Views: 8936|Replies: 19

Post-Industrial Economics with Chinese Characteristics - A New Look. [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2016-7-10 03:21:01 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2016-7-10 04:58

Traditional economic theory conveniently assigns four factors of production as being land, labor, capital and enterpreneurship (risk-taking activity), or maybe five, including technology.  The output is a product, which can be a good or a service.  In reality, the goods produced can in turn become factors of production, as could the services be used for further production.  This much is part of traditional economic theory.

What is logical for the firm, however, may be inadequate or incomplete for the country, in that for a country, labor should not be considered a mere factor of production, but also a product of consumption.  And this is very true in how upper class families employ maids and chaffeurs for their personal comfort and convenience.  The functionalities of cellphones and social media serve the needs of individuals to communicate with friends and family.  This much is standard fare for a consumption-driven economic theory.

But this too is inadequte to conceptualize the economy of a country as big as China that can be the equivalent of a small planet, that can subsist on its own for centuries, without trading with any country, if it chose to.

In fact, a sustainable economic model for a country like China has to be self-innovating, self-regenerating, and basically, remaining in self-equilibrium for as long as it wishes.

This article begins the debate about just one aspect of what a self-sustaining economy should be like in the context of the China of today, 1.35-billion-strong.  

Today, we will discuss the most important aspect of a self-sustaining economy, how to regenerate labor.  Here, we deviate from the tenets of Western economics, and posit that the ultimate aim of production efficiency is not to achieve the greatest profit (for the firm), but the redeployment of labor, freed from menial, boring or dangerous activities, toward the satisfaction of the higher and more sophisticated needs of the human being (for humanity).  

If machines can replace manual labor in producing cars, human labor should be re-deployed in using cars to satisfy the needs of the populace in traveling to see sights, to meet folks, or to coordinate business.  Of course, we have not yet reached that point, and labor is still needed in the production of cars.  But as Uber demonstrates, people need other people to drive cars for them, to even own the cars for them and maintain them.  As computers replace human calculators, they need programmers.  As programs are created, they need expert users, and so forth.  In short, one of the main objects of production is the production of jobs.  This is an essential part of the self-sustaining economy of the future that China should aim for - to produce ever more jobs, requiring less sweat, and permitting more human creativity and achieving not just satisfaction of basic needs for food, shelter, healthcare, transportation, communication, and clothing, but of higher needs to help those who are less fortunate in their biologic endowments or in their economic status, and such jobs should be jobs, not volunteered unpaid work.  Such jobs cannot be created by private enterpreneurs, because they do not generate profit for individuals.  Such jobs must be created by the state, because they generate benefit for the public.  This is the direction that reform of SOES needs to take seriously into account, in that the jobs they create did satisfy the basic needs of their workers, but the SOES should not be dismantled just because the private sector has finally caught up with the heavy industrial firms that formed the SOES, and can replace them with more efficient technology, and thus, leave the old SOES workers to find jobs on their own!  That would have been repaying the heroes of China's economic advances of the past with layoffs and starvation!  Rather, the SOES must ensure that each worker laid off a job that is replaced with technology with greater efficiency, can now work in another capacity at equal or better pay, to provide a new service based on the efficiencies created by China's new technological products.  Creating jobs is not easy, but it is an inescapable responsibility of the state, especially towards those who helped the country achieve its present day prosperity.  Farmers who fed the people using water buffaloes when mechanized equipment were not available should not be left to beg for food when mechanized farming becomes widespread.  Maybe, they should be given jobs as orderlies or guards of nursing homes for the aging population, where their work is much needed, as the young people are working at newer jobs now available, but not earning enough to employ them using their limited earnings yet.  Government subsidized healthcare workers may be the kind of labor now needed by a society able to replace 100 farmers with only 1 using mechanized farming tools.

The list can go on and on.  Things that the government says it does not have funds for, actually it does.  The government have to just assign a person in an old job at a SOES to another job that provides a service that modern equipment cannnot yet provide, such as basic nursing home care, that is now in great demand, as the traditional family structure is replaced by mobile nuclear families.  The money is there, the need is there, but it is up to the government to create the job and the training for it, to satisfy a social need that private enterpreneurship has no incentive to provide, maybe because its resources are better deployed at more profitable activities which the country ALSO needs.

So, please, do not follow the self-serving advice of Western economists to dismember the SOES and send their workers out with minimal guarantees and chances for re-employment.  Rather, create new SOES adapted to the location and resources of the regions where the old SOES are situated, build the facilities, provide the initial funding, and training, and then re-employ these workers in jobs that pay equally well, but require less hardship, to generate new services that the public needs but cannot yet obtain.  This is the meaning of regenerating LABOR, rather than simply destroying it or discarding it, like the wasteful ways of the old industrial countries, that leave in their wake a Chernobyl of demoralization, anger, and social injustice.

