Author: abramicus

THE OCCUPY CENTRAL MOVEMENT IS NOT OVER UNTIL ARTICLE 23 IS IMPLEMENTED! [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-10-14 17:20:16 |Display all floors
THE "OCCUPY CENTRAL" INSURRECTION IS NOT OVER UNTIL HONG KONG PASSES ITS VERSION OF THE NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY LAW, IN MANDATORY FULFILLMENT OF ITS DUTY UNDER THE BASIC LAW'S ARTICLE 23.

THE LAW SHOULD BE SIMPLE ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND, EASY ENOUGH TO IMPLEMENT, AND BROAD ENOUGH TO APPLY TO EVERY CASE OF SUBVERSION, INSURRECTION, SECESSION OR TREASON.

HERE IS A DRAFT OF SUCH A LAW THAT CAN HAVE ANY TITLE, BUT EVEN THE TITLE SHOULD PROJECT THE CORE PRINCIPLE OF THE LAW - AND ARTICLE 23 OF THE BASIC LAW IS ALL ABOUT NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, THEREFORE:

BE IT RESOLVED IN THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA:


TITLE:  NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY LAW

PREAMBLE:  Sovereignty of China in Hong Kong is a fact, acceptance of which is a prerequisite to the validity of the Chinese citizenship, permanent residency, or visa status of all persons in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.

Article 1:  Any act of denial, rejection, objection, questioning, ignoring, contradiction, opposition and insult to the sovereignty of China in Hong Kong is a crime of Lese Majeste, and is a sufficient basis for voiding of permanent residency status by the HKSAR, and of citizenship and visa status by the Central Government of China, not subject to judicial review.

Article 2:  All other violations of public law and private properties in Hong Kong SAR shall be handled according to public laws and regulations.


DURING THE NEXT LEGCO MEETING, LET THERE BE AN UP AND DOWN VOTE ON THIS LEGISLATION THAT WOULD REQUIRE NO DEBATE, BECAUSE IT IS A SIMPLE AFFIRMATION OF THE DELEGATE HIMSELF OR HERSELF THAT HE OR SHE ACCEPTS THE SOVEREIGNTY OF CHINA IN HONG KONG WITHOUT ANY RESERVATIONS, AND IS A BASIC REQUIREMENT OF HIS OR HER OWN CITIZENSHIP, AND QUALIFICATIONS FOR OFFICE.

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2014-10-14 17:26:58 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-10-14 17:31:59 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2014-10-14 17:34

In order to get this simple, effective and indispensable legislation into LegCo, Leung and Lam must either push for it publicly and privately, or step down.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 3Rank: 3

Post time 2014-10-14 17:55:23 |Display all floors
determine who are visitor?-   that's enough..

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2014-10-14 18:04:26 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-10-14 19:22:34 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2014-10-14 19:27
Dacarys Post time: 2014-10-14 17:55
determine who are visitor?-   that's enough..

The problem is not who is a visitor, but rather, who is a citizen.  Those who reject the sovereignty of China in Hong Kong, even if they were born as Chinese citizens, do not qualify to be citizens, and therefore, may not vote or be elected.  Citizenship by birth can be negated by Citizenship by choice.  Asking those who want to vote or be elected if they do choose to be Chinese citizens or not, and verifying it by their actions, eliminates 99% of the candidates supported by foreign powers in Hong Kong.  

Visitors, on the other hand, have no right to vote or be elected, so identifying them does not eliminate the candidates supported by foreign powers in Hong Kong.  Your proposal to only identify the visitors means giving the foreign plants a free hand to vote and to be elected, and does not merit a "JUST" rather a "REALLY?"

As a simple example, if you are the usher to a movie theater, if you only check those who have no tickets in the lobby, you would not know who amongst the audience has a ticket.  You still have to check the ticket to be sure every one entering the theater is qualified to be there.  Leung would be admitting all the foreign plants into positions of HongKong government, if he does not icheck the actuality of the citizenship of every person seeking to vote or to hold office.  Artcle 23 cannot be implemented without addressing the issue of sovereignty based on the issue of citizenship, and vice versa, thus linking them inseparably - this was the missing ingredient in the past versions of the National Security Act proposed to implement Article 23 - it got lost in the trees and missed the forest.  Now, the forest is found, and it must be forever secured!


Use magic tools Report

Post time 2014-10-15 03:24:12 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked
   NEVER AGAIN  !

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.