Views: 5983|Replies: 7

Westward Ho! China marching West? [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 4

Post time 2013-2-9 19:12:29 |Display all floors
This post was edited by Prometheus2 at 2013-2-9 19:13

Westward Ho!

As America pivots east, China marches in the other direction.
BY YUN SUN |FEBRUARY 7, 2013



In November, Barack Obama became the first sitting U.S. president to visit Burma, and the first to visit Cambodia. As part of his administration's pivot to Asia, Obama has ratcheted up his diplomacy with the region. Besides Southeast Asia, which is moving closer to the United States at the cost of its relationship with China, Obama has also re-emphasized his security relationship with China's rival Japan. But as the United States pivots out of the Middle East and Afghanistan and into East Asia, Beijing is debating a pivot of its own: a grand strategic proposal to shift its attention from East Asia and rebalance its geographical priority westward to Central Asia, South Asia, and the Middle East.

The strategy, called "Marching West," was recently articulated by Wang Jisi, dean of the School of International Studies at Peking University and one of China's most important strategic thinkers, in an October article in the Global Timesnewspaper. The proposal has passed the stage of academic research, and the front-runners of Beijing's foreign-policy apparatus have been mobilized to study feasibility, implementation, and potential reactions.The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, China's most prominent think tank, will be holding an internal conference to study Marching West, according to a Beijing-based scholar.Meanwhile, the U.S. Embassy in Beijing is quietly investigating Marching West, according to several people who spoke with U.S. officials about the strategy.

It's a bold idea. As Washington rebalances to Asia, Wang sees the relationship between the United States and China growing increasingly contentious and zero-sum. He argues that because both powers are seeking to expand their influence in East Asia, a head-on military confrontation with the United States might become inevitable.Beijing thinks Washington is trying to block China's rise in the East through strengthened military alliances, sabotaging China's ties with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and undercutting China's effort to lead the region's economic integration by pushing the U.S.-centered (and China-free) Trans-Pacific Partnership. In response, Wang advocates enhancing China's presence, resources, diplomatic efforts, and engagement in Central Asia, South Asia, and the Middle East.      
   
America's Pacific Century
  

While Wang see threats in the waters to the east, the region to China's west bears no such risks. The area lacks a U.S.-dominated regional order or a pre-existing economic integration mechanism. Unlike Western Europe or East Asia, it has not and will not form an American-led military alliance, says Wang. The only true U.S. allies in that region are Israel and Saudi Arabia; compare that with East Asia, home to several powerful countries that have deep trade and security ties with the United States, from Australia to Japan.

The logic of Marching West reflects China's complex regional quagmire -- but also untapped opportunity. Unlike in East Asia, where China and the United States are often at loggerheads, to the west they share common interests. Both want stability in Afghanistan and Iraq, an end to hostilities in Syria, a curbing of terrorism and regional nonproliferation, and a constant flow of oil. Marching West would offer Beijing additional strategic leverage against Washington, which "is desperate for China's assistance in stabilizing Afghanistan and Pakistan," Wang writes.

Just as the U.S. pivot to Asia does not mean Washington intends to abandon the Middle East or the rest of the world, China's proposed western shift doesn't mean it's giving up East Asia. Chinese leaders are well aware of the rapid deterioration of China's external environment in that region. But Wang's policy does call for yielding in certain areas. Indeed, China now appears to be more willing to cooperate with the United States on North Korea; it supported a U.N. resolution in January tightening sanctions against the country and has used harsher-than-normal tones against Pyongyang.
I may disagree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it - Voltaire

The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them
ignora

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2013-2-9 19:14:06 |Display all floors
There are already signs that China is beginning its pivot. In September, Zhou Yongkang, then a member of China's top decision-making body, the Politburo Standing Committee, went to Kabul -- the highest-ranking official to visit in almost 50 years. While there, he made the unprecedented pledge to assist in "training, funding, and equipping Afghan police." In previous years, China's western adventures were focused on fighting Uighurs (a restive minority who live mostly in the region of Xinjiang, which borders Afghanistan) and natural resource investment, like the $3 billion Mes Aynak copper mine, set to be operational in 2014 -- not on Afghanistan's internal security. But this January, China held its first consultation with Pakistan about the situation in Afghanistan, and in 2012 China organized two "trilateral consultations" among the three countries. The move signals a significant policy shift, from a hands-off approach to active engagement to stabilize its turbulent neighbor.

