Author: abramicus

THANKS TO THE HONG KONG POLICE FOR RE-OPENING HONG KONG'S ROADS! [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-10-18 06:56:35 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2014-10-18 07:14

THE RETURN OF THE STOOGES CAN BE PREDICTED WITH 100% ACCURACY BECAUSE THEIR HIRE HAS NOT ENDED, AND THEIR BOSSES REALIZED LEUNG AND LAM WILL NEVER HARM A HAIR ON THEIR HEAD EVEN IF THEY PULL OUT THE TEETH FROM THE HELPLESS POLICEMEN.

THE ERROR IN THE STRATEGY OF LEUNG AND LAM, AND, WE CANNOT BLAME HIM AND HER ALONE, BUT SHOULD INCLUDE THAT OF THEIR SUPERVISORS, HUDDLED SOMEWHERE IN SHENZHEN, IS THAT THEY MADE IT VERY CLEAR THAT THEY ARE AFRAID OF USING MORE THAN THE MINIMUM FORCE TO UPHOLD THE PUBLIC LAW AND SAFEGUARD THE PUBLIC ROADS AND BUILDINGS OF HONG KONG.

AND, THEY HAVE GIVEN THEMSELVES NO ACHIEVABLE LASTING OBJECTIVE OTHER THAN THE MERE DEPARTURE OF THE FOREIGN STOOGES FROM THE STREETS OF CENTRAL AND MONG KOK.

I HAVE SAID BEFORE, AND SAY IT AGAIN, "OCCUPY CENTRAL IS NOT OVER UNTIL ARTILE 23 IS FULLY IMPLEMENTED."

THINK!  IF WITHIN THE 3 DAY LULL BETWEEN THE DEFEAT OF THE STOOGES AND THEIR RETURN, THE HONG KONG LEGCO WOULD HAVE PASSED A "NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY LAW" THAT PUNISHES ANY ACT THAT INSULTS, OPPOSES, CONTRADICTS, IGNORES, RIDICULES OR REJECTS THE SOVEREIGNTY OF CHINA IN HONG KONG WITH AUTOMATIC INVALIDATION OF THEIR CHINESE CITIZENSHIP, PERMANENT RESIDENCY, AND ALL TYPES OF VISA STATUSES, BY THE HKSAR (FOR RESIDENCY) AND BY THE CENTRAL CHINESE GOVERNMENT (FOR CITIZENSHIP AND VISAS), THEN THEY WOULD HAVE A NON-PHYSICAL, NON-BLOODY WEAPON TO DEFEND THE SOVEREIGNTY OF CHINA IN HONG KONG WITH. BY USING THE LATEST MEDIA TECHNOLOGY, AND MERELY TAKING PICTURES, THUMBPRINTS, AND OTHERWISE IDENTIFYING THE FIRST 3 ROWS OF ANY ILLEGAL PROTEST AGAINST THE EXERCISE BY CHINA OF ITS SOVEREIGNTY IN HONG KONG - WITH INSTANT CANCELLATION OF ALL THEIR RIGHTS TO STAY IN HONG KONG, CHINA - CHINA WOULD NOT NEED TO  REMOVE THEM FROM THE STREETS WHERE THEY ARE GUARDED BY FOREIGN MEDIA GOONS.  THEY  COULD BE DEPORTED FROM THEIR HOMES, FROM SUPERMARKETS WHERE THEY SHOP, FROM SCHOOLS THEY USE AS THEIR HEADQUARTERS, AND FROM THEIR MEETING PLACES.   THE HKSAR GOVERNMENT COULD TAKE THE WAR OVER THE SOVEREIGNTY OF CHINA IN HONG KONG FROM THE STREETS TO THEIR HOMES, AND THENCE TO THE AIRPORTS AND SEAPORTS, AND REMOVE THEM AS PERSONA NON GRATA FROM CHINA'S SOVEREIGN SOIL THAT THEY DO NOT RECOGNIZE AS BELONGING TO CHINA ANYWAY.

  IT IS TIME FOR CHINA TO TAKE THE WAR TO THE REBELS, AND NOT LET THE REBELS TAKE THEIR WAR TO THE HEARTLAND OF HONG KONG OR THE REST OF CHINA.  

TO LEUNG AND LAM, AND THEIR SUPERVISORS, THE CHINESE PEOPLE ARE WATCHING YOUR EVERY MOVE.  YOU HAVE DELAYED TO THE LAST MINUTE THE REMOVAL OF THE BARRICADES.  DO NOT DELAY BEYOND THE LAST MINUTE TO IMPLEMENT ARTICLE 23, WHEN THE ONLY RECOURSE OF CHINA AND OF THE HKSAR WOULD NOT BE THE LETTER OF THE LAW, BUT THE POINT OF THE BULLET.


Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-10-18 07:45:58 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2014-10-18 07:52

The "Rule of Law" is possible only if there is a LAW TO RULE WITH.

Without implementing Article 23 of the Basic Law, no matter how well intentioned the leaders of China and HKSAR may be, they cannot stop the foreign-instigated insurrection through using the "Rule of Law".

The Law Enforcers, no matter how disciplined and loyal, are powerless without a LAW TO ENFORCE.

FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE LAW EVEN AT THIS LATE HOUR, WHEN THE VERY SUBVERSION, SEDITION AND SECESSION OF HONG KONG IS IN PROGRESS, WILL INEVITABLY FORCE CHINA TO APPLY FORCE WITHOUT A LAW TO BACK IT UP WITH, AND BE BLAMED FOR DEFENDING HER SOVEREIGNTY THROUGH THE ARBITRARY USE OF "EXCESSIVE FORCE".

With a "National Sovereignty Law" in place, law enforcement can take place at the homes of the rebels, at their schools, at their private meeting places, with minimum use of physical force, but effectively take them out of the streets, as would otherwise be achievable only with sending in thousands of police officers to clear up even more thousands of stooges.  This wouuld be extremely hard to achieve if they are outnumbered 10:1, and they not only may not succeed in doing it, but will certainly become the subject of Western media condemnation and ridicule.

Once the "National Sovereignty Law" is passed, the first people to be deported should be all the foreign media who have been directing, and producing, the insurrection as a Reality Show, called, "Occupy Central", and right thereafter, the money men should follow.  

Without money, the whole circus will simply fall apart, as it never came from the will of the Hong Kong people, 99.8% of whom have not joined the Occupy Central or Occupy Mong Kok foreign-backed stooges.  The overwhelming majority of Hong Kongers are opposed to the Occupy Central clowns and their circus masters.

IF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND THE LEGCO KNOW THAT CHINA WANTS TO SOLVE THE INSURGENCY WITH THE RULE OF LAW, THEN WHY HAS THE LEGCO NOT YET PASSED A LAW IMPLEMENTING ARTICLE 23 AFTER 17 YEARS, TO THIS VERY MINUTE?  DO YOU DIG A WELL ONLY AFTER THE HOUSE IS ON FIRE?  WELL THE HOUSE IS ABOUT TO BE SET ON FIRE.  WHY ARE YOU STILL NOT DIGGING THE WELL???



Use magic tools Report

Rank: 3Rank: 3

Post time 2014-10-18 08:47:40 |Display all floors
Wow! You really need to find something useful to do with your time/life. I don't mean to be disrespectful, but wow! Man overboard!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-10-18 11:28:21 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2014-10-18 11:58

"RULE OF LAW" IS BASED ON THE UNIVERSAL FACT THAT LAWS ARE CREATED TO REMEDY VIOLATIONS OF LEGAL RIGHTS (OR, "THERE OUGHT'A BE A LAW!")

We have seen a massive, pervasive, continuous violation of the legal rights of the residents of Hong Kong, not just those living in Hong Kong Central or in Mong Kok although they were the most severely affected, but also the legal rights of those traveling through these areas to go to their places of work, study or their homes.  The legal rights of store owners to a legitimate return on their investments based on the normal availability of customers passing by their stores were severely violated as well.  Above all, the dignity of the national government, and the sovereignty of China, have been brutally violated by the Western media producers and distributors of this under handed attack on the soul of a nation, through their trashing of its child, Hong Kong, in front of the whole wide world.

When we see such a massive violation of the legal rights of law-abiding citizens in Hong Kong, and realize that the HKSAR does not have a law to remedy such violations when committed by clowns trained by foreign powers who feed them and fawn on them in their newspapers and TV shows, anybody worth his salt in jurisprudence should point out to the LegCo, the Chief Executive and the National People's Congress that THERE MUST BE A LAW AGAINST THE VIOLATION OF THE ECONOMIC AND PERSONAL RIGHTS OF MILLIONS OF HONG KONGERS, AND THE DAILY INSULTS TO EVERY CHINESE HONG KONGER'S RIGHT TO BE THE KING OF HIS OWN CASTLE, EVEN IF DONE IN THE NAME OF WESTERN DEMOCRACY, AND SUPPORTED BY WALL STREET JUNK AND NEW YORK TRASH, ETC.

China should be commended for wanting to use the RULE OF LAW in resolving the current situation.

But China needs to understand that in order to implement the RULE OF LAW, it must first have a law or a set of laws that specify the REMEDY FOR THE INDIVIDUALS, THE BUSINESSES, THE CORPORATIONS, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT WHOSE LEGAL RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED.

And, there is either NONE, or a few trivial laws that allow for pennies on the dollar remedies, as has already been seen in a few initial cases, of a few hundred Hong Kong dollars for loss of a week of income, that now has dragged to three weeks!

This is embarrassing.  It tells the world that contrary to what it says about China not respecting individual rights, China does not know how to remedy violations against its people's individual and collective rights, by creating effective and practicable laws.  To address the issue of the Occupy Central violation of the individual rights and collective rights of the people of Hong Kong and of China in general, the broadest conception of the harm suffered by all Hong Kongers must be first attained, and this requires a complete consideration of the relationship between the SOVEREIGNTY OF CHINA and the CITIZENSHIP OF THE VIOLATOR.  To wit, the two issues are like Siamese twins, they are two sides of the same coin.  The person who pays with a coin that is marked by its defacement of the sovereignty of China, cannot use the same coin to pay for his rights of citizenship, permanent residence, or even a visa of any type that is issued by China.  Just writing up penalties for specific infractions will not do.  They punish the individual but do not remedy the wounds sustained by the nation's sovereignty.  Such sovereignty can be made whole again only with the expulsion of the scars and cuts made on its face, which are the subversives, seditionists, secessionists and traitors, instantaneously, completely, and permanently.

Once this fact is fully understood and applied, then the resolution of the individual remedies for each and every Hong Kong resident whose legal rights were violated by the foreign stooges can be achieved with much greater ease and fairness.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.