- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 1231 Hour
- Reading permission
Stern Hu admitted taking bribes...
Mr Hu, an Australian citizen, has admitted to taking $1 million in bribes. Likewise, his three colleagues, Chinese citizens, admitted to taking bribes too.|
Bribery is not uncommon in China, or elsewhere for that matter, but this is going to make it difficult for Mr Hu to avoid a jail sentence. We don't really want Mr Hu in China, if and when convicted, best to have him serve out his sentence in Australia.
Rio Tinto Employees Say They Took Bribes in China
By DAVID BARBOZA
Published: March 22, 2010
SHANGHAI — Three employees of Rio Tinto, the British-Australian mining giant, agreed to plead guilty Monday to taking bribes while working for the company in China, stunning confessions on the opening day of their three-day trial here.
Tom Connor, Australia’s consul-general in Shanghai, walked away after speaking to journalists about the trial of three employees of Rio Tinto, the British-Australian mining giant, who agreed to plead guilty Monday to taking bribes while working for the company in China.
The employees, including Stern Hu, a senior executive and Australian citizen, admitted to receiving several million dollars of bribes, according to their lawyers. A fourth employee is also expected to plead guilty.
The proceedings were largely closed to the public, but the Australian consul general in Shanghai said that Mr. Hu — the focus of the case — had admitted in court Monday to receiving some of the $1 million in bribes prosecutors accused him of taking while at Rio Tinto.
Mr. Hu and the three Chinese employees were detained last July in a high profile corruption case that at the time rocked the global steel industry and strained diplomatic relations between China and Australia.
After nine months in detention, Mr. Hu and his three colleagues are on trial this week at the Shanghai No.1 Intermediate Court, accused of accepting about $12 million in bribes and also stealing commercial secrets from Chinese state-owned companies.
Each of the defendants could face up to 10 years in jail if they plead guilty to accepting bribes, one of their lawyers said.
In a statement after the opening day of the trial Monday, the Australian consul general in Shanghai, Tom Connor, said Mr. Hu made “some admissions” and acknowledged taking some of the money.
Zhang Peihong, a lawyer for another Rio Tinto employee standing trial, Wang Yong, said his client had agreed to plead guilty to accepting about $1 million in bribes — much less than the $10 million he is accused of taking.
A spokesman for Rio Tinto declined comment Monday.
The guilty pleas, which are expected to be formally entered Tuesday, are an abrupt turnabout in the case. Australia had pressed China for months, demanding a fair and transparent legal process and hinting that the employees may have been framed. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd of Australia also warned recently that “the world will be watching” the trial.
And for much of the past year, Rio Tinto, one of the world’s biggest producers of iron ore, has defended its employees, saying the company has no evidence they engaged in wrongdoing.
The four employees were initially accused of espionage, which would have fallen under tough Chinese state secrets law, and of causing China “enormous economic losses.” But in August, the four employees were formally charged with lesser offenses: bribery and stealing commercial secrets.
The trial focused Monday only on the bribery issue. On Tuesday or Wednesday, the court is expected to shift its focus to the commercial secrets charges.
Many Western executives doing business in China have said that they worried that the Rio Tinto employees — Mr. Hu, Mr. Wang, Ge Minqiang and Liu Caikui — might have been unfairly detained because of business disputes with government-owned companies; and that other foreign executives could be targeted.
The timing of the case seemed ominous. Shortly before the July detentions, the Chinese steel industry association had complained about the skyrocketing price of iron ore and criticized Rio Tinto and other foreign suppliers for a breakdown in contract talks on iron ore prices.
The detentions also came after Rio Tinto scrapped plans to accept a $19.5 billion investment from Chinalco, one of the biggest state-owned Chinese mining groups.
Beijing has said that this was a criminal case and has pressed Australian officials and others to avoid “politicizing” the case.
Yet because Australia is one of the leading suppliers of iron ore to China — iron ore worth billions of dollars and intended for the Chinese booming steel industry — the case has become a concern for the top leaders of both countries.
Legal experts said the July detentions and initial allegations that the four Rio Tinto employees were stealing state secrets also suggested the government may have been using the case to punish Rio Tinto.
Western executives said they were alarmed because in the days after the detentions were announced last July, a spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry described the accused as spies, and the Chinese state-owned media published articles saying it was the Rio Tinto employees who were bribing government officials to get access to sensitive documents.
Yet in the nine months since the four were detained, the Chinese authorities have announced no other arrests of steel industry officials for bribing Rio Tinto employees or trading in government secrets.
Prosecutors reduced the charges to bribery and stealing commercial trade secrets after Australian and even American officials said they were concerned about the case and what it would mean for foreign executives working here.
On Friday, Rio Tinto said that it had formed a joint venture with Chinalco to develop an iron ore project in Africa.
On Monday, Rio Tinto’s chief executive, Tom Albanese, spoke at the China Development Forum in Beijing, and pledged to work with China to find mineral resources in China and overseas.
Chen Xiaoduan contributed research.