- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 41 Hour
- Reading permission
Here's my review on My Fair Lady.|
I just went to watch the Oscar-awarded film that was shot more than forty years ago.
Casting aside romance which is not my favourite theme now, I don't enjoy the character of Prof. Higgins that he presented.
He was an arrogant, condescending egotist and misogynist as well. He hadn't a modicum of respect to the financially poor, socially humble girl-Eliza, who virtually represented her own class.
At the very beginning she was simply an object without soul in his experiment. After she left him, he did miss the young girl being his pet, but not being his love. He gloated at her misfortune with contempt in his illusory monologue. I believe if a person who was truly in love with someone would wish the best to her/him, even if they couldn't be together any more. How sick he was! And he still treated the girl like a maid whom he could kick around at will with the ending line asking her where his slippers were, that was so nauseating, though they would definitately get married in the imagination of most audience.
He opened a door to the upper-class for Eliza, where people dressed up for parties. Well, that world was too artificial for me to appreciate. When the party was over, they went home and truly showed their unseemly manner. I don't admire the life and those people at all.
Being a linguist, he knew how to polish his words and accent, but he was never a genuine gentleman in my own definition. There is no "respect" in the dictionary of Prof. Higgins, and he never learnt and never knew what it is all his life.
I'm not convinced in reality if Eliza, who had awared of her dignity, who was crying for being equal in soul, would finally return to Prof. Higgins if he failed to do some soul-searching. Obviously the film just tried to meet the expection and taste of (Western) audience's (in 1960s). It's more about fairy tale for adult audience. Good-looking Cinderella finally got married with the prince, and they happily live together ever since. I heard about the film was adapted from a drama by George Bernard Shaw, but it was pitifully a departure from the origin more or less.
The film reminds me of another novel named Jane Eyre, which is well known in China.
Why do you confide in me like this? What are you and she to me? You think that because I'm poor and plain, I have no feelings? I promise you, if God had gifted me with wealth and beauty, I would make it as hard for you to leave me now as it is for me to leave you. But He did not. But my spirit can address yours, as if both have passed through the grave and stood before heaven equal.
The two heroines shared the certain similarity in their own characters requesting for respect and equality, which every human being is supposed to deserve in any relationship, from the one they were in romantically love with. I'm not sure if Eliza would fall in love with Higgins. I assume it was more about attraction. What did she love Higgins for?
Jane Eyre was more impressive to me. I believe that Jane found her soulmate, but not Eliza.
I don't like the flower-selling girl Hepburn impersonated. I'm not convinced that people who are from lower class would behave so grossly yelling all the time. It must have been exaggerating. I understood it was a drama, but it would be a shame to demonise people of the lower class in the film which was awarded with Osar.
I got to know some Chinese peasants. They are not well-educated, and many of them don't behave genteelly, but sensibly.