Home / Forum / Free talk and fun

How young adults can start saving and investing

Report

A very hungry caterpillar

Dec 05, 2021, 09:39


My wife and I have several grandchildren who are in college or have recently graduated. We would like to share a good resource with them about starting and building a nest egg. Any recommendations?

Two points: First, I have been saving this question for the holidays, hoping it might provide a gift idea or two. Second, you and your wife can now go directly to the head of the Best Grandparents line.

The advice seemingly is as old as retirement itself: It’s almost never too early to begin saving and investing for later life. That said, many people find it difficult to start. A study in 2019 by Morning Consult for the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards found that, among people saving for retirement, about half (49%) started when they were in their 30s or older.

Interestingly, in the same survey, almost half of respondents (49%) said people should begin saving for retirement between ages 20 and 29. One in five adults (21%) said people should begin saving in their teens.

Of course, people who make the effort to start early give themselves an enormous advantage in the retirement sweepstakes, given the magic of compound interest. The Securities and Exchange Commission has a nice calculator where you—and your grandchildren—can run the numbers.

I recommend giving each of your grandchildren a copy of “If You Can,” by William Bernstein, an investment adviser and author. This 48-page booklet is written expressly for young people and provides a simple, all but foolproof recipe for building a secure nest egg. The opening paragraph should grab your grandchildren’s attention:

“Would you believe me if I told you that there’s an investment strategy that a seven-year-old could understand, will take you 15 minutes of work per year, outperform 90% of finance professionals in the long run, and make you a millionaire over time?” (If you’re wondering, the strategy involves investing—early and conscientiously—in stock and bond index funds.)


The title comes from the discipline needed for any investor to be successful: the willingness to start a savings plan and stick with it. As Mr. Bernstein notes: “Dieting and investing are both simple, but neither is easy.”

Yes, you can purchase the booklet online for several dollars. Or, you can download it—at no charge—from Mr. Bernstein’s site, efficientfrontier.com.

And…if you have the resources, perhaps you can help your grandchildren get their savings plans off the ground. No, you aren’t likely to see the results of your generosity. But you will have paved the way for several successful retirements. And that’s a heck of a gift.

My brother took out a reverse mortgage several years ago, and his home today is worth more than when he got the mortgage. I have three questions: Is it possible for my brother to get out of this reverse mortgage? If so, how would he do this? And how does the fact that his home has increased in value figure into this?

Yes, your brother is able to get out of his reverse mortgage. And the process is relatively straightforward.

In this case, the reverse mortgage, essentially, is just like having a traditional, or “forward,” mortgage, says Stephanie Moulton, a professor at Ohio State University who specializes in housing and consumer-finance policy. Typically, a reverse mortgage is repaid when the borrower dies, or when the borrower’s surviving spouse dies. If your brother wishes to sell his home now—before the end of the loan’s term—he simply would need to pay off the existing balance on the reverse mortgage.

Your brother can check with his lender to get the current balance. That figure is based on how much money has been advanced to your brother (remember: with a reverse mortgage the lender is making periodic payments to the homeowner) plus interest. If your brother’s home has appreciated in value since he first secured the reverse mortgage, there’s a good chance he may owe less than the house is worth, Dr. Moulton says. Which means if he sells the home and pays off the balance, he can keep the difference.

And that raises an interesting possibility. Let’s say your brother wants to stay in his home—and wants to tap additional equity because his house has appreciated in value. If that’s the case, he could refinance the existing reverse mortgage into a new reverse mortgage, Dr. Moulton says. In fact, about half of new “home equity conversion mortgages” today—which are reverse mortgages insured by the federal government—are refinances, she adds.

That said, your brother would want to make sure that the house has appreciated enough to make this worth it. That’s because the refinancing will involve a new round of closing costs.

3 1030
Newtown
markwu post time: 2021-12-06 07:30

''Money and wealth are personal levers but their real value is realized when they become levers to common prosperity.'' ''It is glorious tyo be rich'' in Communist China.

GhostBuster

Save for rainy days!

markwu

In addition to learning how to code which is by the way also useful to troubleshoot recurring web issues such as found with this forum site, youngsters should also learn early how to do sensible personal financial planning since money is a universal lever of means towards ends that persists from young to old.

This is especially important for China whose one-child policy has often meant parents doting on their single child until latter has too high expectations that things will continue to come easier later in life, however often not the case. They become acquisitive without appreciating values, and clueless about the real work world where gains are more likely only incremental rewards for hard unremitting labor and personal sacrifice. They are more prone to losing their balance about things.

Take those rich kids in racing car clubs. They splurge on fast cars that are more showy than practical and can be dangerous because driver skills can never equal machine requirements. Besides, they can't race on city roads so they race for a few hours on tracks which means those machines will also be underutilized for the fossil fuel and tyres burned and pollutive noise generated.

Like their machines, they will going round and round to nowhere in their life except for the transient thrill and colorful crowd.  Won't it be better to spend the money buying furniture and books for hamlet schools in remote places to uplift the faceless poor so that they can contribute more to society later in their lives?

But, oh you will say, they are already doing that with an equivalent amount on charity. Then, do it double for charity and zero for excessive and inane conspicuous consumption that drains one's core ultimately.

Money and wealth are personal levers but their real value is realized when they become levers to common prosperity.

Right or wrong?


ren