Readers’ Blog

Why Kunduz Fell

Viewed 875 times 2016-10-10 20:59 |Personal category:for discussion|System category:Others| successful, conducted, recently, relative, capital

Why Kunduz Fell



10 October 2016.




As recently as three years ago, Kunduz Province appeared to be a bastion of relative stability in Afghanistan. Clearing operations conducted by conventional infantry units, direct action SOF raids, and an apparently successful local militia program had wreaked havoc on the insurgency in Kunduz. The Taliban abruptly shattered that perception in the early morning hours of September 28, 2015 when they seized Kunduz City-the first provincial capital to fall since the U.S.-led invasion of 2001. Warnings signs reflecting latent instability in Kunduz were plentiful, however, and the fall of the provincial capital should not have come as a surprise. The reality, evidently unperceived by both U.S. and Afghan government officials, was that the Taliban had been patiently setting the conditions to capture Kunduz City as early as 2012. Though only a year has passed, the Taliban have yet again launched a coordinated attack on Kunduz and its provincial capital of Kunduz City.

Both of us served in Kunduz from 2011-12, at a time when it seemed as though the province would continue on a trajectory of increasing stability. Although the insurgency remained active during our time in the province, ISAF had created ample room to "hold" and "build." District "shadow governors" were killed, and junior Taliban commanders were defecting and reconciling with the Kunduz government, which was steadily expanding its reach into the rural countryside. Our unit's operations supported both of these phases, and we believe that they too contributed to short-term stability in the province. In light of the Taliban's resurgence in Kunduz, however, it is clear that much of this apparent success was fleeting. This analysis attempts to explain why.

Figure 1: Map of Kunduz Province

Warning Signs

Hopes were high for Kunduz in mid-2010. The deployment of a U.S. infantry battalion (1-87 IN, of the 10th Mountain Division) helped Afghan forces to contest areas that were previously controlled by the insurgency. A relentless direct action SOF campaign simultaneously threw local Taliban leadership into disarray. Meanwhile, the cooptation of key militias previously fighting on the side of the Taliban provided the government with auxiliary forces that could challenge the insurgency in rural areas, where sympathy for the Taliban was strongest.

Lacking the ability to control substantial swaths of territory, the insurgency shifted underground, focusing its operations on a two-pronged campaign involving the assassination of provincial leaders and suicide attacks against the populace-the latter conducted primarily in Kunduz City. As our unit (2-18 IN, 170th IBCT) began to penetrate deep into districts sympathetic to the Taliban in 2011-12, the insurgency responded by increasing the rate of its IED attacks, purportedly aided by experts from Northwest Pakistan who provided technical explosives expertise. Although this reduced our capacity to fully capitalize on, and consolidate, security gains, the Taliban nonetheless remained largely marginalized in Kunduz, engaging in mostly opportunistic attacks against ISAF and ANSF in lieu of large-scale confrontations.

In February 2012, however, exogenous events intervened to push momentum in Kunduz back in favor of the Taliban. Angered by the recent Koran burnings at Bagram airbase, locals in Imam Sahib launched a protest outside the gates of Combat Outpost Whitehorse (previously COP Fortitude), the size and location of which had allowed ISAF to project security over the entire Northern half of the province. The demonstration, which began peacefully enough, rapidly turned violent when protesters threw at least one hand grenade into the COP, injuring seven U.S. service members. As a result of this incident, COP Whitehorse was closed, significantly reducing ISAF's ability to control both Imam Sahib and Dashti Archi districts (located North and Northeast of Kunduz City, respectively).

With the surge complete and the ISAF drawdown well under way, the security situation in Kunduz began to deteriorate. In March, 2013, the Taliban assassinated Imam Sahib Police Chief Abdul Qayoum Ibrahimi. This was a substantial boon to the insurgency: the Uzbek Ibrahimi family had long exerted both de facto and official control over Imam Sahib. The assassination therefore had a disproportionately destabilizing effect on this important Northern district, home to key smuggling routes into Tajikistan.

In October 2013, German units transferred their Provincial Reconstruction Team (PRT) compound over to ANSF. Reflecting a pattern that now verges on the cliché, this final phase of the ISAF drawdown in Kunduz set the stage for the 2014 fighting season, during which the insurgency made substantial gains, particularly in the oft-contested districts of Chahar Dara and Dashti Archi. By September 2014, as the fighting season drew to a close, the Taliban were closing in on Kunduz City. Although the Afghan government painted a rosy picture following pre-presidential-election clearing operations conducted throughout the province, the real story was far bleaker. As one Afghan intelligence officer anonymously noted,

"The Taliban are five kilometers away from the provincial city centre and one kilometre from district centre. The operation in Chardara was just to try and save the city and the district centre from falling to the Taliban - to push them back and then try to open a base so that neither the district nor Kunduz city can be taken."

Regaining control of Chahar Dara, the officer added, was an impossibility, noting, "We would need a lot more support."

The limited efficacy of large-scale operations against insurgencies aside, one especially concerning aspect of the ANSF-led clearing efforts was the extent to which they relied on local militias to "hold" territory. The Afghan government was reportedly struggling to compensate Afghan Local Police (ALP) units, a circumstance that not only called the mid- and long-term loyalty of the militias to the Afghan government into question, but also led them to impose illegal taxes on local communities.

