Views: 113363|Replies: 42

China president demands the number of j20 be at least 100 by end of 2020 [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 4

Post time 2019-1-7 10:11:58 |Display all floors
That's like 2 more years.

Chengdu AVIC better speed up WS10b powered J20.  No time to waste.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-1-11 16:42:01 |Display all floors
No time to waste.

Trump is preparing for war on the advice of Taiwan hardliners like John Bolton.

The only way to avoid conflict and uphold the country's dignity is to have more J20s.

Russians T-34 tanks weren't as advanced as German Tiger Tanks in WWII.  Yet the Russians prevailed because of the sheer power of numbers -- the Russians built far more T-34 tanks than the Germans could match with their Tigers in the numbers game.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-1-23 08:39:31 |Display all floors
Bring it on!

美国一直用“出口伊朗”为借口, 企图消灭所有中国高科技公司,包括中兴华为。

美国和中国在高科技领域是在激烈竞争,而且竞争得你死我活的,但是用个没有证据的指控,动用政府的力量,把一位从来没有犯罪记录,有正当职业的全球知名公司的高管,当成刑事现行犯进行逮扑,司马昭之心路人皆知,就是标准的栽赃陷害污蔑。

加拿大这次选边站,在没有任何证据的情况下,帮美国逮扑孟晚舟,还借口按法律办事,实在很不要脸地破坏司法程序,用政治干涉司法。

中国政府不惜外交风险,勇敢地出面保护自己的海外公民,是一个负责任有担当的,为人民服务的好政府。如果这时候中国人还不站出来,一致声讨支援杯格加拿大的话,中国人以后在海外,就只能作外人的走狗汉奸卖国贼,才能苟且偷生了。

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-1-26 04:34:17 |Display all floors
Since Iran took the US embassy hostage there has been a strict policy of what can be shipped there. If you want to use US parts then you must adhere to the Iran no ship policy. Meng fraudulently change the books to ship to Iran. ZTE shipped to North Korea which we are technically still at war with. Again, if you want to use US parts for your products then you must adhere to US policy in regards to exports. If you don't then too bad, so sad.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-1-27 16:20:26 |Display all floors
Boston101 Post time: 2019-1-26 04:34
Since Iran took the US embassy hostage there has been a strict policy of what can be shipped there.  ...

Your argument has been presented ten thousand times and it still ain't going to work on the 10,001th attempt.

If you use this "parts-represent-the-whole" excuse then it can also be asserted that the U.S. has been illegally trading in offensive weaponry with Taiwan -- a renegade province of China -- a fact recognized by America in the Three Communiques emphasizing that there is only one China called the PRC and that Taiwan is part of that One China.

So if your claim here is allowed to stand, then turmoil would ensue with the Chinese government legally seizing the female CEO of Lockheed Martin in retaliation using the same rationale.

When you sell your parts to a business, those parts become the property of that business entity at the moment of the sale.  If you are uncomfortable with this arrangement then you shouldn't even be trading with that business at all.  

Companies like Qualcomm depend on sales to Chinese companies to keep themselves afloat.  That's the main reason why sales to ZTE were quickly restored after negotiations last year because if ZTE founders, Qualcomm would be looking at a huge financial loss.  

What the U.S. has done is to endanger the prospects of its own companies mulling over its own future purchase of Chinese parts since China is already the most innovative nation in the world in terms of patents filed and approved in the last two years, and the prospect of massive U.S. high-tech procurement from China is fast approaching.  

For instance, in the future there are bound to be unique AI-related electric-car parts that American companies will want to buy for their final assembly in Michigan.  Should China deny the sales of such parts to U.S. companies if they are suspected of trading with Taiwan or should she also seize the CEOs of U.S. companies during their transits through a third nation?

As to North Korea, Trump himself is talking to Kim Jr. and who are you to tell ZTE not to trade with the North before there were Security-Council-approved sanctions against that nation?

If there is a business conflict then the case should involve attorneys from both parties and shouldn't involve the seizure of executive officers like Meng.  

The very fact that Meng's arrest occurred on December 1, 2018 -- the same day that there was a scheduled meeting between the two leaders -- and the fact that Trump himself was offering 'help' at the crucial moment of the trade talks, proved beyond any reasonable doubt that it was a politically-motivated plot hatched in the minds of criminals camouflaged as hawks in Trump's entourage.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2019-1-27 16:30:00 |Display all floors
Since Iran took the US embassy hostage there has been a strict policy of what can be shipped there. If you want to use US parts then you must adhere to the Iran no ship policy. Meng fraudulently change the books to ship to Iran. ZTE shipped to North Korea which we are technically still at war with. Again, if you want to use US parts for your products then you must adhere to US policy in regards to exports. If you don't then too bad, so sad.


Your argument has been presented 10,000 times and it still ain't going to work on the 10,001st attempt.

If you use this "parts-represent-the-whole" excuse then it can also be asserted that the U.S. has been illegally trading in offensive weaponry with Taiwan -- a renegade province of China, a fact recognized by America in the Three Communiques emphasizing that there is only one China called the PRC and that Taiwan is part of that One China -- in selling Taiwan helicopters in which many electronic and non-electronic components were made in Mainland China.

So if your claim here is allowed to stand, then turmoil would ensue with the Chinese government legally seizing the female CEO of Lockheed Martin in retaliation using the same rationale.

When you sell your parts to a business, those parts become the property of that business entity at the moment of the sale.  If you are uncomfortable with this arrangement then you shouldn't even be trading with that business at all.  

Companies like Qualcomm depend on sales to Chinese companies to keep themselves afloat.  That's the main reason why sales to ZTE were quickly restored after negotiations last year because if ZTE founders, Qualcomm would be looking at a huge financial loss.  

What the U.S. has done is to endanger the prospects of its own companies mulling over its own future purchase of Chinese parts since China is already the most innovative nation in the world in terms of patents filed and approved in the last two years, and the prospect of massive U.S. high-tech procurement from China is fast approaching.  

For instance, in the future there are bound to be unique AI-related electric-car parts that American companies will want to buy for their final assembly in Michigan.  Should China deny the sales of such parts to U.S. companies if they are suspected of trading with Taiwan or should she also seize the CEOs of U.S. companies during their transits through a third nation?

As to North Korea, Trump himself is talking to Kim Jr. and who are you to tell ZTE not to trade with the North before there were Security-Council-approved sanctions against that nation?

If there is a business conflict then the case should involve attorneys from both parties and shouldn't involve the seizure of executive officers like Meng.  

The very fact that Meng's arrest occurred on December 1, 2018 -- the same day that there was a scheduled meeting between the two leaders -- and the fact that Trump himself was offering 'help' at the crucial moment of the trade talks, proved beyond any reasonable doubt that it was a politically-motivated plot hatched in the minds of criminals camouflaged as hawks in Trump's entourage.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2019-1-27 18:03:28 |Display all floors
What are you talking about??
Use US parts???
No China wants to replace it with domestic parts

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.