- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 1223 Hour
- Reading permission
This post was edited by abramicus at 2013-11-4 02:32|
BRITISH PROPAGANDISTS MISGUIDING GULLIBLE UIGHURS AGAINST THEIR MOTHERLAND SHOULD BE MADE ACCOUNTABLE FOR ALL THE ACTS OF TERRORISM CAUSED BY THEIR PROPAGANDA
Seneca, my aim is not to convince you, one of the British propagandists inciting unstable individuals amongst the Uighurs to irresponsible acts against their fellow Chinese, by harping on their imaginary and fabircated discrimination by the Chinese legal system. Only the terrorists and their supporters are subject to any governmental action, and these, when caught are held up as examples of what? Of how terrorists should be treated? No, of how ordinary Uighurs are supposedly to have been treated, smearing the Uighurs wth terrorism as a whole, in the hope that they will all be treated like the terrorists, furthering the British scheme to foment ethnic violence in a place where the Uighurs are enjoying their preferred status as ethinic minorities, having the right to have more children than the Han majority, and having special admissions preferences to the best universities of the nation, a degree of affirmative action that would make all other countries blush. Instead, you hold up your own brainwashed fanatics, using a special fundamentalist variation of their religion as the key to their minds, in turning an act against their fellow men into a morally justifiable act of courage. These 3 Ughurs who were brainwashed by YOUR British-based progaganda are also your VICTIMS, because they otherwise would have enjoyed happy, productive lives in their hometown in Xinjiang.
The Briitsh empire must be held responsible for the deaths of 5 people, therefore, and not just the 2 victims of their misguided and totally deluded misgivings.
If the Uighurs in Xinjiang should have any misgivings, it should be about the British interference in their domestic affairs, inciting and supporting members amongst them to disrupt civil society, destroy private and public property, and take innocent lives in the wrong belief that what they are doing is right and justified.
The Western press is loath to report that when Wuer Kaisi, a leading TAM dissident, was being enticed to incite revolt and secession of the Uighurs, of which ethnic group he belongs to, reportedly answered, "Why? Xinjiang has always been a part of China."
Indeed, this dissident, rejected the British propaganda that is baseless, fabricated, and aimed to benefit the Briitish empire's plan to come back and cut up China like a watermelon, laying the groundwork in ethnic strife. No wonder, he has been totally marginalized in the disuccusions about freedom and ethnic rights in China by the Western media. He is happily married to a lady from Taiwan, as a proud citizen of China, still. Does not that say everything about the fact that Britain is not yet done with China, and Chna should hold Britian accountable for the current international mayhem from all sides, seemingly inexpleicable, except when analyzed through the prism of history and current events?