Home / Forum / World affairs

A China-US accord on AI? US should unclench its fist first

Report

A very hungry caterpillar

Aug 31, 2023, 22:32

- Global Times

Following Huawei's 5G chokepoint breakthrough, Baidu, another Chinese tech giant, announced on Thursday its ChatGPT-like Ernie bot was now open to the public. China's artificial intelligence (AI) industry is currently experiencing a development boom. However, the Chinese are well aware that the US leads the way in the field. Nevertheless in US public opinion, arguments like "why China has an edge on artificial intelligence" are bubbling. 

A simple Google search using keywords like "AI," "China," and "US" would yield terms such as "AI race" and "tech war." Apparently, AI has already become a new battlefield between China and the US. As early as 2018, US media began hyping the idea of "China's Artificial Intelligence Revolution: a Sputnik Moment for the West?"

AI, a core driving force in the new wave of technological revolution and industrial transformation, has the potential to propel social productivity to new heights. Despite starting relatively late, Chinese AI development has achieved significant milestones in recent years, making it a notable contributor in both research and application in the AI field. In 2021, Stanford University's AI Index, which assesses AI advancements worldwide, ranks China among the top three countries for global AI vibrancy. One year later, McKinsey predicted that AI could add some $600 billion to China's economy by 2030.

It goes without saying that the US won't sit idle. Its reactions are so predictable, as in recent years, almost all high-tech products exported from China to developed countries have faced hindrance due to so-called security concerns. Huawei and ZTE have long been blacklisted by the US due to perceived "unacceptable risks" to US national security. DJI drones have been accused of collecting sensitive information that can be accessed by Beijing. British ministers said that Chinese electric cars imported by the UK to help hit net zero targets will enable Beijing to spy on British citizens … The excuses are getting increasingly laughable, but they all reflect an ideological factor. 

China's AI industry has confronted similar treatment. On July 13, 2021, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken hinted that China's application of AI technology application "could threaten human rights," stressing that "whenever rules and norms that affect American lives are being debated and decided, American diplomats … will be leading the charge."

In other words, Blinken was saying that the US has to maintain absolute shaping power and discourse power over the international system and ideology, refusing to accept any country that might be able to challenge the rules set by Washington - this is all about US hegemony.

The competition has raised concerns. Peter Bittner, a lecturer from University of California, Berkeley, wrote an article earlier this month, stating that the lack of standardized AI norms could see countries indulging in covert AI activities, fostering suspicion and increasing the chances of preemptive actions based on misinterpreted intentions. Moreover, the strategic and tactical advantages that AI can offer to military operations are enormous. An uncontrolled AI arms race won't merely be a bilateral issue, but a global one. Therefore, Bittner said a China-US accord on AI is imperative.

This proposal is well-intentioned and necessary. Currently, there is no truly effective framework to support global collaboration in AI governance, which is essential for the healthy development and application of the AI industry. 

However, when it comes to a bilateral AI accord between China and the US, it needs to be incorporated into a more systematic and comprehensive strategy. It cannot be separated from the big picture of China-US ties. The establishment of an AI accord requires mutual trust, and the US must demonstrate sincerity. It must not take advantage of China's restraint and goodwill to harm China's core interests, for instance, asymmetrically restricting China in the field of AI while continuously challenging China's red lines on the Taiwan question will not be allowed, Shen Yi, a professor at Fudan University, told the Global Times.

After all, the US has a track record of being fond of blabbering on "rules" and "norms" while simultaneously stirring up troubles across the world. 

China is prepared for both cooperation and struggle. Huawei's comeback in the 5G industry serves as a lesson to the US - containment won't bring China's high-tech capabilities to its knees, but will only make it stronger. China has been prepared for cutthroat competition in any field. China and the US can fully cooperate in the AI industry and utilize the technology for the benefit of their people and human development, on the simple premise that "We will extend a hand if you are willing to unclench your fist."

2 1439
Newtown

''The establishment of an AI accord requires mutual trust, and the US must demonstrate sincerity.'' Doesn't China also have to demonstrate its sincerity in this situation or is it immune from such a requirement?

gork

PARASITES!

The Mate 60 Pro is powered by a Kirin processor designed by Huawei’s chip arm HiSilicon, according to multiple teardown videos circulating online. Several online outlets reported the chip employed 5-nanometer node technology — just a generation behind the latest. Bloomberg News couldn’t determine the manufacturer or sophistication of the chip.
- Huawei’s Mystery Phone Rallies China in Fight Against US Curbs

That suggests China is keeping quiet about her capabilities so that the Great Satan can continue to pretend it's not a charity case.

Huawei separated from Honor and Honor bought krappy Qualcomm chips, despite Huawei's being more advanced.

On August 30, Huawei unexpectedly announced its plan to sell the Mate60 Pro, which is marketed as a 4G phone but can run on 5G. Chinese media suggested Huawei avoided the term “5G” to prevent facing more US curbs.
- Huawei’s new phone juices Chinese chip stocks

More likely is that China has an agreement not to point out that the Great Satan is a charity case just like the "English Patient".

The Great Satan ostensibly banned Nvidia's krappy 12nm A100. But Huawei's 7nm Ascend 910 already dominates China's domestic market and has TWICE the processing power.

The attack on Huawei came as she became the top sell of smartphones worldwide. The Apple iPhone is designed in Japan, uses Samsung technology (sometimes without Samsung having to sue for patent violation) and is manufactured in China before being sold AT COST to Apple who apply a HUGE mark-up, which is counted as part of Great Satan GDP!!!!

Similarly, the "English Patient" now has India's Tata and Japan's Nissan as the EV car manufacturing hopes of the poodle-state, with China's Envision supplying batteries for both. PERENNIAL CHARITY CASE!

With de-dollarisation now unstoppable, war criminal, Henry "useless eaters" Kissinger and the "one-eyed scottish git" (as the fromer Yob Gear moron called him) have called for a one-World government. In other words without parasiting several trillions off humanity just by devaluing the jew-confetti each year, they want a global sytem of welfare. But these useless, genocidal parasites want to live high on the hog, like King Charlie, the World's greediest welfare claimant, who's freak-show family haven't done an honest day's work at any time during the last milllenia.