Views: 6773|Replies: 20

Chinese, Why Aren't You Angry?   [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-4-23 12:27:46 |Display all floors

      Summary:There has only been an opening-up of the economy - not of society or politics, the regulators are failing at their tasks and the legal authorities lack backbone, now is the time for us to start rethinking how we plan to reform and open-up.      



Economic Observer Online
April, 20, 2012
By Xu Zhiyong (许志永), a public interest lawyer and activist
Translated by Song Chunling
Original article:
[Chinese]

With the Melamine Milk Scandal of 2008 still lingering in people's minds, the news of the widespread use of "poisonous capsules" that was exposed by the mainland media last week has once again shocked the public.

As soon as news of the poison pills began to emerge, local governments made a big show to the media of how much they were doing to deal with the scandal - the State Food and Drug Administration, the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce and other government departments were all clamoring to react swiftly and decisively.

However, despite this noise and fury, a drug manufacturer in one of the regions where these poison capsules were produced - the county of Fucheng (阜城县) in the central province of Hebei - had already been exposed for similar crimes by the media eight years ago.

At the time, the company was strictly regulated by local authorities for a three-month period but here we are eight years later and industrial gelatin is still being used in the manufacture of medical capsules.

How could this happen?

In a democratic society that operates according to the rule of law, citizens have many ways of protecting themselves from harm - these include both litigation and regulation by the state.

For example in the U.S.,  if an elderly person is burned by the hot coffee served in a McDonald's restaurant, he or she could turn to the media, lawyers and perhaps even an NGO to help sue the restaurant and get hundreds of thousands of dollars in compensation.

Another example is the role played by regulatory authorities. The Food and Drug Administration in the US acts like the "food police," and employs 9,000 people across the country. If it's found not to have enforced the regulations properly, the regulator can also be sued and may have to pay compensation.

However in China, food scandals exposed by the media can be "harmonized," the rights of lawyers and NGOs are limited and as the courts are too weak, when cases are considered in the least-way public, they become "sensitive."

Given the importance of food and drug safety, it’s obviously not enough to simply depend on market competition, the media, public interest lawyers and litigation to make sure that companies act in accordance with regulations.

Real-time supervision by the State Food and Drug Administration, the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce and other relevant departments is also needed.

Compared with the American institutions, the comparative administrations in China are bigger and employ more staff. So why do serious food and drug safety incidents happen time and time again?

What are these regulators up to?

It seems only when a scandal is suddenly exposed by the media and when higher levels of government begin to take an interest, that these institutions become nervous and act fast, often unreasonably and with disregard for legal procedures.

When things die down, however, everyone who was caught up in the scandal attempts to make use of their personal relationships with people in power.

Those officials who were removed from their positions find work in another area, those who were sent to jail are released on bail for medical treatment, the factories that were shut down are reopened - whereever there are personal relationships (guanxi), there is also the chance of a new lease on life.

Chinese laws are strict and the Chinese government can be harsh - however when personal connections are so important and all enterprises know how important it is to have someone looking out for them, is it still possible to expect the regulators to fulfill their duties when they have such a complicated relationship with the industries they are expected to regulate?

To quote the title of an essay by the well-know Taiwanese author Lung Ying-tai (龙应台), or Long Yingtai in pinyin, from a collection titled The Wild Fire published in the 1980s, "Chinese People, Why Aren't You Angry?" (中国人,你为什么不生气?)

Although we know most of the time it's no use getting angry, this is simply the way things are in China.

There are many things that we can do to improve food and drug safety, for example making the payment of punitive damages part of our legal system; constantly reforming and adjusting the roles of the regulators and even engaging in large scale attempts to improve morals - but we soon learn that these only treat the symptoms and cannot cure the disease.

There has only been an opening-up of the economy - not of society or politics, the regulators are failing at their tasks and the legal authorities lack backbone, now is the time for us to start rethinking how we plan to reform and open-up.

This commentary was edited by Paul Pennay (EO)


Good Gweilo: My job is the ideological quality control

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-4-24 00:21:57 |Display all floors
Maybe those Chinese should listen from some laowais, why they love to stay in China and refuse to leave.

With all those problematic food, pollution etc etc. They still begging for Visa!

How could this happen?! Are they out of their mind?

We need the OP to explain this phenomenon. Why he's still here and refuse to leave?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-4-24 00:39:45 |Display all floors
http://www.economist.com/node/17581844

Earlier this month Food Banks Canada, an association of charities, reported that 900,000 Canadians rely on food handouts, up by 9% on last year. Many are among the country’s 300,000 or so homeless people.


See? 900,000 Canadians need to beg for food back in Canada. This should be the reason why some cleverer losers flock into China and enjoy cheap porridge here.

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2012-4-24 01:00:44 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2012-4-24 01:06:42 |Display all floors
This post was edited by FreddyAguilar at 2012-4-24 01:06
liuyedao Post time: 2012-4-24 00:21
Maybe those Chinese should listen from some laowais, why they love to stay in China and refuse to le ...

There are also a lot of Chinese in the Philippines doing business.

Are they out of their mind ?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2012-4-24 01:53:00 |Display all floors
How angry were Americans when they saw the film Erin Brockovich? Was this also Chinese Guangxi? How angry are people in the western world about the deliberate poisoning of Vietnamese by the US using Agent Orange and its continuous effects even as we discuss, and in fact how angry are Americans against Monsanto who produced that poison? Well I did chat with an American recently about just that, and he was 'steaming mad', but not the general public in America. If it does not make it into an easily available mainstream media, then it does not exist. Although I have digressed somewhat from your intention here, in that you seem wish to wish to show that the Chinese government are sponsors of  poisoning their populace. I would like to make the point that money is the ruler when it comes to this type of activity. Human greed and corruption which is shared by all nations and not just China.


Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2015 Most Popular Member Medal

Post time 2012-4-24 12:34:58 |Display all floors
""Chinese, Why Aren't You Angry?""
Because they are happy reading this outlandish and exaggerated sensationalism written by propagandist such as yourself
and when they get tired of that they read some real news.
Food poisoning happens all over the world. If occasional food poisoning was enough to start a revolt there would be
anarchy over the entire world. No government could exist anywhere. But keep it up buffoon, you are entertaining at least. {:soso_e113:}
If capitalism promotes innovation and creativity then why aren't scientists and artists the richest people in a capitalist nation?

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.