeds or not taking action are called accomplices and also face criminal prosecution. The UK's "Daily Telegraph" claims documents show Maria Miller stopped claiming expenses on her "second" home in south London after being asked to sign a declaration confirming that she would pay capital gains tax when it was sold. Mrs Miller bought her Wimbledon property in 1996, before she became an MP, and sold it in February this year for a reported profit of over £1m. This is her second exposed financial crime, on this occassion the crime of tax evasion. yet she still works for her employer and has not been arrested by the police. Between 2005 and 2009, she told the House of Commons it was her second home, allowing her to claim public money to pay the mortgage on it. This is also a crime as it was her primary home and should be funded out of her own pocket and not at the taxpayer expense. The conservative pary chairman supports Mrs Miller's criminal activities. Such is the the common level of criminal corruption in the UK. Even the Prime Minister David Cameron is guilty of these same crimes as are most MP's. I am so glad that here in China criminal politicians and civil servant face prosecution and lose their jobs. In the UK Politicians are above the law which makes them a dictatorship of criminals. Let's hope China's leader and his wife continue to set a good example for the rest of us and the world to follow, rather than the bad examples of the US and UK.When a public offical uses their priviledges to make personal profits they are guilty of a number of criminal acts in the UK and here in China. We are so lucky that we have a leader who is determined to make sure China's leaders act in a morally responsible way.

2