- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 60 Hour
- Reading permission
"911 -- Did it happen the way the Anglos said it did?"|
The short answer is No.
But before you examine the events of 911, its helpfull to learn about:
I- Operation NORTHWOODS: Plans by the Pentagon to commit acts of terrorism and miliary attacks on US civilians and military blaming Cuba and causing either(or both) real vicitms and/or fictitious victims. The Plan was rejected by JFK. It included
a) Attacks by US special forces disguised as Cubans against US base at Guantanamo, that would destroy infrastructure, sink a ship, and cause casualties(ficticious but made real by altering records, id, death certificate, mock funerals)
b) Shooting down a passenger aiplane using a US controled fighter plane painted to look like a Cuban aircraft(could be an actual Mig or not)
c) having CIA agents book a flight, flight lands in military base, similar plane painted with same id takes off and is remotely controled, when nearing Cuba it sends a distress call poining to a Cuban fighter, then the plane is destroyed in mid air with remotely detonated explosives. The US would wait for an ally that would ear the distress call to 'tell them' the plane was attacked
d) military fighterjet exercise near cuba in which an undercover pilot joining the exercise under false identity would fly close to Cuba, make a distress call saying Cuban airforce was attacking him, flydown below radar, head back to an other (USbase) not part of the exercise, a sub/boat would release debris. In this scenario it important to know that virtually all the military personel in the drill do not know theres a subterfuge and really think Cuba did it.
Note that a campaign of terrorism in the US could not be made by a group calling itself "US CIA/special forces pretending to be a cuban terrorist group" it would call itself a name people would believe to be a true cuban terrorist group, and both the government(99% of whom would believe it to be true) and the Media would act as if this group was a real group.
II-Under Operation Gladio in Europe, NATO intelligence murderer over a undred innocent italians while pretending to be communist terrorist groups. Acts included bombing in public transport mich like Madrid and London 7/7 (London 7/7 bombings coincided exactly with a terrorism exercise on the same day that prepared for bombs in the same places where the real bombs blew off)
These are 2 examples of planned or enacted false flag operations. In both of these the government and the media report events without reporting that they are directly or inderectly controled by the a small group withint the state itself and most of the government and media do not know.
Now as for 911:
a) There are indications of indirect links between the terrorists and western intelligence. The CIA pushed for some to get visas.
b) Both FBI and military intelligence had identified the 'presumed' terrorists before 911, and both investigations were stopped by superiors
c) several aspects related to the would be terrorist appears suspicious or does not match the official story
d) It is fancyfull to imagine the terrorists by themselves would have their own investigation stoped before 911, would happen to manoeuver around one of the most secure airspace in the world, on the specific day with multiple Norad/FAA exercises and on the day the National Reconnaince Office was evacuated in a drill, while Cheney was being brief periodically on an incoming aircraft(pentagon hit), etc, without some inside help.
Theres a lot more that contradics the official story or that shows the 911cr was full of ommissions(white wash).