Views: 1644|Replies: 2

What will come out of the WTO review of U.S. trade policies? [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2018-12-17 17:24:13 |Display all floors
One of the World Trade Organization's functions is to resolve bilateral and multilateral trade disputes. Its 14th review of the recent trade policies and practices of the U.S. government will have a major impact on global free trade and the general tariff measures taken by every WTO member.

Although the U.S. government blocked the first request by some WTO members, such as China, the EU, and Canada, for a panel review by the WTO Dispute Resolution Body to determine whether U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum violates free trade rules, a second request has now been approved and the review will surely clarify the legal status of U.S. tariff measures.

According to Art.I.1 of the GATT adopted by the WTO, each member shall accord unconditionally with respect to customs duties and charges on all imports. This fundamental rule, also known as the “General Most-Favored-Nation” treatment, is put in place to promote free trade among contracting countries within the remit of the WTO. To put it simply, each member shall not unilaterally change domestic policies which may affect unconditional customs and duties on imports.

With the U.S. imposing tariffs on steel and aluminum, its unilateral policy violates the principle of free trade. Although the U.S. president defends his trade policy in the name of “trade deficits and unfair trade policies,” the illegitimacy of unilateral measures surely should not be accepted by the WTO and other member countries.

In addition, Art.II.1 of GATT provides that all member countries should follow the WTO “Schedules of Concessions” commitments, which are a general rule that establishes specific tariff concessions and commitments for a list of general goods regularly imported and exported in the international market.

As one of the achievements of WTO multilateral trade negotiation, the general rule demands every member country make sure their tariff levels are in accordance with their commitments to other contracting countries.

The list may change over time due to modifications, a statutory procedure demands a close examination of legal instruments and equal negotiations among relevant countries.

Therefore, no unilateral measures on tariffs by a single country would be accepted by the WTO as it violates the statutory procedure. Since the steel and aluminum are both general goods, the U.S. government should initiate the procedure and negotiate with other countries first instead of taking unilateral measures.

China, Canada, Mexico, Norway, Russia, Turkey and the EU have sent a request to the WTO Dispute Settlement for the second time, and the Dispute Settlement Body would then follow its procedure to examine the U.S. tariff measures.

Generally speaking, the review by the Dispute Settlement Body has two stages for settling disputes among disputing countries. The first, called the Consultation (up to 60 days), allows disputing parties to settle disputes themselves.

Considering the current circumstances, it is unlikely the U.S. government would settle with other countries. Hence, the review will most likely proceed to the second stage – the establishment of a panel which usually lasts for seven or eight months. The panel consists of experts who consider the given case and deliver the final report to the Dispute Settlement Body.

Such a report can only be rejected with a consensus in the Dispute Settlement Body, which generally speaking, is unlikely to happen.

In that case, the final report becomes a binding ruling. Since the panel experts strictly interpret the WTO rules and procedures, member countries that violate the rules or procedures rarely win in the panel's ruling. Consequently, the U.S. government is most likely to be ruled for violating the WTO rule on unilateral tariff measures.

The U.S. government, however, may opt to appeal the panel's ruling. This would add another three months to the entire process. Unfortunately for the U.S. government, the appeal only reviews legal issues from the perspective of law, which means no re-examination on existing evidence or a look at new issues. If the U.S. government lost in the panel ruling, the appeal result is most likely to be unfavorable to it again.

The rules of the WTO can ensure that the benefits of free trade are delivered, but it requires all member countries to comply with the rules. Unilateralism goes against the overall trend of global trade, leading to more distrust, conflicts and even trade wars. To the U.S. government, there is still time to correct its erroneous policies. (Source: CGTN)

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2018-12-19 00:20:42 |Display all floors
With the U.S. imposing tariffs on steel and aluminum, its unilateral policy violates the principle of free trade. Although the U.S. president defends his trade policy in the name of “trade deficits and unfair trade policies,” the illegitimacy of unilateral measures surely should not be accepted by the WTO and other member countries.


People who aren't used to consulting WTO regulations according to the rules book have always wondered how Trump could get away with unilateral imposition of tariffs upon general goods like steel and aluminum.

They shouldn't be surprised to find that the only reason Trump can get away with such tariffs is because he is a crime boss in the United Syndicate of America.

WTO rules stated very clearly that no country can unilaterally impose tariffs on the goods of another country without first resorting to consultation.

And to bend such rules by making false claims about the "unfair trade practices" of another country is to put the entire organization into jeopardy.

Remember that America itself enforced such rules from the very beginning and China negotiated for fifteen years before she was admitted to the international trade body under rules established by the hegemon.

Did anyone hear any complaints from the United Syndicates of America when manufactured Chinese goods benefited the low-income families of America in raising their living standards?

Nope.

Did anyone hear any complaints from the U.S.A. when its transnational countries reaped the lion's share of the profits day in and day out in its trade with China?

Nope.

So what has changed that has caused the Syndicate to change its mind?

Innovation.  

China is no longer just manufacturing shoes and sandals and earning ten cents out of a dollar of profit from the trade.

She is upping the ante in producing world-class high-tech goods after securing patents on many of its exports because of her technological advances resulting from the hard work of its highly-intelligent people and her hefty investments into core industries.

So I expect that unless the arbiter is an American Trumpster, a fair assessment and determination of the WTO rules will be obtained in the current hearings against the Crime Syndicate.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2018-12-19 15:18:07 |Display all floors
wchao37 Post time: 2018-12-19 00:20
People who aren't used to consulting WTO regulations according to the rules book have always wonde ...
WTO rules stated very clearly that no country can unilaterally impose tariffs on the goods of another country without first resorting to consultation.

And to bend such rules by making false claims about the "unfair trade practices" of another country is to put the entire organization into jeopardy.


Good point. This has been ignored by many discussions on the matter.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.