The need for human labor that machines cannot provide in healthcare and long term care of the elderly and disabled is something that should form the nidus of the new Chinese economy.  And, unlike the West that is embarrassed by its GDP reaching 18% spent in healthcare, China should choose to achieve it ahead of the world, because the purpose of all the economic prosperity of the country is not just to live, but to live healthily, and with as much comfort and convenience as its renewable resources and workforce can provide.  At that point, China would have the highest standard of living, without the cost, in the world.







Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2016-7-10 05:03:45 |Display all floors
From renewable resources, renewable energy, renewable environment, China should take the lead as the world's most populous country to champion RENEWABLE HUMAN LABOR by producing new jobs needing personal labor, including healthcare, management, education, and arts, for old workers of jobs replaced by machines.  

THE RENEWAL OF MAN IS THE ULTIMATE OBJECT OF PROGRESS.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member 2015 Most Popular Member 2014 Most Popular Member

Post time 2016-7-10 05:26:21 |Display all floors
Too long winded

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2016-7-10 05:47:45 |Display all floors
China certainly does an excellent job promoting and creating 'renewable human labor' with their new '2 children per family' rule. LOL!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2016-7-10 15:06:38 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2016-7-10 15:24
1105852048 Post time: 2016-7-10 05:47
China certainly does an excellent job promoting and creating 'renewable human labor' with their new  ...

Time to throw Western economic theory into the garbage bin of history, most of which are long-winded apologias for their self-interests.  Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations merely justifies the taking of the wealth of other nations for free through imposing unwanted, unjust and unfair trade on unwilling countries by use of force.  The current theory of production reflects the exploitative and uncompassionate use of the manpower and natural resources of other countries, "justified" by the profit motive, aka the "invisible hand" of thievery, and naturally after their usefulness has been exhausted, they are slated to be discarded.

China does not need exploitative economics to be applied to her own self, her own people, for the benefit of foreign powers, or to please foreign bankers.

A worker whose job has been made obsolete by new technology does not have to be thrown away together with his old machine.  China should refuse to accept the inevitability or necessity of a human junkyard where displaced labor is dumped to undergo the decay of poverty, illness and death.  Western economics has no compassion for the colonial worker being discarded with his rickshaw.  Chinese economics does.  That is why there is the country of modern China, which was formed by the rickshaw coolies, who by dint of hard work, have created a new generation of rocket scientists.  That, is renewal of manpower.  That, is defending the dignity of man.  That, is the sum of all human rights, crystallized in the right of every Chinese to live, on his own land, under his own roof, wearing his own clothes.

Do not throw the baby out with the bathwater.  Do not get rid of SOES when they become unprofitable.  Instead, create more human-dependent jobs that machines cannot do, like healthcare, nursing home care, education, communication, and arts, and yes, even religion (not cults of worshiping a supreme leader or his representative).  Basic science research, mathematics, and even philosophy, are foundations of human civilization that cannot be measured by the Western economic yardstick of the bottom line, that colonial companies measure their success with.  SOES should be supported with state funds even if they cannot sell their services for profit.  There are many such activities that are both necessary and unprofitable, such as defense and peace and order activities.  Public health is yet another.  Every SOE that has been made obsolete by private enterprise, should be viewed as an OPPORTUNITY to create another SOE to employ human beings in activities that private enterprise will not attempt, but which nevertheless benefits the public.

Replace the concept of "creative destruction" with "creative renewal" and with the mantra of renewal, China shall never lack for a job for any of its people, nor any job lack for a benefit to the country.

Should the SOES be whittled to nothing?  Heck, no!  New SOES should be created to replace obsolete SOES.  But, unlike the colonial economics of the invisible hand that takes and does not replace, China's post-industrial economics should be designed around the recycling of its vast manpower resource such that no man shall want for a job, and no job want for a benefit to the country.  Old jobs can be terminated.  Old workers, however, must be re-trained and re-used to produce new goods and services.  New jobs for old workers should be the aim of economic progress in the New China.  The bottom line is not the measure of economic success for a country.  The employment rate is.



Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2016-7-10 15:55:59 |Display all floors
That is a noble and interesting proposition. Channeling resources like labour to other industries where labour is needed is a good idea. However, one thing to keep in mind is that labour is not that flexible. For example, there may be a need for labour in the taxi industry such as Uber and there is also a need for labour in the health industry or IT industry. In the case of Uber, the vacancy can be more easily filled since learning to drive is not so difficult for many. In the case of health or IT industry, it may not be so easily filled since not many have the aptitude for such jobs even with training.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2016-7-10 17:46:11 |Display all floors
abramicus Post time: 2016-7-10 05:03
From renewable resources, renewable energy, renewable environment, China should take the lead as the ...

American Wall Street corporations should pull out of China and invest in India.  India with superhuman power will out produce any country in the world with their most dedicated and intelligent workforce.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.