Views: 991|Replies: 5

THE SCOTTISH REFERENDUM THAT NEVER WAS - REVOTE IS NECESSARY. [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-9-20 22:44:11 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2014-9-21 08:14

THE MOST GLARING ANOMALY IN THE SCOTTISH REFERENDUM IS THAT FIVE DIFFERENT POLLS TAKEN JUST ONE DAY BEFORE THE VOTE SAID THE MARGIN OF VICTORY WAS "TOO CLOSE TO CALL", GIVING A UNIFORM ESTIMATE OF 48% YES AND 52% NO, WITH A GAP OF 3-4% AT THE MOST, WHICH REPRESENTS AN ACTUAL DIFFERENCE OF ONLY 1-2% AT THE MOST WHEN MEASURING THE SUPPORT FOR EACH SIDE, AS THE VOTER OF ONE SIDE MUST BE SUBTRACTED FROM THE VOTERS OF THE OTHER SIDE.

BUT THE REPORTED RESULT OF THE REFERENDUM WAS AN ASTOUNDING 44.7% YES AND 55.3% NO, REPRESENTING A GAP OF 10.6% THAT NO POLL COULD HAVE MISSED JUST ONE DAY BEFORE THE VOTE, WHATEVER THE LIMITATIONS THE POLLS MAY HAVE.

THIS IS PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE THAT THE REFERENDUM DOES NOT REPRESENT THE WILL OF THE SCOTTISH VOTERS, AND NEEDS TO BE RECOUNTED, AND IF NOT RECOUNTED, IT NEEDS TO BE RE-VOTED.

RE-VOTE!!!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member CD top contributor in April 2015 Most Popular Member Medal of honor Medal of honor

Post time 2014-9-21 08:22:23 |Display all floors
Do you think that posting the same thing under many different headings will make it right?

It is over, your side lost, it was fair, get over it and move on instead of being a cry baby

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-9-21 09:03:08 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2014-9-22 05:40

SCOTTISH INDEPENDENCE MIGHT HAVE ACTUALLY WON THE REFERENDUM!?

Whose side lost?  It has never been satisfactorily proven that the Scottish independence side lost.  The referendum came down with a 44.7% YES and 55.3% NO, but all the other polls just 1 day, and even 2 days, before the referendum said the difference between the two sides was "too close to call" at 48% YES and 52% NO.  What my post proved is that the REFERENDUM is the one that is unlikely to be true, not that it was not held, but that it was not truly representative of the Scottish voters, who had just been surveyed a total of at least 7 different times in the two days preceding the referendum with a consistent 48% YES and 52% NO votes.  The Referendum has some very queer rules and practices, like having a cavernous Royal Highland Counting Center in Edinburgh where the counting tables are spread out at the perimeter of the hangar, with almost no possibility of any monitor to see what is going on even halfway across the hall.  It also has no handover verification of the ballot boxes for safekeeping in the event that a recount is needed.  In fact, it miraculously decided before the vote that NO RECOUNT WILL BE ALLOWED!  What kind of a "democratic vote" is this where NO RECOUNT IS ALLOWED?

There are enough anomalies in this referendum you can drive not just truck through it, but as the size of the Royal Highlands Counting Center demonstrates, you can even park several B52 bombers into it.

The best one can call this referendum is a SWISS CHEESE REFERENDUM, full of holes and lots of air.  They wasted the hopes of a believing Scotland and turned it into despair.  The only way for England to regain the trust and friendship of the Scottish people is to admit its mistakes and schedule a recount, or if the ballots have been incorrectly stored, a REVOTE!

WE THOUGHT U.K. IS AN EXPONENT OF FULL DEMOCRACY, SO HOW COME THERE IS SO VERY LITTLE TO SHOW FOR IT IN THE SCOTTISH REFERENDUM?  WHAT GOOD IS A VIBRANT CAMPAIGN IF THE VOTES OF THE SCOTS ARE NOT CERTIFIABLY AND VERIFIABLY COUNTED?  WHAT GOOD IS A PROMISE, IF IT DOES NOT HAVE TO BE FULFILLED?



Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2014-9-22 02:42:35 |Display all floors
This post was edited by abramicus at 2014-9-22 02:44

NOW, it has become quite clear why UK was willing to extend its powers to the Scottish Parliament in a special deal, called the Edinburgh Agreement, to have a referendum held in Scotland, with the electorate loaded in its favor by half a million English-born Scottish residents, another third of a million non-UK-born foreigner immigrants to Scotland whose visas depend on the good graces of London, and why the SNP virtually agreed without further internal deliberation, to retain servitude under the British monarchy even in the event of its independence, to retain servitude to the British Pound that can only be minted in the UK, to retain servitude to NATO and the EU . . . because it was after all just another dog and pony show, to put a final nail on the coffin of William Wallace, and create an official declaration of surrender by the Scottish people to the English crown through the mechanism of a referendum.

The only glitch in this otherwise well-orchestrated play was that the final referendum results varied so far from all 7 polls taken 1 to 2 days before the vote, that constitute a VERIFIABLE and CREDIBLE proof that the Scottish people did not have the "Chance of a China Man" to express their will in the results of the referendum.

Let US therefore enter this as an UNVERIFIABLE AND THEREFORE INVALID SCOTTISH REFERENDUM of September 18, 2014 in the Annals of Chinese History, as we record the events of the world around us, near and far.  And learn, that when the British preach about referendums, they only mean those that they can manipulate to cheat the voters of their real choice, and betray them, in their deepest interests.  To the archiver of Chinese history, let this be entered as the final chapter of Scottish independence.  May heaven bless its kindly people and have mercy on their descendants.




Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member CD top contributor in April 2015 Most Popular Member Medal of honor Medal of honor

Post time 2014-9-22 08:46:50 |Display all floors
abramicus Post time: 2014-9-22 02:42
NOW, it has become quite clear why UK was willing to extend its powers to the Scottish Parliament in ...

Why are you a lone in failing to accept the truth, millions of Scots are getting on with their lifes in complete acceptance, you are ploughing a lone furrow

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2018 Most Popular Member

Post time 2014-9-22 09:04:57 |Display all floors
A lot of the no voters were swayed at the last minute by camerons promises according to Salmond
now they feel cheated.....
they should man up and and take responsibilty........when has cameron ever told the truth anyway..
if you want something in life get off your backside, and do it yourself!! don't rely on others to do it for you

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.