Author: 468259058

Vietnam continue to occupy Chinese islands in South China sea, How to solve? [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Gold Medal September's Best Writer 2012

Post time 2011-6-1 17:19:21 |Display all floors
Originally posted by exportedkiwi at 2011-6-1 17:02
The mere fact that the South China Sea has the word, or name; "China" in it does not, in any way, denote that China exclusively owns it and all of the territories within. Should we also a ...
.

not because the name. but from the results of World war 2.

Of course all of the water in South China sea, but major islands centered in South China sea.

China (ROC) began to station naval forces after the victory of Japanese invasion.

If China hadn't slipped into civil war after that, there wouldn't have such conflicts in South China sea.

Even China slipped into civil war, but if China hadn't had the serious conflicts with the former Soviet Union, Vietnam dare not to invade these islands.

Even China had the serious conflicts with the former Soviet Union, even Vietnam invaded these islands, if China and U.S were statically allies, today Vietnam dare not to invade aggressively again.
our life is full of sunshine

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Gold Medal September's Best Writer 2012

Post time 2011-6-1 17:31:39 |Display all floors
The conflicts between China and the former Soviet Union..
It contributed the form of strategic ally of U.S and China.
It had hurt China heavily during Mao's ear.  
(Before the form of ally of the former soviet Union and China, Mao's China drove U.S away, though some of U.S politicians want to keep a contact with Mao's government)

It partly contributed to the collapse of the former soviet Union.

In future, China need not to raise conflicts with U.S, with Russia, with major European countries, ...with the most powerful countries.
our life is full of sunshine

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Gold Medal September's Best Writer 2012

Post time 2011-6-1 18:01:39 |Display all floors

In regional war

Why did U.S defeat Iraq, fail in North Korea and Vietnam war?

China and the former Soviet Union were behind these 2 countries that time.

North Korea and Vietnam were not 2 single countries.

None of powerful countries were behind Iraq in 1990s.
++++++++++++
The former soviet Union was hehind of Vietnam during the war between Vietnam and China in the early 1980s.
The U.S held a major netural status and partly ally of China.

[ Last edited by 468259058 at 2011-6-1 06:04 PM ]
our life is full of sunshine

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2011-6-1 18:55:10 |Display all floors

how to solve?

Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Gold Medal September's Best Writer 2012

Post time 2011-6-1 18:55:51 |Display all floors
Originally posted by Kbay at 2011-6-1 18:02
.Playing one power against another is never a good long term political or military strategy!
However it may be a necessary ball play in the short-term framework of politicking.
.

For small countries, they have to.

If serious conflicts took place among powerful countries, probably many small countries would have to choose the sides.

For example, In World War 2, some small countries chose German, Italy, and Japan cliques, some others chose U.S, U.K, the former Soviet Union, and China cliques.  Few of countries could have the netural status like Switzeland.

So, after the war, this 4 countries plus France composed the 5 permanent seats of U.N. security council.  The present global social order (including many major rules of values and justice) and many territories were significantly decided by U.S, Soviet Union, and U.K in a series of conferences.

The social order and many territories in Asia, especially in East and South Asia, just after World war were decided by the 3 gigantic powerful countrie plus China. The former Soviet Union presided over Japanese surrender in Korea, north of 38. U.S presided over Japanese surrender in Japan and in Korea south of 38. China(ROC) actually strongly supported the unification of Korea. (The south Korean government were in China before 1945.) China presided over Japanese surrender in Vietnam. U.K presided over Japanese surrender in its former colony.

But short later China slipped into civil war, both politicians in KMT and in CPC focused their political fights inside China. The only 1 sub-organization of U.N. moved from China to Thailand too after politicans in KMT failed and retreated to taiwan. The seat of China was held by politicians in taiwan before 1972. The seat of China was held by politicians in Mainland China from 1972 to the present. China actually lost the special privilege of the victory of Word War 2 and had to make many compromises during this civil war.

For example in Cold war, some small countries had to choose the sides again.
our life is full of sunshine

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2011-6-1 18:56:37 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Gold Medal September's Best Writer 2012

Post time 2011-6-1 18:57:34 |Display all floors
Originally posted by chico1337 at 2011-6-1 18:55
maybe by communist 'gouvernment' stop making ridiculous claims?
.
ridiculous claims???????

Please read the consitution followed by the government in Beijing and the constitution followed by the government in Taipei.
our life is full of sunshine

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.