Author: abramicus

ONLY CHINA HAS EFFECTIVE JURISDICTION OVER DIAOYUDAO FROM HEREON.   [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-12-27 16:54:17 |Display all floors

RE: ONLY CHINA HAS EFFECTIVE JURISDICTION OVER DIAOYUDAO FROM HEREON.

The simple logic is that when one builds a house on a piece of land that belongs to oneself, the land that is outside the house is also part and parcel of one's property!

Excerpt"


History of Diaoyu Islands  
Updated: 2012-07-10 11:24  
( History of Diaoyu Islands)

BEIJING - The Diaoyu Islands, which lie in the East China Sea between China and Japan have belonged to China since ancient times.

The islands are 120 nautical miles northeast of Taiwan province, 200 nautical miles west of the Chinese mainland and200 nautical miles east of Japan's southernmost island, Okinawa.

FIRST NATIONS ( LAKOTA PEOPLE ) Heartbreaking - (Google Search for video) "to stay true to who you are. Never allow anyone make you different or think different about what it is you are created to be ...

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member 2015 Most Popular Member 2014 Most Popular Member

Post time 2012-12-27 17:09:28 |Display all floors
International law says the Senkakus islands are Japanese.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2012-12-28 00:17:23 |Display all floors
sansukong Post time: 2012-12-27 16:54
The simple logic is that when one builds a house on a piece of land that belongs to oneself, the lan ...
BEIJING - The Diaoyu Islands, which lie in the East China Sea between China and Japan have belonged to China since ancient times.

The islands are 120 nautical miles northeast of Taiwan province, 200 nautical miles west of the Chinese mainland


You're not making a very good case if you're obviously lying. The Chinese seem to have a problem with numbers, when it's about Chinese victims they double or tripple them and when it's about distance to islands they'd like to grab they divide it by 2 or 3.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-12-28 01:46:05 |Display all floors

RE: ONLY CHINA HAS EFFECTIVE JURISDICTION OVER DIAOYUDAO FROM HEREON.

FIRST NATIONS ( LAKOTA PEOPLE ) Heartbreaking - (Google Search for video) "to stay true to who you are. Never allow anyone make you different or think different about what it is you are created to be ...

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-12-28 16:44:00 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2012-12-28 16:51

RECENT JAPANESE CLAIMS THAT THE PRC MOFA ADMITTED DIAOYUDAO WAS PART OF RYUKYU AND CALLED IT "SENKAKU" IS A PIECE OF SHITTY DISINFORMATION, AS IT DID NOT MENTION THE DOCUMENT WAS A DRAFT OF A POSSIBLE POSITION THAT THE PRC COULD, BUT DID NOT TAKE, ON DIAOYUDAO.  DRAFTS OF EVERY POSSIBLE SCENARIO ARE PART AND PARCEL OF INTERNAL ANALYSES, AND ARE NOT THE FINAL POLICIES OF THE PRC GOVERNMENT IN 1950.

It is a good wake-up call to the existence of Japanese moles within the PRC MOFA in 1950 who pretending to be comrades to the same ideology were actually traitors of a different nationality or national loyalty.  These idiots even placed in the People's Daily at the same time, an unsigned article, describing Diaoyudao as part of Japan without any authorization from any official agency with jurisdiction over defining national territory.  These moles continue to exist within the MOFA today, who are most likely the ones to offer to Japan drafts of scenario-analyses that were NEVER ADOPTED AS THE OFFICIAL POSITION of the Chinese government.  All official policies will have the name and title of the official signing it.  It if was not signed by anyone at the level of Minister of the MOFA, it is just a piece of garbage picked up from the trash can of the MOFA of 1950, and carry no weight in saying that "China" admitted Diaoyudao belonged to Japan.  Key therefore to this piece of shitty disinformation is, "Can the author of the draft be identified, and was the draft ever adopted officially?"  If not, it is actually another proof that this suggestion was rejected by the officials in real charge of the MOFA.  One pro-Japanese mole working as a consultant to the MOFA think tank is not the same as the Minister of the MOFA saying that such a hare-brained idea is China's official policy.  It never was.

These recent propaganda pieces only help identify the pro-Japanese mouthpieces within the Chinese media of today who are among the first to "reveal" this "discovery" of the Japanese that fundamentally is of no consequence since it was clearly a "DRAFT" according the document itself.  If Diaoyudao is considered a part of Ryukyu, then Ryukyu must be considered a part of China, for it to be true.  Else it is false.


Use magic tools Report

Post time 2012-12-28 16:47:47 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member 2015 Most Popular Member 2014 Most Popular Member

Post time 2012-12-28 17:04:03 |Display all floors
What does international law say about who of the islands?  

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.