Author: abramicus

THE OCCUPY CENTRAL MOVEMENT IS NOT OVER UNTIL ARTICLE 23 IS IMPLEMENTED! [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-10-7 11:02:55 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2014-10-7 11:05

THE MYSTERY IS WHY LEUNG IS SEEMINGLY OBLIVIOUS OF THE DETERMNATION OF THE INSTIGATORS OF THE OCCUPY CENTRAL REBELLION TO BRING ABOUT AN ULTIMATE COLLAPSE OF GOVERNMENT IN HONG KONG THROUGH ANARCHY AND IS CURRENTLY NEGOTIATING WITH TRAITORS WHO CAN NEVER BE CONVERTED TO BECOMING LOYAL CITIZENS EVER!

THIS IS A FIGHT TO THE FINISH, AND IF HE BELIEVES THIS IS THE END OF THE FOREIGN SUBVERSION OF HONG KONG, THEN EITHER HE IS NOT SMART OR HE IS ALSO NOT LOYAL.

SENECA SAID IT WELL, HE HATES CHINA AND A HONG KONG THAT BELONGS TO CHINA.  IT IS SO OBVIOUS EVEN BEFORE SENECA SAID IT.  HOW CAN A DEFENDER OF THE SOVEREIGNTY OF CHINA IN HONG KONG EVER IMAGINE IT IS POSSIBLE TO NEGOTIATE WITH TRAITORS.  FOR THIS REASON, THE RECENT ARTICLE OF REGINA IP PUTTING THE STUDENTS IN A BALMY LIGHT MAKES HER TRANSFORMATION FROM A PATRIOT TO SOMEONE LESS AFTER HER STINT AT STANFORD SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT SERIOUSLY.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 1

Post time 2014-10-8 17:01:27 |Display all floors
Hi Abramicus:

You are a great man .

You have my support. HK Leaders are too weak to implement Article 23 on their own. They need a push from China.  President Xi JinPing to givr the signal to JUST GO AHEAD. So Please, HK Leaders, we are giving you the moral support to JUST GO AHEAD TO PUSH FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 23.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-10-9 09:14:26 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2014-10-9 11:07

Recent revelations from Australia about the business dealings of Leung throws some light on his background that even Chinese top leaders may not have known anything about.  They do not prove any wrong was done.  It only showed that there is some deficiency in China's knowledge of his backers, friends, and partners.  In fact, such dealings could have been used to blackmail him to bow to Western demands.  By the Australian activists blowing the cover, such blackmail becomes a lot harder to carry out, but by no means impossible, if the news were suppressed, as it seems to be by now, in less than 24 hours of its being published.  From black to white, and now back to black.

The barricades are still up, despite their providing China no benefit in terms of control of the ultimate outcome of the Occupy Central movement.  They are a huge liability for China, actually, as the inevitable "walk out" and "breakdown" of the talks between the HKSAR and the traitors would give the foreign stooges more "reasons" to mount a second wave of protest, swarming more students and adults into their permanent bastion of barricades, dutifully preserved for them by the HKSAR, none other.

There is a subtext being rumored in the Chinese news circuit, that all this dragging out and delay of a resolution of the Occupy Central could have been a ruse to force Xi to take a stand, and accept the responsibility for defusing it, after which the foreign operatives would then ADAMANTLY DEMAND CHINA TO BACK DOWN ON VETTING ITS CANDIDATES FOR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF HKSAR - forcing the outcome to either of two alternatives: (1) China loses its right to veto any pro-Western nominee for the Chief Executive post, or (2) China would have to enforce its sovereignty by sending in the PLA, which would risk losses of lives, and foreign condemnation.

The best solution is for China to appoint an "interim Chief Executive" who would proceed to dismantle the barricades, take all the blame and the glory too, and leave China and HKSAR with a better set of choices than it now has.

Preferably, he should convene the LegCo and pass the simplified National Sovereignty Law posted in this forum, that stipulates acceptance of China's sovereignty in Hong Kong as the prerequisite for continued validity of any claims of Chinese citizenship, permanent residence or visa privilege for anyone in Hong Kong.  China must define who is a valid voter in any election, and what a valid voter must have to be a voter, which in all countries, must be proof of citizenship, implied by which is acceptance of the sovereignty of the country in the location where he intends to vote.

Thus, we see no real effort by either Leung or his supervisors in Beijing to bring the Occupy Central protest to a permanent close, as there is absolutely no effort on anyone's part to bring about the implementation of Article 23, that this traumatic experience of Hong Kong teaches is critical to its peace, order and prosperity.








Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-10-14 17:07:47 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2014-10-14 17:15


THE "OCCUPY CENTRAL" INSURRECTION IS NOT OVER UNTIL HONG KONG PASSES ITS VERSION OF THE NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY LAW, IN MANDATORY FULFILLMENT OF ITS DUTY UNDER THE BASIC LAW'S ARTICLE 23.

THE LAW SHOULD BE SIMPLE ENOUGH TO UNDERSTAND, EASY ENOUGH TO IMPLEMENT, AND BROAD ENOUGH TO APPLY TO EVERY CASE OF SUBVERSION, INSURRECTION, SECESSION OR TREASON.

HERE IS A DRAFT OF SUCH A LAW THAT CAN HAVE ANY TITLE, BUT EVEN THE TITLE SHOULD PROJECT THE CORE PRINCIPLE OF THE LAW - AND ARTICLE 23 OF THE BASIC LAW IS ALL ABOUT NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, THEREFORE:

BE IT RESOLVED IN THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA:


TITLE:  NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY LAW

PREAMBLE:  Sovereignty of China in Hong Kong is a fact, acceptance of which is a prerequisite to the validity of the Chinese citizenship, permanent residency, or visa status of all persons in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.

Article 1:  Any act of denial, rejection, objection, questioning, ignoring, contradiction, opposition and insult to the sovereignty of China in Hong Kong is a crime of Lese Majeste, and is a sufficient basis for voiding of permanent residency status by the HKSAR, and of citizenship and visa status by the Central Government of China, not subject to judicial review.

Article 2:  All other violations of public law and private properties in Hong Kong SAR shall be handled according to public laws and regulations.


DURING THE NEXT LEGCO MEETING, LET THERE BE AN UP AND DOWN VOTE ON THIS LEGISLATION THAT WOULD REQUIRE NO DEBATE, BECAUSE IT IS A SIMPLE AFFIRMATION OF THE DELEGATE HIMSELF OR HERSELF THAT HE OR SHE ACCEPTS THE SOVEREIGNTY OF CHINA IN HONG KONG WITHOUT ANY RESERVATIONS, AND IS A BASIC REQUIREMENT OF HIS OR HER OWN CITIZENSHIP, AND QUALIFICATIONS FOR OFFICE.

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2014-10-14 17:09:30 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2014-10-14 17:12:16 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2014-10-14 17:14:39 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.