- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 24638 Hour
- Reading permission
Hey gtnbia, here are the details on Longshanks, George W. Bush and Powell
Hey friends, you don't suppose I'd make something up like this do you? LOL.|
If you can access my original article on the subject on June 17, 2003 go ahead and click this clink:
Otherwise here are the incomplete details of Dubya's lineage from
Longshanks ([Edward 1 (1239-1307)] to
Longshanks's daughter Princess Elizabeth Plantagenet (1282-1363) to
Alinore de Bohun (1304-1363) to......through several generations to
Anne Marbury (1591-1643) to....through several g. to
Hannah Ruck (1701-1767c) to ....through several g. to
Samuel Prescott Bush (1863-1948) to
Prescott Sheldon Bush (1895-1972) to
Pres. George Herbert Walker Bush (b. 1924)
Pres. George Walker Bush (b. 1946)
According to the same source (TIME online), Colin Powell was also descended from Longshanks. In fact, he was descended from Longshanks' son Edward II. Eventually someone impregnated a Jamaican slave girl who became one of Powell's ancestors.
Here's the article but the lineage cannot be uploaded because it was in the form of a chart and this forum does not allow us to upload a picture in the form of a chart.
wchao37 (820 posts)
Jun-16-03, 02:32 PM (EST)
<b>The significance of Bush and Powell's common ancestry in Longshanks in the Age of Neo-colonialist Resurgence</b>
Remember the King "Longshanks" in "Braveheart" who by sheer cunning and ruthless disregard of the lives of his soldiers, won a decisive battle against "Braveheart," a Scottish rebel played by Mel Gibson?
That Longshanks, according to news today, is the common ancestor of George W. Bush and Colin Powell.
That seems to solve several puzzles in recent memory:
1. It explains why Powell never lost confidence with His Majesty despite his projected nice-guy image in the cabinet (before Iraq). He was sculpted to play that role from the very beginning and was never in danger of losing the job despite his differences with the Rumsfelds and Boltons and Wolfowitzes.
2. It also explains the fundamental schizm between the Anglo nations on one side and the French/German West European union on the other. The ancient enmity is as deep-rooted as that between any two East Asian nations. The hate-love-hate psychological complex is never far beneath the surface. Scratch a Frenchman and you'll find an Anglophobe anytime of the day.
3. It shows the British Commonwealth should include the United States of America, and that Jews and Christians are acting in unison to re-invigorate neo-colonialism -- a process interrupted by Hitler's war sixty-four years ago since Hitler's victories showed that the powerful colonial nations such as Britain, France and Holland were merely pushovers if the people of the colonial subject nations dare to unite and fight like the Germans did. This was the unintended result of Hitler's conquests in Europe. The colonial governments were in a hurry to let the colonial peoples liberate themselves in Asia, Africa and Latin America chiefly because they had lost confidence in themselves after the war.
4. With the demise of the Soviet Union, which was the greatest stumbling block to the recovery of European colonialism in post-war years, in their minds the road is now clear for a resurgence of Anglo-dominated colonialism, and the Iraqi War is the first war of this resurgence.
I may just go ahead and post this one so that more people are aware of this fact of their genealogy.