Who's next on the dinner table of Anglo?

chinoamigo

Good question, I'm afraid but I don't know the precise answer, if I'm be honest with you.

My guess though is that Russia began their occupation in late 1979, after the exploration & discovery in that country.


Speaking of which, once again, those geogoligists from Russia (and Australia as well, if I am correct) are pretty busy exploring South East Asia; one of the spots notebly is in northern Burma, rebel held areas as I heard.



Long-Live Indochina

https://bbs.chinadaily.com.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=742201&fromuid=768408


ASIANS, PIRATES AND BEARS

https://bbs.chinadaily.com.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=711807&fromuid=768408

GustyWind

seneca Post time: 2018-6-15 10:06
**** Author was prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked ****

Speaking of SLAVERY, please bear in mind the hidden truth that in the Southern United States where Slavery flourished

and bloomed for a good couple centuries were literally financed, by the way of wealthy Anglo folks in jolly ole England.

How?

Here's how.

The notorious Southern states were poor but has plenty of lands, while England was rich but has little land.

So from buying the slaves from Africa, to shipping them over to U.S.A, to employing them in cotton fields,

all across the South, then shipping the cotton to English clothing mills - through the whole process were get involved,

done, and financed by wealthy England.

No wonder they even sided with the South in Civil War in the 19th century.

Moreover, all the military hardware used by the South in Civil War were financed and supplied by Britain;

from rifles to Cannons to ships to even small submarines were all shipped from there.

In conclusion, this being just one fine example of how dog-eat-dog, winner-takes-all Capitalist rules put

wealth above all else, past and present, same old same old!