Views: 2294|Replies: 11

Why Googles goofed................. [Copy link] 中文

Post time 2010-3-29 02:07:46 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2010-3-29 02:09:34 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2010-3-29 08:48:25 |Display all floors
Desa,

Your article disputes your whole claim of style of substance.

Google has integrity and I support their decision.  China did not allow a fair market for their product.
How many times did searches get redirected to baidu?  Also, it google got attacked and intellectual property stolen.
America is the great innovator and China the great imitator - everything get's ripped off and re-packaged.
Add on the censorship and it makes for a very dirty place to do business.

One thing I know about working with google is they protect their product and their integrity.  
I worked at an advertising firm that sent google millions and no matter what, you could not pay enough to break any of their rules.
I respect that - they can't be bought.  They ensure fairness in the market by not taking bribes or being swayed by advertising $$$$
And that is what makes them so popular and successful - they are respected.  They deliver results and it's a level playing field to the smallest
and largest advertiser.  That's a good company IMO and certainly one that does not choose style over substance.

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2010-3-29 09:43:20 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2010-3-29 09:46:34 |Display all floors
I just explained their reasons.  And it's not an attack.  They were attacked first.  Intellectual property was stolen.  FACT

And they didn't gain any 'style' points.  The decision made their stocks drop.  You have no point.

Use magic tools Report

Post time 2010-3-29 10:14:32 |Display all floors
Reminder: Author is prohibited or removed, and content is automatically blocked

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 5Rank: 5

Post time 2010-3-29 10:33:32 |Display all floors
I respectfully disagree Desa.  Style points don't pay the bills.  China did not provide a fair market to work within.  You can admit to that at least?

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.