- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 66 Hour
- Reading permission
Scarlett Johansson Accuses Dylan Farrow of Lying|
- defending the right of the self-proclaimed "God's Chosen People" to commit crime
Faced with the decision to continue supporting the izraeli Sodastream company based in the occupied West Bank or Oxfam, Scarlett Johansson, chose to ditch Oxfam. Hollywood is still what Pat Buchanan might call "izraeli occupied territory", which is why Quentin Tarantino slandered Bruce Lee, even as he cited evidence which proved he was lying. In other words, they don't counter your accusations about their crimes, they counter-accuse, advertising the fact that it's gangster-thug retaliation. This is like war criminal, Mad Madelyne "worth it" Albright and her book of BS, titled "a warning from history". It's a gangster-thug threat not a warning.
Similarly, movies such as The Big Short (the Big Steaming Heap of Ruminant Turds, which can be further shortened to "The BS".) portrayed banksters as being completely innocent in the subprime crash despite Gary Cohn selling toxic waste to clients and then shorting them and one bankster resigning because he objected to the treatment of clients as marks, including calling them, "muppets". In the movie, Goldman Sachs was portrayed as the victim.
And just as a maid can be raped by a rutting ape Jew and completely fail to get a criminal trial, Johansson has denied Dylan Farrow a trial before deciding in favour of Allen, despite Allen marrying his other daughter who was adopted at age 8 and Dylan Farrow having consistently accused him for two decades that he molested her at age 7: Actress Scarlett Johansson has come out strongly in defence of director Woody Allen, saying she “loved” the film-maker and “believed” he is innocent of the abuse accusations made by his adopted daughter Dylan Farrow, The Guardian reported.
. . .
Johansson’s position is in clear opposition to actors such as Greta Gerwig, Timothee Chalamet and Colin Firth, all of whom expressed regret at working with Allen after the re-emergence of Farrow’s allegation of sexual abuse against him, the report said.
- Scarlett Johansson ‘believes’ Woody Allen
Similarly, the jewish-controlled, state-run BBC tells you what to think as it asks, "Why is billionaire George Soros a bogeyman for the hard right?"
That's like asking, "Why is Woody Allen a paedophile?" It's a loaded question claiming that only the "hard right" criticise his war crimes and acts of terrorism. And who are that "hard right" other than his fellow Jew, Andrew Breitbart?
He's a Jewish multi-billionaire philanthropist who has given away $32bn.
Yet they barely mention any good causes Schwartz has donated to. Instead, he overwhelmingly donates to terrorist cells such as the National Endowment for Democracy, the founders of which admit that they perform the "covert" activities once performed by the CIA (aka Murder Inc.), or propaganda cells such as Human Rights Watch. Neither does Giorgy Schwartz have any place telling nations what form of government they should be having. The likes of lewrockwell.com correctly point out that democracy is just mob rule. Neither is a democracy really viable as most voters don't know and don't care about current affairs.
Here's some really lame-assed "gaslighting": "Everything for him was a conspiracy theory, everything. George Soros was the one behind everything, he was the one buying the whole Democratic Party, he was the epicentre of what is going wrong in the United States of America."
Here's some more "philanthropy" formerly performed covertly by the CIA (aka Murder Inc.): Established in 1979, his Open Society Foundations now operate in more than 120 countries around the world. But this bold philanthropy in support of liberal, democratic causes has increasingly made him the bogeyman of the right.
This is why the terrorist has labelled president Xi the greatest threat to a "liberal society". Such obvious double-speak alone tells you he's a gangster.
Here's some self-contradictory BS: The theory claims white people are being replaced by immigrants and will ultimately be eliminated. It explains the neo-Nazis' chant, "Jews will not replace us!" as they marched through Charlottesville.
So which is it, "immigrants" or just Jews? This is like the propaganda claiming 1930s Germany were racist, but the Guardian (now an MI6 mouthpiece) admitted that captured african Amerikan pilots were saluted by Germans as officers. As late as the 1970s, the gangster-run, thieved prison-state of Auztralia had an OVERT whites-only infestation policy and John Pilger reports they continue TO THIS DAY to separate native Australians from their parents at birth in order to drive them out. John Bercow, who is stepping down as the poodle parliament's Speaker, supported the forced repatriation of non-whites in his early career but later, and disingenuously, claimed his policy based on skin-colour was "madness". The Great Satan had apartheid for "coloreds" until the 1960s. The Germans, like Alex Jones, were against jewish banksters, complaining of "jew confetti" which was imposed at the Genoa Conference in 1922 and then again in 1944 at Bretton Woods, before war criminal, Nixon defaulted in 1971, the biggest default in all of history.
Then the jewish-controlled, state-run BBC tells you why you believe Giorgy Schwartz is a terrorist and a war criminal. It's not because he was behind the illegal overthrow of the democratically elected ukrainian government where Amerikans changed their nationality to become part of the puppet government and where Victoria "F**k the EU" Nuland handed out cookies. No. There's NO mention of that in the propaganda article. The reason you think Giorgy Schwartz is a war criminal and a terrorist is because you've been brain-washed (in my case by someone I've never heard of and who's propaganda I've never encountered): Finkelstein created a new style of politics dubbed "Finkel Think", says Hannes Grassegger, a reporter for the Swiss publication, Das Magazin.
"Arthur Finkelstein always said, 'You don't go against the Taliban, you go against Osama Bin Laden.' So it's about personalisation, picking the perfect enemy and then [you] go full on against that person, so that people are actually scared of your opponent. And never talk about your own candidate's policies, they don't matter at all."
This is similar to how the propaganda rags describe the markets where they tell you that you invested in gold because it's a good hedge against uncertainty and not because the banksters are inflating at 10% rate (or 40% during QE).
The hungarian government agree with me: The Hungarian Government denies they needed anyone to "invent" Soros. In a statement it said: "George Soros invented himself as a political actor as long as two decades ago. George Soros's network of institutions exercises a great deal of power without a mandate coming from the people."
Chinese businessmen have also been victims of absurd propaganda accusing them of buying influence in the gangster-run, thieved prison-state of Auztralia, despite everyone knowing it, like the Great Satan, is what Pat Buchanan has been calling "izraeli occupied territory" for decades and anglo politics being completely founded on bribery! War criminals, Malcolm Rifkind and Billy Jefferson Hague were recently caught by a sting operation where they both offered favours for bribes. When Rose McGowan accused Harvey Weinstein of raping her, they accused her of leaving behind illegal drugs on a plane seat. BBC manager, Neil Masterson, physically assaulted George Galloway for speaking out against the illegitimate state of New Izrael. A discussion on the legitimacy of the illegitimate state of New Izrael was blocked. Max. Kiester says his only "editorial" instruction at the jewish-controlled, state-run BBC was that he wasn't allowed to mention the illegitimate state of New Izrael.