In fact, China has been looking west since at least 2000, when it launched the "Grand Western Development" program, a national strategy designed to right the imbalance between the western and eastern halves of the country. China's west accounts for 71 percent of the country's territory, but only 27 percent of its population and 18.7 percent of its GDP, according to 2010 figures. There's clearly opportunity to be found there. In his essay, Wang says that from 2001 to 2011, China's trade with South Asia and Western Asia grew more than 30 times, while its trade with the rest of the world over the same period grew seven times. The wealthier and more stable that Afghanistan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, and the other countries to China's west are, Wang notes, the easier it is to promote economic development in the west. In pursuit of this end, Beijing must speed up the construction of its trade and communication links with Central Asia and beyond -- what it calls a "New Silk Road"-- to ensure the smooth flow of energy supplies and commodities into western China and to enhance economic cooperation with the region. Going back even further, China saw itself as a significant Central Asian power, with territory stretching to Lake Balkhash in Kazakhstan, as recently as the 1860s, when Beijing lost 170,000 square miles of territory to Russia. And Wang isn't the first prominent Chinese strategic thinker to argue for a strategic shift west: People's Liberation Army Gen. Liu Yazhou proposed that China "seize for the center of the world [the Middle East]" as early as 2004.

The policy is not yet strategic doctrine -- it's unknown what incoming president Xi Jinping and the current Politburo Standing Committee think about it. Xi's predecessor, Hu Jintao, strengthened the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a regional body composed of China, Russia, and most Central Asian countries, but has not elaborated on his view for China in the region. Wang, at the end of his essay, stressed -- modestly -- that he isn't advocating that his strategy become "clear-cut foreign policy." Yet it seems influential enough that Wang's proposal has met with opposition from strategists such as Rear Adm. Yang Yi, who has argued that China's expansion into the Pacific and Indian oceans is a prerequisite for the country to call itself a global great power.

Washington would be wise, however, to start thinking hard about Marching West. The strategy could provide China with an alternate realm of influence, one free from U.S. dominance. By returning to its roots as a continental power, China might avoid further confrontation with the United States in East Asia, foster stability, and build a better relationship with Washington through cooperation in places such as Afghanistan and Pakistan. It is perhaps the ultimate manifestation of Chairman Mao Zedong's famous military strategy: "Where the enemy advances, we retreat. Where the enemy retreats, we pursue."
I may disagree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it - Voltaire

The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them
ignora

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 2

Post time 2013-2-10 12:31:37 |Display all floors
China should also pivot to South American nations behind America's door steps.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-2-10 18:27:36 |Display all floors
this is all about money & lots of it...amerika used to be very generous about this but lately it's hard for the US to dig deep into its pockets; expansion of china own westward bound is a must & not so sure of foreign territories...and again moneys do the talkin first  {:soso_e114:}{:soso_e113:}
a man who uses his hands is a laborer. one who uses his hands and his mind is a craftsman. but he who uses his hands, his mind, and his heart, is an artist...

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 3Rank: 3

Post time 2013-2-10 18:41:06 |Display all floors
This post was edited by lostfornames at 2013-2-10 18:41

Sensationalist headline and poorly concluded article, China will always be there in the East, expanding Westward means focusing on expanding economic development Westward and developing new economic opportunities and potentially cheaper and untapped trade sources as it opens up, the future lies in both developing East and West, the concern with North Korea have to do with nuclear proliferation which will affect everyone not just the United States, it's not a zero sum game, a military doctrine or a checkered board game. Any destabilization in Asia will effect everyone, not just the countries in the region. American pivot is doomed to fail if it brings destabilization to the region, just as China's attention to the West is doomed to failure if it does not provide economical benefits to the region and itself.  

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2013-2-10 18:59:18 |Display all floors
lostfornames Post time: 2013-2-10 18:41
Sensationalist headline and poorly concluded article, China will always be there in the East, expand ...

You just reiterated a lot of what the article said.
I may disagree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it - Voltaire

The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them
ignora

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2013-2-10 20:24:53 |Display all floors
A delicate strategy. China might of course tie up with nations such as Afgahnistan and Iran - but they won't be helping it much as they are rather weak, compared to the USA's allies. The rest of central asia is controlled by Russia - so if China wants to build ties with them, it will have to submit to Russia and that's certainly not in its best interest. India isn't much of an option either, so it's a difficult task indeed.

It's an interesting game, indeed. If I were in China's shoes, I'd still try to build closer ties with Russia and make Russia depend on China more. It will be difficult and success might be unlikely - but if China succeeds and Russia becomes its close ally, China's reach will all of the sudden expand all over Eurasia, even reaching deep into Europe!

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.