Author: ktbond

What are the targets that TRULY matter in WWIII?   [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2018-12-15 23:10:49 |Display all floors
This post was edited by Jaaja at 2018-12-16 15:05
ktbond Post time: 2018-12-14 22:02
>>>> you (and your country) gets charged for crimes against humanity for targeting civilians
remember that world history has always been written by the victors.

Keep that in mind, and read below.

"the kings" are the capital oligarchs with a long history of financing wars and "revolutions"

Yet these are not kings. They are the bank. They may finance wars, but that money and everything it creates must be created before the war even breaks.

I am not interested in the outcome of "the war"....  Let me spell it out for you dumb bleep... I am keen to PREVENT such a war by nipping it in the bud.

No you are not, and that was evident in your initial post:

As soon as nuclear war breaks out, fire multiple nuclear warheads at the above.

Your scenario implies that that the nuclear war was already broken out, and your first reaction to it was to hit your chosen targets (social media corporations, profitable enterprises, and residential addresses of wealthy individuals).

How can we lose the war when your "king" is headless and cannot sign paychecks anymore

Because the banks' (which you incorrectly refer to as kings) job was done already before the war. They had financed building the fleets of ships and planes, and their only job now is to wait and hope that their bet of the winner of that war plays out.

And because you are now hitting targets that have no effect on outcome of the war (while the enemies are hitting your military targets) you will lose the war.

Your enemy will win, and they get to write the history. They will write you off as the war criminal that hit civilian targets.

But that will not happen. Your generals will not be so stupid as to follow your hopeless strategy. They will stage a military coup, and you would be their first target.


Even if you change your initial scenario from first reaction to nuclear war (that had already broken out), into a pre-emptive first strike, you would still lose because your first strike does not hit the enemy's military targets - but their retaliation will hit your military targets.

You will have done your terrorist attack, but you will again lose the war and the enemy gets to write the history.

Turdhill who's no doubt rotting in eternal hell firebombed 500k Dresden civilians to their next life was never charged.

Exactly, because he won the war. You would not.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2018-12-16 21:34:38 |Display all floors
>>> these are not kings. They are the bank. They may finance wars, but that money and everything it creates must be created before the war even breaks <<<

Do not feign ignorance low life. Bank accounts are OWNED by the financiers.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2018-12-16 21:36:50 |Display all floors
>>>> Your scenario implies that that the nuclear war was already broken out, and your first reaction to it was to hit your chosen targets (social media corporations, profitable enterprises, and residential addresses of wealthy individuals). <<<<

IF the powers that be in Russia and China make it clear that the financiers will be targeted they WILL NOT DARE TO START WWIII. Capice thick bleep????

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2018-12-16 21:39:28 |Display all floors
>>> you are now hitting targets that have no effect on outcome of the war (while the enemies are hitting your military targets) you will lose the war <<<

If the bleeping teewats that are keen to start a war know that they'd perish before others they'd think twice before funding them wars.  How many times do I have to spell it out for you thick bleep?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 2018-12-17 11:33:23 |Display all floors
ktbond Post time: 2018-12-16 21:36
>>>> Your scenario implies that that the nuclear war was already broken out, and your first reaction ...
IF the powers that be in Russia and China make it clear that the financiers will be targeted they WILL NOT DARE TO START WWIII.


Why do you think they want to start WW3 in the first place? They make more money without the war, but if a war is to break out, rest assured that they can arrange their assets so that they will profit anyway, and regardless of what your first targets in the war are - especially if you kindly let them know in advance.

Don't forget that many of those financiers have invested to China as well, and they make lot of money here. Much more than they would have to gain from a war.

That kind of economic integration is what has created peace in Western Europe after WW2, and that is how you create peace globally in future - not by childish threats.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2018-12-17 22:36:39 |Display all floors
Jaaja Post time: 2018-12-17 11:33
Why do you think they want to start WW3 in the first place? They make more money without the war ...
  1. Why do you think they want to start WW3 in the first place?
Copy code
same reasons they started WWI and WWII me demented bleep

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2018-12-18 16:14:37 |Display all floors
ktbond Post time: 2018-12-17 22:36
same reasons they started WWI and WWII me demented bleep

What is the name of that insect crawling in your avatar?

It never needs to rest, eat or do anything in between.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.