Are search engines practicing self censorship?
2017-02-23
Recently, there has been an infamous hk judge who's been in the news. He handed out harsh sentences to hk cops who beat a rioter (probably on the payroll of ngo). There's been a lot of talk that the infamous judge, david dufton, when handing out the sentence, was more interested in promoting western interests (in other words inperialism) in the city, than justice. If you are curious about the judge, and wanted to look him up, however, nothing can be found about him. Essentially, the big search engines like bing, or gugle have removed his existance from the web. Are they protecting their guy? If david dufton hasn't done anything wrong, why is he in hiding? And why is bing/m$ facilitating his evasion? Hey, I thought gugle was against censorship, so why be hypocritical? Let's see the guy's family pictures, and life story. The west frequently talks of transparency, so let's start this transparency proces by publicizing who hong kong's judges are, and what their background is. If they can't be up front to the public who they serve, then should they be judges in the first place?
no comment
Comment