Author: firstcause

9/11 -- Did it happen the way the Anglos said it did? (PART 2)   [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-6-9 11:43:04 |Display all floors
emucentral Post time: 2012-6-8 20:53
You really are a dickhead.
The reconstructions of aircraft crashes are to determine what caused th ...

No Planes

You and I know there were no planes,Birdbrain.If you have evidence of the fictitious planes,please bring it to my notice.
9/11 was an inside job.
No second plane.It was a bomb.Bomb in the other building.
You KNOW without a doubt the videos are fake,right ?!
Planes don't meld into steel and concrete buildings.They crash into them !!!!!!!
It's amazing how the building ate the plane !!!
Imagine those fragile wings cutting slots in massive steel columns !!!!!
How STUPID can they think the people are to believe that crap ??!!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-6-9 11:47:01 |Display all floors
emucentral Post time: 2012-6-8 20:51
You're picking the one shot framed to exclude much of the wreckage.
Why don't you show the other p ...

Landing Gear

The pictures that showed the landing gear did not have them in position at the site of the alleged crash.The photographs shown by "debunkers" could have been taken anywhere.The tiny piece of fuselage on the lawn was undoubtedly planted.We should have had about 50 tonnes of tail,wings and other portions of the fuselage on the lawn.
9/11 was an inside job.
No second plane.It was a bomb.Bomb in the other building.
You KNOW without a doubt the videos are fake,right ?!
Planes don't meld into steel and concrete buildings.They crash into them !!!!!!!
It's amazing how the building ate the plane !!!
Imagine those fragile wings cutting slots in massive steel columns !!!!!
How STUPID can they think the people are to believe that crap ??!!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-6-9 11:50:32 |Display all floors
emucentral Post time: 2012-6-8 20:34
Where is the engine, well Petera swore that this engine was a CFM56 which is used in a 737 and the ...

Lies

If I have shown to have lied,provide the instance.The engine has shown by the TOBI duct configuration to have been a JT9D 7/7J type used only on 747's and not on 767's.The engine is in any case not available for bipartisan examination,which is proof in itself that it was planted.
9/11 was an inside job.
No second plane.It was a bomb.Bomb in the other building.
You KNOW without a doubt the videos are fake,right ?!
Planes don't meld into steel and concrete buildings.They crash into them !!!!!!!
It's amazing how the building ate the plane !!!
Imagine those fragile wings cutting slots in massive steel columns !!!!!
How STUPID can they think the people are to believe that crap ??!!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-6-9 12:02:47 |Display all floors
emucentral Post time: 2012-6-8 20:49
Funny about how the ignorant tossers denounce the idea that the WTC fire weakened the steel stru ...

"Weakened"?

So a fire burning on less than a dozen floors of a 47 floor building at a temp. significantly lower than the melting point of steel caused it to collapse symmetrically, onto its own footprint in a little over 7 seconds?

Is that your "explanation", birdbrain?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-6-9 12:18:04 |Display all floors
This post was edited by baofeng at 2012-6-9 12:24
emucentral Post time: 2012-6-8 20:49
Funny about how the ignorant tossers denounce the idea that the WTC fire weakened the steel stru ...

More from emu's post:

This report a day ago from Melbourne.
"Man charged over Flemington hotel fire June 7, 2012 06:39AM View as multiple pages
A MAN has been arrested after Melbourne's Flemington Racecourse Hotel, a known haunt for squatters, was destroyed by fire.
Fire broke out at the disused two-storey hotel, across the road from the Flemington Racecourse, just after 9pm (AEST) yesterday and took 50 firefighters about two hours to put out.

Emergency crews couldn't enter the building's smouldering shell because of a partial roof collapse, and at one stage the radiant heat of the fire melted nearby overhead tram lines."

And here is emu's analysis of the above mentioned event:

"So a fire, in a brick hotel, no tonnes of jet fuel, just furniture and internal structures, caused tram electrical cabling several metres away from the building to melt.
If it was copper wire, then the melting point is over 1000 degrees celcuis.
If it were steel then the melting point is even higher."
Absolutely brilliant for a John Cleese skit, Birdbrain... but you forgot to mention how a fire in a squatters' haunt can generate such a high temp. Did the squatters use an oxy-acetylene blow torch? Perhaps they had a mini blast furnace?{:soso_e113:}

BTW, what is "celcuis"? {:soso_e122:}

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-6-9 12:46:31 |Display all floors
This post was edited by emucentral at 2012-6-9 14:47
petera Post time: 2012-6-9 13:41
Photographs ?

Do you have photographs of molten copper on the rails and on the ground,Birdbrain ? Or at least blobs of solidified copper that was molten ? What was the diameter of the wires ? Idiot reporters don't necessarily report events accurately.In any case the columns of the WTC were steel that melts at 1500 deg C and were thickly encrusted with asbestos based insulation.No tall steel framed building has ever been brought down by fire.




Stunning work by Peturda.

So "idiot reporters don't necessarily report events accurately", in relation to the melted tram lines.
However those who reported molten metal at the WTC are, of course, far more accurate in their observations.

So basically, reporters who report in line with Petera's preconceived notions are to be believed, and those who report facts at odds with his conspiracy theory are to be dismissed as paid NWO operatives or dickheads.
Petera, you've just blown a hole in your own argument, you fool.

As for the "steel framed building" thing, we know this is a deliberate lie by Petera.
We've already seen evidence that the steel structure of the Madrid building which collapsed was limited to the steel sections which were not encased in concrete.
We know about the old steel building used to house blueprints, which collapsed from a fire fuelled by paper.
I have seen haysheds, (lightweight steel construction, none of the stresses and loads of the WTC), warped and collapsed from what is basically a grass fire (hay is dried out grass).

You say the WTC framing was encased in Asbestos insulation.

We have seen evidence that the insulation was sprayed on inconsistently in some places, leaving exposed metal.

We know that the plane collision would have stripped some of the insulation off the steel framing.

And of course, the question needs to be asked, why was there insulation on the steel, if an office fire was not of any danger to the structure ?

Petera has dug himself into a hole, yet again.
Does he really think we're all as stupid as he is ?
"他不是救星, 他是一个非常淘气男孩" - Monty Python

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-6-9 12:47:50 |Display all floors
This post was edited by emucentral at 2012-6-9 14:48
baofeng Post time: 2012-6-9 14:18
BTW, what is "celcuis"?
So that's the best you can come up with ?

"他不是救星, 他是一个非常淘气男孩" - Monty Python

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.