Can China give the US freedom of choice?
2014-08-11
A choice between aggressive war mongers or even more aggressive war mongers.
That is the "choice" the U.S. citizens have the "freedom" to choose from in the coming presidential election.
Hillary Clinton is the one that is slightly less aggressive than the Republicans who are always foaming at
the mouth for a new armed conflict somewhere in the world.
But even this "less aggressive" choice wants to go back to killing more people in the mideast thinking it
will somehow lead to a more secure world, especially for the U.S.
I don't know about you but in the 59 years I have been on earth I found that assaulting your neighbors
on a regular basis does not make for a peaceful life. Telling your neighbors you are assaulting them because
you think you know better what is good for them than they do never helps matters either.
That is the "choice" the U.S. citizens have the "freedom" to choose from in the coming presidential election.
Hillary Clinton is the one that is slightly less aggressive than the Republicans who are always foaming at
the mouth for a new armed conflict somewhere in the world.
But even this "less aggressive" choice wants to go back to killing more people in the mideast thinking it
will somehow lead to a more secure world, especially for the U.S.
I don't know about you but in the 59 years I have been on earth I found that assaulting your neighbors
on a regular basis does not make for a peaceful life. Telling your neighbors you are assaulting them because
you think you know better what is good for them than they do never helps matters either.
This slightly less aggressive choice also wants more support for the playland of rich Jews that Hitler set up prior to
WWII in what the Jews eventually named Israel. And this is supposed to help bring peace to the mideast how?
WWII in what the Jews eventually named Israel. And this is supposed to help bring peace to the mideast how?
The glamour of marketing terms such as "freedome of choice" and "Democracy" are losing their luster.
We in the U.S. have no choice but to support our obscenely rich capitalist masters and fight their wars for them.
There is never another choice given to us and we are kept ignorant of better social and economic systems which
are not taught in our schools. We are only taught about how great America is and that capitalism is the only
economic system that works... as long as the most powerful nation in the world keeps beating other systems down.
Maybe China will be able to give us another choice in the U.S. someday. One can only hope.
We in the U.S. have no choice but to support our obscenely rich capitalist masters and fight their wars for them.
There is never another choice given to us and we are kept ignorant of better social and economic systems which
are not taught in our schools. We are only taught about how great America is and that capitalism is the only
economic system that works... as long as the most powerful nation in the world keeps beating other systems down.
Maybe China will be able to give us another choice in the U.S. someday. One can only hope.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WASHINGTON - Distancing herself from President Barack Obama's foreign policy, potential 2016 U.S. presidential
candidate Hillary Clinton said that the U.S. decision not to intervene early in the Syrian civil war was a "failure."
WASHINGTON - Distancing herself from President Barack Obama's foreign policy, potential 2016 U.S. presidential
candidate Hillary Clinton said that the U.S. decision not to intervene early in the Syrian civil war was a "failure."
Republican critics have faulted Obama for doing too little to support Syrians who rose up against President
Bashar al-Assad. Syria has been torn apart by a civil war for three years, with Assad staying in power and Islamic
militants among the opposition gaining strength.
Bashar al-Assad. Syria has been torn apart by a civil war for three years, with Assad staying in power and Islamic
militants among the opposition gaining strength.
"The failure to help build up a credible fighting force of the people who were the originators of the protests against
Assad - there were Islamists, there were secularists, there was everything in the middle - the failure to do that left a
big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled," Clinton said in a recent interview.
Assad - there were Islamists, there were secularists, there was everything in the middle - the failure to do that left a
big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled," Clinton said in a recent interview.
Clinton was Obama's secretary of state during his first term as president, stepping down in early 2013, so she was
part of the administration during the start of the Syria uprising. Seen as a possible strong contender for the 2016
U.S. Democratic presidential nomination, she ran unsuccessfully against Obama for the party's nomination in 2008.
part of the administration during the start of the Syria uprising. Seen as a possible strong contender for the 2016
U.S. Democratic presidential nomination, she ran unsuccessfully against Obama for the party's nomination in 2008.
Asked about Obama's slogan of "Don’t do stupid stuff" to describe his foreign policy thinking, Clinton said,
"Great nations need organizing principles, and 'Don’t do stupid stuff’ is not an organizing principle."
"Great nations need organizing principles, and 'Don’t do stupid stuff’ is not an organizing principle."
In the interview, Clinton also offered strong support for Israel and for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has a
tense relationship with Obama.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tense relationship with Obama.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You're so confused now there is no point in carrying on this.. whatever it is you're attempting to do.
"I merely pointed out that they were instrumental in creating Israel."
{Facepalm} ... Robert... Wow...
... and the Brits are to be creditted for attempting to keep the peace in Palenstine?
What makes you think I'm showing the Nazis in a good light?
I merely pointed out that they were instrumental in creating Israel.
That alone should be enough to condemn then for eternity.
Hm... Haavara Agreement: http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0008_0_08075.html
... which was the response from Berlin to 'get around' the boycott of German Goods by Jewish organizations? https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/The_Anti-Nazi_Boycott.html
Sorry Robert, but given the Nazi's Party's rather open stance on Communists, and their backing of the Chinese Nationalists, I am a bit surprised a fellow like yourself would be showing such a positive light.
You should consider the Haavara Agreement. The Haavara (Transfer) Agreement was agreed to by the German government in 1933 to allow the Zionist movement, in the form of the Haavara company to transfer property from Germany to Palestine, for the sole purpose of encouraging Jewish emigration from Germany. The Haavara company operated under a similar plan as the earlier Hanotea company. The Haavara Company required immigrants to pay at least 1000 pounds sterling into the banking company. This money would then be used to buy German exports for import to Palestine.
It's a pretty sweet deal for rich Jews. 1000 pounds sterling was pocket change to them and they got to invade massive amounts of real estate in the middle east to boot.
"This slightly less aggressive choice also wants more support for the playland of rich Jews that Hitler set up prior to
WWII in what the Jews eventually named Israel." Hm... wasn't that supposed to be a series of ovens in Eastern Europe, along with the Gays, Slavs, Gypsys, and other 'Non-Aryans"?
Thank you. I think your feeling about Hillary is correct.
The Republicans have had 8 years to make up stories about how
killing more people would have made us safer. A democrat knows
he or she will have to appear hawkish to stand a better chance.
Very good insight. 2016 will be interesting to see if Hillary runs/gets the nomination. I have a feeling she'll be more Hawkish than her husband or Obama.
Comment