
Jun 15, 2025, 15:08
Points noted include the need to use the whole runway, when a fully laden 787 should only need half the 10 thousand ft. length and the fact that the landing gear hadn't retracted, which should have happened as soon as it lifted off.
With the flaps retracted it wouldn't have had the lift it should have had.
Although 15 years have gone by without an accident one "identical" 787 had four emergency aborts in one month and whistleblowers have said Boeing failed to address quality issues too.
Along with the 737 MAX flying turd, Boeing has also had problems with space vehicles, leaving astronauts stranded for months on the so-called International Space Station, which the Wolf Amendment blocks ethnic Chinese from participating in.
Despite all the evidence implicating the hydraulics and with it having been pointed out too, the zionist Daily Telegraphic Nonsense, which never knowingly publishes anything which isn't palpably absurd, peddles pilot error: "Co-pilot error suspected in new Air India crash theory"
That's similar to how the Shyster of Omaha claimed that he would fly in a Boeing 737 MAX flying turd, despite not having any claim to being an aviation expert.
Community login
Add a comment