- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 4899 Hour
- Reading permission
QUOTE: "I don't recall being abused by Satsu (and to me he appears on the left of things) and I don't believe................"|
Yes, I don't believe that I discussed Satsu as an item, but rather discussed more generally here.
I concur that Satsu has a point of view and will argue it with diligence.
QUOTE: "If you look at many debates, as soon as a comment is made about the delay..............."
This is an axiom, and it is interesting and funny to see the discussions between Yourself and Liuyedao disintegrate into two old fish wives arguing.
That is not to say that engaging socially for mutual amusement and oral abuse therapy does not have its merits.
There are some who come to this board who I think actually do so, just for the abuse.
However, I think the real point is, that it is foolish to allow a discussion to be sidetracked and held hostage,
and then indulging in the same.
Especially, when ad hominen is a large part of that argument.
If you claim the other person to be a fool.
Why join in and follow that path?
I feel the problem with this phenomena is that it leads to over bloated generalizations,
and ever larger and wider exaggerated claims.
These will have no credible facts and basically amount to slander.
This then becomes the antithesis of the original topic.
Leaving all the hall marks of a dichotomy of extremist political wings.
There are several very good posters here who recognize these distractional moves,
and are able to keep the post in the less exotic and on topic.
I do not believe it matters if someone is right or left wing,
as long as they use a reasoned argument based on the topic with the relevant facts.
It is true, those who see themselves as innately correct may snigger at the others opinion,
but at least the argumentation should have its own merits.
Oh!, and of course, he who sniggers last, sniggers longest..................
I will leave it at that as I can see your next appointment has already arrived.