Chinadaily BBS - Talk to China Daily - Who is more believable? TraderVic or Northwest?

Guest: Login | Register | Search | FAQ

Chinadaily BBS » News Talk» Talk to China Daily» Who is more believable? TraderVic or Northwest?

Last Thread

Next Thread

emucentral (JB)
Super Member
Rank: 6

UID 61916
Digest Posts 0
Credits 11396
Posts 10988
Registered 2005-4-4
Location Melbourne Oz 墨尔本- 澳洲
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by tradervic at 2009-11-7 10:33
So... which administration we are at odds with? <New York Accent> Youze gotta a problem with my English?!

Nothing to worry about Matt, just taking a bit of "poetic license", although I do reject many of the linguistic pronouncements of Noah Webster !

2009-11-7 08:52 AM

#41

seneca (seneca)
Super Member
Rank: 6

UID 21228
Digest Posts 0
Credits 15461
Posts 14014
Registered 2004-1-22
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by liuyedao at 2009-11-6 22:11

Congratulations! ... this what I have to say to tradervic.

Since he received support from an undereducated German loser.

In Harmless' case you can see where over-education leads: He has to dumb down to accommodate eternal intellectual and moral nonentities such as YOU, Mr Liu Maodong!

You have zero credibility for the simple fact that you are nothing personal nor identifiable except a clone that does what it is told to do by its handlers.

The credibility gap you have is the same that the Chinese authorities have with their own audiences.

You lack originality, Mr Liu Maodong. Where is your self-worth?

2009-11-7 09:49 AM

#42

harmless
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 274763
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1476
Posts 1406
Registered 2009-10-2
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by tradervic at 2009-11-6 22:27

... that is another way of looking at the issue.

You mean my "lost thing" ?

2009-11-7 09:55 AM

#43

harmless
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 274763
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1476
Posts 1406
Registered 2009-10-2
Status Offline

The truth in this poll can not be found in the "rigged" voting (since there are too many ghosts),

but rather who is gathering more direct contributers to this threat.

[ Last edited by harmless at 2009-11-7 10:24 AM ]

2009-11-7 10:23 AM

#44

liuyedao
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 262645
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1664
Posts 1582
Registered 2009-9-9
Location Northern Capital
Status Online

QUOTE:

Originally posted by seneca at 2009-11-7 09:49
The credibility gap you have is the same that the Chinese authorities have with their own audiences. ...

I agree that Chinese government lost credibility when they allowed alien parasites like you to abuse Chinese girl in Chinese soil.

2009-11-7 10:37 AM

#45

liuyedao
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 262645
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1664
Posts 1582
Registered 2009-9-9
Location Northern Capital
Status Online

QUOTE:

Originally posted by emucentral at 2009-11-7 05:58
Hmm, this is a complex choice.

So do I support someone whose English sometimes leaves me puzzled, who quotes widely and who has been known to defend an administration I do not agree with ?

Or ...

I know that's the only quality you may be proud of when facing me, emucc, English pronunciation!

2009-11-7 10:39 AM

#46

liuyedao
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 262645
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1664
Posts 1582
Registered 2009-9-9
Location Northern Capital
Status Online

QUOTE:

Originally posted by saltandpepper at 2009-11-7 04:30
Who know where you received your paycheck from?
The mother of all terrorists ?

Beware of him, he'll be able to infiltrate into your computer and steal your data.

2009-11-7 10:40 AM

#47

esoteriksky
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 91879
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1214
Posts 1113
Registered 2006-2-26
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by harmless at 2009-11-7 10:23
The truth in this poll can not be found in the "rigged" voting (since there are too many ghosts),

but rather who is gathering more direct contributers to this threat.

This thread is like a microsom for the problems of democracy

1. often it turns into a popularity contest instead  of being based on the issues
2. ballot box stuffing
3. one side often starts a slur campaign
4. often the wrong side wins

Anyway I would always vote for someone who

tries to contribute positive information and
doesn't find it necessary to try to win an argument by initiating personal insults
doesn't not repeat the same points over and over again,
especially points that are not contemporary and not really relevant
or doesn't over generalizes to the point of being prejudice
or is  not completely biased on every topic,
or never scapegoats leaders and institutions that do not coincide with his own bias
sometimes concedes  points that do not side with his own bias.
never blames others of what he himself is most guilty of
is sincere- never caring more for scoring points in an argument than trying to understand both sides of an argument
never  represents them self as representing a whole nation who of course could not have many differing points of view.
or  considers making a conciliatory gestures to show he is a man of good character that always attempts to be fair and respects the people he is speaking to even if they have differing points of view.

[ Last edited by esoteriksky at 2009-11-7 11:24 AM ]

2009-11-7 11:05 AM

#48

wowzers (Andrew)
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 29369
Digest Posts 0
Credits 4683
Posts 4362
Registered 2004-5-22
Location Guangzhou
Status Offline

I like both these posters.
They both bring a lot to the table. (In their own way)

Matt's Crab Shack has provided much reading material for me.
And NW brings a certain perspective to the proceedings.

I am thankful to have both of them here and active.

2009-11-7 12:15 PM

#49

whampoa (whampoa)
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 34794
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3350
Posts 3196
Registered 2004-8-7
Status Offline

So,

QUOTE:

Originally posted by tradervic at 2009-11-6 21:52

Who is more believable? TraderVic or Northwest?

