Home / Forum / Blog
New blog SIGN IN

sanam

2

Blogs

Blog

unlikely shil

2017-07-07

Shilling aint easy. in an ideal world, inperialists would like to only use white bourgeois shils, because they are the most reliable and trust worthy, at least according to the western oligarky. using white bourgeois shils is fine to brain wash other bourgeoisie, but what do you do about the masses? the inperialist is always one step ahead. Who is the most likely to disent? people from the wrong side of the tracks, and those in 3 world countries who suffer as a result of western exploitation. so what do you do to keep these people in line? certainly you cant use white bourgeois shils who went to private school, and were members of frats, because those from the wrong side of the tracks, and in 3 world countries dont always resonate with white bourgeoisie because the insincere, and phony attitudes of the white bourgeosie can be a turn off. guys from the ghetto will automatically be suspicious of a white frat boy. so what do you do if youre an inperialist? obviously, you got to get a homeboy from off the street, someone who is less sophisticated, or at least someone who looks, and perhaps acts like a homeboy from off the street. this way, the guys from the wrong side of the tracks, and the 3 world will listen to the shil's story and not view it with much suspicion, maybe even believe the lies. even if the shil wasnt a homeboy, he'd have to at least look like someone from the 3 world if he were to influence a 3 world audience of potential dupes.When we usually think of shilz, we think of white guys, or juwesh , but we probably wouldnt have a black guy in mind. inteligence agencies also have a preference for using white guys, or juwesh , while avoiding aboriginals, asians , blacks, and hispanics. But did you know, there are black shils. in fact, theres been black shils. the art of shiling is to deceive, and what better way to deceive you than to use someone who you wouldnt think was a shil. one would normally assume that blacks wouldnt shil for the white man because of how whites have historically treated blacks, even though there have always been compradores throughout africa who served their colonial masters. blacks have also sided with the chinese from 50-78 when conflicts erupted between china, and the inperialists. but things have changed, and times have changed. It should also be known that oligarks in the west have been scared to death of blacks ever since they were freed from slavery. therefore it is, and was imperative for the whites to obstruct any possibility of a union between asians, and blacks, and most specifically, black, and chinese, because a union between blacks, and chinese would certainly rattle the white diktatorship of the world today. this is why it is essential for the white oligarks to mislead blacks, whether theyre in africa, or america.This is where the compradore comes in. they usually have a long track record of serving colonialism, and have become wealthy off it. one such case is a man who calls himself "ghana baby". he's from ghana. he's a compradore, and bourgeoisie. he's in china to give it a bad name. however, to make sure he deceives his audience, he tells his audience that he "loves china" after making videos portraying china as racist, and ignorant, while objectifying chinese women of course.youtube channel =MrGhanaBabyhis videos are more subtly anti chinese than a white shil like laowhy, but nonetheless they serve the same purpose and probably the same pay master. what makes his prapaganda effective is, we normally dont associate ghana with disinformation, eventhough it makes sense due to its historic ties to britain, but it's not something that automatically comes up when we think of ghana. we're normally thinking of a poor country, not one that is trying to pull one over on us, but as i mentioned before, compradores of the lowest integrity exist in every country, even poor ones. therefore an ordinary netizen will keep his guard down when viewing this guys videos, and not view it with much suspicion. at the same time, blacks who are sympathetic towards china will think twice after viewing this man's videos. he is an important tool for driving a wedge between africans, and china.Another black shil that comes to mind is a man who calls himself the loser laowai who now goes by the name of winner laowai. he is a new york american black, and married to a chinese citizen, which goes to show the lengths that shils are willing to go to destabilize china. the majority of his video have an anti chinese theme, or features him complaining about china.Going back even further, we had a black shil a few years back who has since gone back to america. he goes by the name of ra sims ii. this man may have the most street cred amongst the above shills, adding to his usefulness in coming off as an "ordinary person", deceiving the public. again, his agenda is to make china look bad, unsophisticated, and criticize china. he seemed to do things from a ghetto point of view to throw off his audience, and hide the fact that he is a shil and serves his white masters loyaly. his ghetto approach made ordinary people identify with his videos, and believe his distortion

0

deceptive terminology

2017-07-04

We shall address the issue of the western media bias today, because the western media has a totalitarien diktatorship over worldwide media. yes, the chinese media is also biased, but they are irrelevant in the rest of the world. so today we will focus on the western media use of double standards. Have you ever noticed that the politicians in hong kong who are sympathetic towards the central goverment are known as pro-beijing? I am not arguing that these politicians arent pro beijing. they probably are, but politicians recieving funding from the west are never refered to as pro western, even though they are coached on what to say by western ngo's. they are most likely reading from scripts prepared by the ClA; and have intimate relations with western inteligence agencies. yet these compradores are simply refered to as "pan demacrats", despite having a long trail that leads back to the west. is the west trying to hide the fact that these so called "demacrats" are propped up by the west?not only that, they are labeled as "pan demacrat" by the corporate media without being able to prove that they have any traits of being demacratic. in order to classify as demacratic, you must oppose inperialism, and multinational corperations, while representing the working class, but these "pan demacrats" have it backwards. as far as we can see, "pan demacrats" have no opposition towards inperialism, no opposition to foreign multinational corporations, and the bourgoisie in general. so what is it that makes them demacratic? from what the public can see, the "pan demacrats" sympathies lie with corporations, and inperialism, something that is very anti demacratic, showing the deceptive nature of western corporate media, and their stooges. the so called "pan demacrats" look like spokesmen for foreign multinational corporations, and inperialists. most of these "pan demacrats" are more likely to be seen having dinner with bourgeoisie, and inperialists, than the proletariat, or working class. they're more concerned about buying iphones than they are the liberation, or well being of the masses. whats even worse is that most of the "pan demacrats" are waving british flags. since when does anyone remotely demacratic wave around british flags? particularly considering that britain was, and is one of the worst inperialists. in fact, britain is at the forefront of sabatoging demacracy around the world and is known to asasinate those who advocate independence from neo inperialism. so what is it that makes them "demacrats"? probably nothing. this is why the word demacracy has very deceptive meanings in the media. in fact, being demakratic has come to mean you are being favored by inperialism, and if you are favored by inperialism, you're very unlikely to be demacratic. i may be wrong, but as far as i know, inperialists have never supported demacracy and have always violently opposed it.if we look at the ukraine, we see a similar situation. the rebels are now refered to as being pro russian, but if you noticed before the maidan, the rebels were never refered to being pro western, or pro amerikan, despite the funding they received from the west. yet as soon as the pro western forces seized control, the ones who opposed them were now automatically labeled as pro russian. now, i am not debating whether russia is backing these rebels or not, but i am quite certain that the original rebels from the right sector and so on were pro western. even if they werent pro western, it's likely they received funding, and training from the west. in fact, the situation is the same in hk, and the ukraine, and many of these, if not most of the pro western politicians, have citizenship in the west, therefore it is entirely likely that their loyalties lie in the west, and not with the ukraine, or hk.

0