Author: ttt222

Stand with the CPC forever on Bo's case   [Copy link] 中文

Post time 2012-4-17 02:43:53 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-4-17 02:45:26 |Display all floors
This post was edited by Bandito at 2012-4-17 03:06
robert237 Post time: 2012-4-17 02:16
""If I had business in Afghanistan I would. If you are aslo lucky to have business to be conducted ...

You do me a disservice, Sir. I care about the folks in China hence the one two on this site. If I was just interested in feathering my nest, why would I care if folks have no access to net? As the saying goes, I won't have a dog in that particular fight!

Cash facilitates stuff so it is fraudulent to suggest otherwise. Now, if one is endangering life in Kabul, then I gotta have a 'taste' so being paid danger money is par for the course.

I love the way you wield propagandist.brings a smile to my face. What do you think you are doing up here? You are spreading your own view of the World and it makes you propagandist in chief.

You can care about human rights and cash........and that does not make one an odious person. Try dating a Chinese IT girl , especially in HK, without pocketful of cash
I noticed that you have allowed yourself to not address the key plank of my message but sidetracked self with cash red herring:) I said, most Afghans are able togo about conduct on net as unfettered access unlike in China:)
No, I live above Sunset Plaza, it's a little house I rent and it's a little rundown but has a beautiful view, what about you?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-4-17 02:58:03 |Display all floors
seneca Post time: 2012-4-16 17:19
As will be recalled by some, Gong Gangmu turned witness against his own lawyer, Mr Li, and caused hi ...

The problem is simply this........there is law in China. Every man and woman are not above the law. But the 9 man politburo are above it and are law unto selves so their actions are beyond scrutiny. They can wield their extra judicial power safe in the knowledge that no one can challenge them....This was Mr Bo's folly in Dalian and Chongqing
No, I live above Sunset Plaza, it's a little house I rent and it's a little rundown but has a beautiful view, what about you?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2012-4-17 16:30:16 |Display all floors
saltandpepper Post time: 2012-4-17 00:26
The only mass murderer that committed genocides around the world in epic proportion for centuries  ...

Make steel and starve. 1959-1963 - 30 million dead of starvation. Mousey Tongue refused food aid from the West to save face. That's murder buddy, whichever way you look at it.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2012-4-17 23:34:29 |Display all floors
seneca Post time: 2012-4-17 15:42
Every household was ordered to purchase the other "classics" to boot, and Mao made a huge windfall ...

I would call that a 'tall tale' and without any further evidence than your say, so pointless to even state it. If you have something to back that up all good and well, but other than that I would say this is nothing but exaggeration on your part.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2012-4-17 23:56:29 |Display all floors
Who owns Mao's millions?
By Michael Bristow
BBC News, Beijing

The Chinese national flag is raised in front of a portrait of Chairman Mao in Tiananmen Square, Beijing (file photo)
Mao Zedong is still highly respected by many Chinese people
China's former communist leader and revolutionary hero Mao Zedong amassed a fortune from book royalties.

Mao persecuted thousands of writers, along with other artists and intellectuals, for their Western, capitalist ideas.

But at the same time he had a steady income from his own writing - a sum now believed to be more than 130 million yuan ($17.6m, £8.8m).

A recently-published article in a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) magazine has reignited a debate about who should inherit this fortune.

Millions of books containing Mao's essays, poems and thoughts have been published around the world.

Perhaps the best known publication is Quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong, also known as the Little Red Book.

As the title suggests, the book is a collection of comments from Mao, on subjects such as class struggle and serving the people.

Nearly one billion copies were printed in the Cultural Revolution, a chaotic period in which Mao sought to transform Chinese society.

Schoolchildren, workers and soldiers were all required to study the book, whose wisdom was thought to be useful in almost any situation.

Family refused

Mao's Little Red Book for sale in Beijing
The Little Red book remains a popular purchase in China

The Little Red Book and other publications continue to produce royalties for Mao's estate more than 30 years after his death.

An article published in the magazine Literary World of Party History laid out just how much Mao has earned from his writing.

It said that in 1967 he was worth 5.7 million yuan ($780,000, £400,000) from books printed in Chinese, English, Russian, French, Spanish and Japanese.

But that figure, including interest, had risen to 130 million yuan ($17.6m, £8.8m) by 2001. The article did not say how much the estate is worth now.

There has long been a debate within the higher echelons of the party about who should inherit this vast sum of money.

Jiang Qing, Mao's fourth wife and loyal supporter during the Cultural Revolution, apparently asked for the money on five occasions before her death in 1991.

The CCP made it possible for Mao to earn royalties in enormous quantities
Prof Roderick MacFarquhar

Jiang, also known as Madam Mao, even brought the subject up with China's former leader before he died in 1976.

If he was in a good mood, Mao promised he would leave her some money, according to the article.

If he was in a bad mood, Mao would accuse her of wanting him to die early so she could get her hands on his cash.

Two of Mao's children also asked for the money to be given to them. Their request, along with Madam Mao's, was refused.

'Collective wisdom'

A woman holding a 100 yuan bank note
Many see no contradiction in Mao's accumulation of wealth

This issue came up again in 2003 following the publication of a new edition of Mao's collected works, according to the new article.

It arose because party leaders were apparently unsure whether or not Mao's royalties should be taxed and so asked the country's cabinet for advice.

It decided to uphold an earlier decision not to give the money to Mao's relatives because his writings were not his own, but the "crystallisation of the party's collective wisdom".

Over the last few weeks there has been debate in China's media about the legality, as well as the morality, of this viewpoint.

Should Mao's estate be considered a private or a public fortune?

Harvard University Prof Roderick MacFarquhar, who has written extensively about Mao, makes another point - the chairman's conflict of interest.

Mao was a genuine leader, not like those in charge today
Liu Tieying

"The real issue is that the CCP made it possible for Mao to earn royalties in enormous quantities by projecting his cult and prescribing his works," he told the BBC.

"Since Mao was chairman of the party, it could be suggested that there was a conflict of interest."

But many Chinese people see no inherent contradiction in a radical, left-wing revolutionary earning millions of dollars in book royalties.

They point out that Mao supposedly gave away much of this money to loyal friends, those who worked with him and the poor.

Liu Tieying, a 55-year-old former journalist, speaks for many of his generation when he says Mao did not become a leader to make money.

"Mao was a genuine leader, not like those in charge today," he said.

"He sent his own son to die in the Korean War. He gave up everything for the revolution."
Good Gweilo: My job is the ideological quality control

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2012-4-18 04:33:30 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email:
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.