Author: linda_sun

How serious is academic fraud in China? [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2017-4-28 08:28:04 |Display all floors
seneca Post time: 2017-4-27 13:11
Yes, true. My best friends here wouldn't allow me not to.

Ditto...  

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2017-5-2 13:55:56 |Display all floors
BEWARE FAKE NEWS . . . ANY PROOF THAT THESE ARTICLES WERE UNTRUE?  JUST BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT PROPERLY PEER REVIEWED DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY MAKE THEM FALSE.  THIS CONCLUSION IS ITSELF FALLACIOUS.  HOW CAN TWO WRONGS MAKE A RIGHT?  EACH OF THESE ARTICLES SHOULD BE RE-REVIEWED BY PEERS, AND THEN IF PROVEN TO BE FALSE IN THEIR METHODS OR RESULTS, RETRACTED.  FAILURE OF PEER REVIEW IS A FAULT OF THE EDITOR AND PUBLISHER, NOT OF THE AUTHORS, IF ONE IS TO CALL A SPADE A SPADE.  

OF COURSE, THE ARTICLES COULD HAVE BEEN FALSE TOO, BUT NOT BECAUSE OF A FAULTY PEER REVIEW SYSTEM.  A BOILED EGG IS NO LESS OF AN EGG SIMPLY BECAUSE IT WAS CRACKED AT THE POINTED END, RATHER THAN AT ITS ROUNDED END.

Use magic tools Report

2018 Most Popular Member 2018 Most Popular Member 2016 Most Popular Member Medal Gold Medal

Post time 2017-5-2 17:55:21 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member 2015 Most Popular Member 2014 Most Popular Member

Post time 2017-5-3 12:43:35 |Display all floors
It's a was of life

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2017-5-5 12:15:31 |Display all floors
The fact of the matter is, the accuser has no clothes, and could not prove the articles false, even if he might possibly be justified in questioning the review process.  A failed police department does not make everyone a criminal.  These China haters need to be peer reviewed also.

Use magic tools Report

2018 Most Popular Member 2018 Most Popular Member 2016 Most Popular Member Medal Gold Medal

Post time 2017-5-5 12:47:56 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2017-5-6 14:10:20 |Display all floors
To have any article reviewed by the likes of Seneca is equivalent to subjecting one's intellect and integrity to rape and rapine by an inmate.  China's scientific papers do not need to be reviewed by foreign "peers".  They merely have to be honest and true.



Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.