Author: DrMao

CHina still long way from Carrier operation; lacking AWACS n number of J15. [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member 2015 Most Popular Member 2014 Most Popular Member

Post time 2014-9-22 15:16:45 |Display all floors
raton Post time: 2014-9-22 15:06
and as if the Chinese will tell the west how they are cooking the soup ..!  Be realistic, followin ...

That is the same logic as the fictional Starfleet

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2014-9-22 15:53:59 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member 2015 Most Popular Member 2014 Most Popular Member

Post time 2014-9-22 16:21:29 |Display all floors
zjjhpj Post time: 2014-9-17 22:20
So China's first carrier always activity at the ranged of the China's Air Force .........

China's first carrier is a training tool and flag waving propaganda nothing more, it spends most of its time in port or close to land.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member 2015 Most Popular Member 2014 Most Popular Member

Post time 2014-9-22 17:06:13 |Display all floors
magnetic1974 Post time: 2014-9-17 23:20
China will get at least 5 aircraft carriers, However I think  China is more focus  on  capable nuc ...

1 Aircraft carries 5000 personnel
2 guided missile cruses 800 personnel
1 frigate 400 personnel
2 submarines 220 personnel
2 supply ships 900 personnel
That is 8 ships for a basic carrier group and
That is 7,320 personnel
Now you need to times these numbers by 5. The Peoples Liberation Army Navy has no experience operating one carrier group, let alone 5 carrier groups. Where will all this experience come from at all levels of the rank structure.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-9-22 22:06:31 |Display all floors
dusty1 Post time: 2014-9-22 01:06
1 Aircraft carries 5000 personnel
2 guided missile cruses 800 personnel
1 frigate 400 personnel



>>>1 Aircraft carries 5000 personnel

with that of the cv-16 class, cut that number down to 1\5 or 1\4...


>>>2 guided missile cruses 800 personnel

lower the count here as well. p.l.a.n. does not offer maître d's and chambermaid services ...


>>>1 frigate 400 personnel

u.s.n. numbers... i.e., a simple bolt that cost rmb 20 yuen inflated to usd 20k by the time it gets put into their f-16's?


>>>2 submarines 220 personnel

fair enough and fair enough only if you're talking about those of the jin class or better... mings (anti-ship missiles platforms), songs (anti-ship\cruise missile platforms), yuans (anti-ship\cruise missile platforms), and the newly commissioned cruise missile\and ballistic missile platform qing class should be 1\3 to 1\2 that number...


>>>2 supply ships 900 personnel

this is where the numbers are under estimated... i estmate the numbers here to be much higher but, personnel cost is dirt cheap in china and no strikes of pickets for china to have to worry about so don't you worry...  the costs here are part of the landscape of the makings of what are kevin cosner's water world so don't you worry on our behalf...


>>>That is 8 ships for a basic carrier group and

by 2025, which are the time frame beijing had set as a target, this number (8 ship groupy) should have increase two fold to include other submerged and surface elements, i.e., new class of subs, uav's and u"c"av's, drone operators by the hundreds, as the aircraft carrier will slowly but surely be phased out and replaced by stealthy platforms dedicated to cruise missiles and ballistic missiles in the nature in that of the u.s.n's ddg-1000 or better, therefore you just can't put a numerical standard on this or anything ten years from now...


>>>That is 7,320 personnel

again, that is american\u.s.n. numerical standards... it's idiotic to apply this number to everyone because, this number is different for russia, different for france, different for brazil, different for india, and, naturally, it's different for the p.l.a.n...


>>>Now you need to times these numbers by 5...

by 2025, the number, based on chinese standards, will increase "not five times" as you hypothesis, more rather, if my suspicion won't be not track, it will instead increase 10 folds... don't forget: zhanghe had an armda of some 3000 battleships and frigates and that's centuries ago... i have to speculate that that have to be the rought number beijing is trying to target before she relax herself again...


>>>The Peoples Liberation Army Navy has no experience operating one carrier group, let alone 5 carrier

groups. Where will all this experience come from at all levels of the rank structure...
we have plenty geeks, techies, rambos, and tom cruises in our midst as well... i mean your question is a silly one... it amounts to the same as asking a guy or gal from the 21st century the question you've never has sex with that women something'sky, how are you going to know what to do when some kidman or j. lo comes on to you...



Putin's a killer. This was the claim made by Fox News journalist; Bill O'Reilly during his recent interview with Donald Trump. Trump's reply came in the form of a simple question. What, you think our country's so innocent?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-9-23 02:54:49 |Display all floors
This post was edited by edisonone at 2014-9-22 11:08
dusty1 Post time: 2014-9-22 00:21
China's first carrier is a training tool and flag waving propaganda nothing more, it spends most o ...

what do you want for us to do with our cv-16, dusty? should we start launching air strikes randomly at anyone and everyone we feel like it with our flatdeck?

hey! that's (not the cv-16 way) dusty. our cv-16 is there for defensive purposes and for the maintainance of peace (peace not only for china, but for the whole of the asia pacific because the asia pacific is asia's turf) and as asians, we have a duty to ensure the peace there if it's within our means to do so.

bottom line: eat your heart out if you are in disbute or in disagreement with china's rise, dusty, because (life goes on regardless if you like our rise or not). simply put: you'll just have to put up with what life throws at you, dusty, because everyone have to!

Putin's a killer. This was the claim made by Fox News journalist; Bill O'Reilly during his recent interview with Donald Trump. Trump's reply came in the form of a simple question. What, you think our country's so innocent?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-9-23 03:26:32 |Display all floors


C'mon Boys! It's pointless to argue here. You see, what we are witnesing is a totally new disease that's making its way into the CD board here - a disease that can best describe as "the dusty syndrome" - a disease more distructive than both sars and ebola combined - a disease that eats up the brains masses of dudes like our man dusty...
Putin's a killer. This was the claim made by Fox News journalist; Bill O'Reilly during his recent interview with Donald Trump. Trump's reply came in the form of a simple question. What, you think our country's so innocent?

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.