Meanwhile, Pakistani military operations in Waziristan in the early summer of 2014 significantly bolstered the Taliban's strength in Kunduz. By this time, all the warning signs were in place: a year before the seizure of the provincial capital apparently caught U.S. and Afghan officials by surprise, many local residents were already expressing significant alarm. In the words of one businessman, "The Taliban could take the [Kunduz] city any time they want to. They just don't want to bother with holding and managing it right now." Settling in for the winter, the emboldened insurgency set its sights on the provincial capital.

In the spring and summer of 2015, the Taliban capitalized on the territorial gains it made during the previous fighting season, consolidating control over Chahar Dara and Dashti Archi, and extending their presence in Imam Sahib, Aliabad, and Khanabad districts-the latter of which had increasingly suffered from the overbearing, government-sponsored ALP. Having effectively surrounded Kunduz City over the course of the 2015 fighting season, the Taliban finally seized the provincial capital in September 2015.

Figure 2: Timeline - Fall of Kunduz

Why Kunduz Fell

Despite ISAF's progress in the province before and during our time in Kunduz, several structural factors either remained unaddressed by Coalition Forces, or rapidly emerged in the months leading up to the seizure of Kunduz City, and thus contributed to current instability. Specifically, we attribute the fall of the provincial capital to five underlying causes. Below, we expand on each.

Kunduz was an economy of force operation within an economy of force operation. ISAF lacked the resources and commitment required for irreversible gains and both the Taliban and Afghans were watching.

As Afghanistan was an economy of force operation to the strategically more significant Iraq from 2003 until about 2009, so too was Kunduz an economy of force operation to the operationally more significant RC-East and RC-South. The distribution of ISAF forces in August 2010, at which time the Afghanistan surge was well under way, readily demonstrates this circumstance. At this critical juncture, the overall ISAF troop level in RC-North was 11,000. By contrast, total forces numbered 32,000 in RC-East, and 35,000 in RC-South.

Although the distribution of forces reflected the relative volatility of Afghanistan's South and East, low troop strength in the North prevented ISAF from consolidating hard-won security gains. We experienced this phenomenon directly: Bravo Company, 2-18 IN was responsible for stabilizing an area with a population of more than 300,000 people with a company sized unit of approximately 160 Soldiers, only half of which could actively patrol out of our combat outpost (COP) in Imam Sahib at any one time. Although the combined number of ISAF and ANSF forces was much higher, the ANSF in our area of operations (as well as throughout the province) were largely relegated to static defensive positions, fixed site security, and checkpoints designed to hold terrain, rather than to project security across a broader area. One of the few exceptions was the ANP Provincial Quick Reaction Force. However, the QRF primarily conducted targeted raids rather than population-centric patrols.


CONTINUED  >>>>>>>>>


http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/why-kunduz-fell?


(Opinions of the writer in this blog don't represent those of China Daily.)


Passing

Eggs

Flowers

Shake hands

Ray
Like 0 Share
8.03K

Report

Comment (0 comments)

facelist doodle Doodle board

You need to login to comment Login | register


dragon8

Year of the Dragon starts on 23 January 2012. People born under the Dragon are passionate, brave and self-assured. At their best they are pioneering spirits; at their worst, they epitomize the old adage: Fools rush in where angels fear to tread. Dragons are generous with their resources, a tendency that at its most negative can reflect a foolhardy attitude towards money. But Dragons in general are blessed with good fortune. They are smart, enterprising and have a wicked sense of humor. They have a natural flair for fashion and are the people to consult if you want to catch up on the latest trends. This Chinese New Year 2012 ushers in the Water Dragon. Water exerts a calming influence on the Dragon’s innate fire. Water Dragons are more open to other people’s opinions than other Dragons which gives them the ability to channel their personal charisma into real leadership qualities. The Dragon and Love Dragons are passionate. They fall in love quickly – and out of love just as quickly. Their charisma and charm is an immense draw to people of the opposite sex whose attention and admiration they crave. Though they have a tendency to treat love like a game, they can settle down when they meet the right partner, someone who’s strong enough not to be bowled over by the Dragon’s flamboyant, independent and stubborn personality. The Dragon’s ideal partners are the Rat, the Monkey, and the Rooster: The Rat is practical, observant and resourceful, able to help the Dragon when extravagant promises have backed the Dragon into a corner. The Monkey is just as popular as the Dragon, curious, intellectual and fun-loving, one of the few personalities the Dragon doesn’t mind sharing the spotlight with. The Rooster can give the Dragon a run for the money on the fashion-forward front; attractive, well-groomed, fiercely loyal and committed to honesty, the Rooster serves as the Dragon’s reality check, keeping the Dragon from making promises that he or she can’t keep. The Dragon and Wealth Dragon years are lucky for anyone thinking of starting a business or initiating a new project of any sort because money is easier to come by for everyone, whether it’s earned, borrowed or received as a gift. Consequently we can expect the economic downturn to ease up a bit in the coming year. Fortunes can be made but they can also be lost: Keep in mind like all good things, the Year of the Dragon will come to an end and you will be held accountable for unreasonable extravagances. Dragons do well in professions that give them the ability to function somewhat autonomously. They make excellent sales people, publicists, political campaigners, lawyers, real estate brokers, actors and politicians. Yes, that's me.

Album

Recent comments

Star blogger

Anming

4124

views

Maierwei

2603

views

财神

4580

views

Most Viewed

Most commented

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.