Northwest and I have had a series of rather nasty spats over the last couple of years - over a great many issues. However, in most of the cases - one item stands out, my choice to fully reveal my real life identity as a sign of integrity versus Northwest/Augusten/Liuyedao's insistance to hide behind a faceless avatar and hypocritically accuse others of being spies.

So, I am asking you - the peanut gallery of the China Daily BBS - who is more believable?

Feel free to unleash "the human flesh engine" on the both of us - it will interesting to see who digs up what.

This poll will be duplicated in the English Study Forum - to see if any of the actual Chinese forumites have any opinion on this subject.

You want to the "peanuts" in CD BBS to say that you are more credible because you show your face?

Is that how your credibility is founded upon -- in the face?

Very superficial is what I think of YOU!

---
Whampoa

2009-11-7 03:00 PM

#50

liuyedao
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 262645
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1664
Posts 1582
Registered 2009-9-9
Location Northern Capital
Status Online

QUOTE:

Originally posted by wowzers at 2009-11-7 12:15
I like both these posters.
They both bring a lot to the table. (In their own way)

Matt's Crab Shack has provided much reading material for me.
And NW brings a certain perspective to the procee ...

Thanks for the modest and balanced stance.

2009-11-7 08:28 PM

#51

baofeng
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 247648
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1089
Posts 989
Registered 2009-7-20
Status Offline

Pointless

Another pointless thread from from someone with too much time on his hands but insufficient capacity to spend it productively.

Forget him Liu- he's not even worth a reply.

2009-11-7 09:20 PM

#52

peterd
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 177396
Digest Posts 0
Credits 533
Posts 515
Registered 2008-10-13
Status Offline

Pot .... kettle ...

QUOTE:

Originally posted by baofeng at 2009-11-7 21:20
Another pointless thread from from someone with too much time on his hands but insufficient capacity to spend it productively.

Another good description of yourself, peterb / funtogo

2009-11-7 09:28 PM

#53

peterd
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 177396
Digest Posts 0
Credits 533
Posts 515
Registered 2008-10-13
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by liuyedao at 2009-11-7 20:28
Thanks for the modest and balanced stance.

A stance which is the exact opposite of your attitude to anything which is not China or Chinese.

For example, your support for your racist buddies is well known. As is your bigoted views of foreign nations all of which you have never visited.

At least TraderVic has made the effort to visit China

2009-11-7 09:30 PM

#54

voterigger
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 154666
Digest Posts 0
Credits 596
Posts 579
Registered 2008-1-6
Location Helsinki
Status Offline

Hmmm ...

Which way to go with this poll?

2009-11-7 09:31 PM

#55

voterigger
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 154666
Digest Posts 0
Credits 596
Posts 579
Registered 2008-1-6
Location Helsinki
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by whampoa at 2009-11-7 15:00
Very superficial is what I think of YOU!

Your words are meaningless as you are a well-known China-bashing racist troll from Singapore ...

2009-11-7 09:32 PM

#56

huang262
Moderator
Rank: 7

UID 81880
Digest Posts 0
Credits 2806
Posts 2563
Registered 2005-10-11
Location Southeast Asia
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by tradervic at 2009-11-6 22:34
So it will be fun to see him and wchao37 teaming up to stuff the box in your favor. Who knows, you may get 100+ votes.

Doing a bit of hedging, huh TV? If you get more votes it's because you're more trustworthy. If NW gets more votes it's because people are stuffing the box.

So why do a poll in the first place? I guess trolling is not beneath you?

2009-11-7 11:01 PM

#57

wowzers (Andrew)
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 29369
Digest Posts 0
Credits 4683
Posts 4362
Registered 2004-5-22
Location Guangzhou
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by huang262 at 2009-11-7 23:01

Doing a bit of hedging, huh TV? If you get more votes it's because you're more trustworthy. If NW gets more votes it's because people are stuffing the box.

So why do a poll in the first plac ...

Lemme guess you voted and you voted against Matt or did you vote for NW?
Either way, I know how you voted

2009-11-7 11:26 PM

#58

saltandpepper
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 215881
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1119
Posts 1119
Registered 2009-3-27
Status Offline

Reply #38 tradervic's post

Ratan Tata ?

That could well be your 'full time' job, but that doesn't stop Mother of all terrorists to recruit 'part timer'.
Or who knows, you may be just one of their countless 'volunteer mouthpieces'.

By the way, since you preposterously claimed that China is already a "very advanced and developed" country, which used to be referred to as 'First World', please amuse us more with your "very advanced knowledge" by also claiming that the country of the company that you're working for is also a "very advanced and developed" country as a 'First World'.

We already have a JOKER in this BBS by the latest name of 'harmless'.

.

2009-11-7 11:49 PM

#59

saltandpepper
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 215881
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1119
Posts 1119
Registered 2009-3-27
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by seneca at 2009-11-7 09:49

You have zero credibility ...

A maggot and loser dreamer like you has ZERO credibility.

2009-11-7 11:56 PM

#60

Printable Version | Email to Friend | Subscription | Favorites


Forum Rules	Feedback	Privacy