- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 3587 Hour
- Reading permission
Originally posted by emucentral at 2007-3-28 21:13
I thought it was 10 million stolen Aborigines, nah, make it 100 million. Sounds much better. ...
You're funny, before the news came out, I think it's zero... oh, should be... can't say.
The "Western Media" to which you refer, was publishing allegations about a potential attack on Al Jazeera. By doing so they are exposing allegations of a plan to shut down non-western media.
Ohh? just how the 'western media' reported how 3 Al Jazeera staff shoot by US soldiers, since 'western' media already reported it. So it's okay, because they already exercise their 'press freedom'? Another disgusting 'so what mentality'. You reaction will be different if the reporter bombed is a white Australian.
So this "media bias" you claim to see is actually acting against western interests and making allegations about a western government official planning to destroy non-western media!
Ohh? You condemn and preach about China's in every possible occassion, What will you do now? Condemn Bush? Naaahhh...
He's one of your kind anyway, you're just a deputy of him.
If the western media was biased, as you allege, then wouldn't they be trying to hush up this plan, rather than exposing it?
Ohh? I don't talk specifically about media bias, I talk about intimidation toward non-western media. What will you do about it? It's already reported and you know it. Will you condemn and preach about human rights, freedom, bullsh*t etc etc to the bombers? Naahhh
You really are thick as two short planks, NW.
You are losing, emucc, with so much hypocrisy exposed, still you shamelessly condemn and preaching... but this is your habit, right?