Views: 1667|Replies: 7

(ESA) has declared Phobos, the mysterious Martian moon, to be artificial. [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-6-6 04:52:15 |Display all floors
The prestigious European Space Agency (ESA) has declared Phobos, the mysterious Martian moon, to be artificial. At least one-third of it is hollow and its origin is not natural, but alien in nature. The ESA is Europe's counterpart to NASA. Could this revelation motivate NASA to release the secrets it is harbouring? Don't count on it… because if its artificial an alien civilization must have put it there.


Phobos was first believed to be artificial by famous astrophysicist Dr. Iosif Samuilovich Shklovsky when he calculated the orbital motion of the Martian satellite Phobos. He came to the inescapable conclusion that the Martian moon is artificial and hollow - basically a titanic spaceship.


Russian astronomer, Dr. Cherman Struve, spent months calculating the two Martian moons' orbits with extreme accuracy during the early 20th Century. Studying the astronomer's notes, Shklovsky realized as the years progressed into decades, that Phobos's orbital velocity and position no longer matched Struve's mathematically predicted position.

After lengthy study of the tidal, gravitic, and magnetic forces, Shklovsky came to the firm conclusion that, “ No natural causes could account for the origins of the two odd moons or their bizarre behavior, particularly that exhibited by Phobos. The moons were artificial. Someone or something built them.

During an interview about the mysterious Martian moon Shklovsky explained: "There's only one way in which the requirements of coherence, constancy of shape of Phobos, and its extremely small average density can be reconciled. We must assume that Phobos is a hollow, empty body, resembling an empty tin can."

For decades most of mainstream science ignored Shklovsky's breakthrough work, until the ESA began to take a closer look at the odd little moon.

ESA study declares Phobos not natural.
The ESA study abstract that appeared in the peer-reviewed Geophysical Research Letters reveals that Phobos is not what many astrophysicists and astronomers believed for generations: a captured asteroid.

"We report independent results from two subgroups of the Mars Express Radio Science (MaRS) team who independently analyzed Mars Express (MEX) radio tracking data for the purpose of determining consistently the gravitational attraction of the moon Phobos on the MEX spacecraft, and hence the mass of Phobos. New values for the gravitational parameter (GM=0.7127 ± 0.0021 x 10-³ km³/s²) and density of Phobos (1876 ± 20 kg/m³) provide meaningful new constraints on the corresponding range of the body's porosity (30% ± 5%), provide a basis for improved interpretation of the internal structure. We conclude that the interior of Phobos likely contains large voids. When applied to various hypotheses bearing on the origin of Phobos, these results are inconsistent with the proposition that Phobos is a captured asteroid."

Casey Kazan writes in ESA: Mars Moon Phobos 'Artificial,' that "…the official ESA Phobos website contained explicit scientific data, from multiple perspectives, which strongly 'supported the idea that this is what radar echoes would look like, coming back from inside 'a huge…geometric… hollow spaceship'. In fact, they were the primary source of the decidedly 'internal, 3-D geometric-looking' radar signature. The concurrence of all three of these independent Mars Express experiments- imaging, internal mass distribution, (tracking) and internal radar imaging, now agreed that the interior of Phobos is partially hollow with internal, geometric 'voids' inside it. Meaning that Phobos is artificial."

In other words, Phobos is not a natural satellite, is not a "captured asteroid," and is hollow. This is exactly what Dr. Shklovsky found back in the 1960s. Phobos was artificially constructed and placed into Martian orbit by...who?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2013-6-6 13:50:13 |Display all floors
Porous yes but artificial debunked in the 1970's. {:soso_e148:}

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-6-6 14:36:44 |Display all floors
This post was edited by Chechen at 2013-6-7 07:51
brobostigon Post time: 2013-6-6 13:50
Porous yes but artificial debunked in the 1970's.

Tr0ll knows better than the European Space Agency, at least he has convinceed himself

Sorry for ESA, they let the honeydipper bozo Casey Kazan link his name to their agency.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2013-6-6 15:24:43 |Display all floors
This post was edited by brobostigon at 2013-6-6 15:25

Not hardly the first time obscure data has been used to create a woo-woo story.  Going from 30% density to "titanic spaceship?"  Yeah right.  You won't find Starship Titanic on ESA or any other reputable wesite; only the alien UFO and sensationalist websites.  

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-6-6 15:37:21 |Display all floors
brobostigon Post time: 2013-6-6 15:24
Not hardly the first time obscure data has been used to create a woo-woo story.  Going from 30% dens ...

And look where i find you wasting your life away doing nothing.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-6-6 21:07:22 |Display all floors
No they haven't you phucking idiot.

It is of interest, as the average density is 1.7 g/cm3, but they have explanations for this being an accretion of orbital debris.

The "hollow spaceship" idea was from some Russian dude, not the ESA.


How come you're such a dope, Chechen ?
"他不是救星, 他是一个非常淘气男孩" - Monty Python

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-6-7 06:31:02 |Display all floors
This post was edited by Chechen at 2013-6-7 07:25
emucentral Post time: 2013-6-6 21:07
How come you're such a dope, Chechen ?

Why am I a dope, I didn't write the article you lemurian fakir.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.