Guest:  Login | Register | Search | FAQ  
 

 

Last Thread Next Thread
 38  1/2  1  2  > 
 Post New Thread  Post New Poll  Post New Reply
Subject: China slams U.S. for sending Uighurs to Palau
 
duanyihong
Junior Member
Rank: 3Rank: 3


UID 167746
Digest Posts 0
Credits 736
Posts 296
Registered 2008-6-26
Status Offline
China slams U.S. for sending Uighurs to Palau

BEIJING (Reuters) – China lashed out at the United States on Monday after the Obama administration sent six Uighur Chinese detainees from the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay to the Pacific island nation of Palau.

China has repeatedly demanded that the Uighurs be returned but the U.S. government has said it could not do so because they would face persecution, and it has searched for months for a nation willing to accept them.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu said the six were "terror suspects" and ought to have been sent back to China.

"We express our extreme dissatisfaction and resolute opposition that the United States disregarded the Chinese side and insisted on sending the terror suspects to a third place," Ma said in a statement on the ministry's website (www.mfa.gov.cn).

China had made "solemn representations" to the United States about the issue, he added.

The six belonged to a terror group listed by the United Nations, and the United States had a duty to hand them over, Ma said.

"China demands the United States abide by U.N. resolutions and fulfil its international anti-terror obligations, stop sending such terror suspects tofulfill third places, and should instead repatriate them to China as soon as possible," he added.

"China opposes any country taking these terror suspects."

The Uighurs, who come from China's largely Muslim far-west region of Xinjiang, were swept up by the U.S. government during the Afghanistan war launched after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

The choice of Palau is likely to further infuriate China as the island is one of only 23 countries that recognize Taiwan over Beijing.

Under its "one China" policy, Beijing claims self-ruled Taiwan as its own and insists on eventual unification, by force if necessary.

The transfer leaves 215 detainees at the detention camp that President Barack Obama has pledged to close by January 22, though political and legal hurdles are making it difficult for his administration to meet that goal.

Palau has agreed to take up to 12 Uighurs. Seven still remain at the controversial Guantanamo prison which was set up by the Bush administration to house terror suspects. Four other Uighurs were moved to Bermuda in June.
2009-11-3 10:23 AM#1
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
funtogo
Junior Member
Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 248579
Digest Posts 0
Credits 961
Posts 907
Registered 2009-7-22
Status Offline
The WUC has been supported by the NED, so the U.S. has painted itself into a corner by arresting some of their own foot soldiers.
2009-11-3 11:17 AM#2
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
duanyihong
Junior Member
Rank: 3Rank: 3


UID 167746
Digest Posts 0
Credits 736
Posts 296
Registered 2008-6-26
Status Offline
what will the US do if China does the same thing to it? double standard.
2009-11-3 11:18 AM#3
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
emucentral (JB)
Super Member
Rank: 6Rank: 6


UID 61916
Digest Posts 0
Credits 11396
Posts 10988
Registered 2005-4-4
Location Melbourne Oz 墨尔本- 澳洲
Status Offline
Maybe if China used a tighter definition of who is  a "terrorist", then the rest of the world might take their demands a little more seriously.

While China goes on and accuses the DL of causing everything from riots in Lhasa to carbon pollution and rising sea levels*, China's allegations will always be suspect.


(* that bit is what's known as a joke, but it admirably demonstrates the demonising of the DL which takes place by China's mouthpieces)
2009-11-3 11:55 AM#4
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
liuyedao
Junior Member
Rank: 3Rank: 3


UID 262645
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1669
Posts 1587
Registered 2009-9-9
Location Northern Capital
Status Offline


QUOTE:
Originally posted by emucentral at 2009-11-3 11:55
Maybe if China used a tighter definition of who is  a "terrorist", then the rest of the world might take their demands a little more seriously. ...
The terrorists also in the US terrorist list, emucc.

You trust your ally sheriff, don't you?
2009-11-3 12:29 PM#5
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
Exergy
Junior Member
Rank: 3Rank: 3



UID 246707
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1507
Posts 1417
Registered 2009-7-16
Status Offline


QUOTE:
Originally posted by duanyihong at 2009-11-3 10:23
BEIJING (Reuters) – China lashed out at the United States on Monday after the Obama administration sent six Uighur Chinese detainees from the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay to the Pacific  ...
What evidence does Beijing have on these 6 terror!sts other than the US picked them up in Afghanistan.
2009-11-3 12:50 PM#6
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
satsu_jin
Super Member
Rank: 6Rank: 6


UID 138675
Digest Posts 0
Credits 11619
Posts 10280
Registered 2007-6-26
Location 日本国東京都
Status Offline


QUOTE:
Originally posted by Exergy at 2009-11-3 13:50



What evidence does Beijing have on these 6 terror!sts other than the US picked them up in Afghanistan.
What do you think was the reason for being there? They certainly did not book a sightseeing/study tour nor did they partake in any social activities in Afghanistan.
2009-11-3 07:04 PM#7
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
harmless
Junior Member
Rank: 3Rank: 3


UID 274763
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1487
Posts 1415
Registered 2009-10-2
Status Offline


QUOTE:
Originally posted by satsu_jin at 2009-11-3 19:04



What do you think was the reason for being there? They certainly did not book a sightseeing/study tour nor did they partake in any social activities in Afghanistan.
Lack of co-operation in case of Iran, Myanmar, Zimbabwe, Sudan, NK, etc. etc.

What do you expect ?

A one-way-road ?

2009-11-3 07:09 PM#8
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
satsu_jin
Super Member
Rank: 6Rank: 6


UID 138675
Digest Posts 0
Credits 11619
Posts 10280
Registered 2007-6-26
Location 日本国東京都
Status Offline


QUOTE:
Originally posted by harmless at 2009-11-3 20:09



Lack of co-operation in case of Iran, Myanmar, Zimbabwe, Sudan, NK, etc. etc.

What do you expect ?

A one-way-road ?

A revealing statement that shows that China NEVER must trust western powers. Terrorism for them is limited to terrorists who target the west. All other terrorist activities are fine and dandy. Tkx for this.
2009-11-3 07:13 PM#9
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
harmless
Junior Member
Rank: 3Rank: 3


UID 274763
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1487
Posts 1415
Registered 2009-10-2
Status Offline
Building trust requires always two.

But do not jump to conclusions because of the reasons I stated above, since those are by far not the only reasons.

Another, not less important reason was the danger of receiving the death penalty in China.

The country who was supposed to get them has no death penalty.

[ Last edited by harmless at 2009-11-3 07:21 PM ]
2009-11-3 07:19 PM#10
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
satsu_jin
Super Member
Rank: 6Rank: 6


UID 138675
Digest Posts 0
Credits 11619
Posts 10280
Registered 2007-6-26
Location 日本国東京都
Status Offline


QUOTE:
Originally posted by harmless at 2009-11-3 20:19
Building trust requires always two.

But do not jump to conclusions because of the reasons I stated above, since those are by far not the only reasons.

Another, not less important reason was t ...
I understood your message which is basically the western way to tackle terrorist problems. Once again, tkx.
2009-11-3 07:27 PM#11
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
harmless
Junior Member
Rank: 3Rank: 3


UID 274763
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1487
Posts 1415
Registered 2009-10-2
Status Offline


QUOTE:
Originally posted by satsu_jin at 2009-11-3 19:27



I understood your message which is basically the western way to tackle terrorist problems. Once again, tkx.
China is doing a similar policy when it comes to the "island province" .
2009-11-3 07:31 PM#12
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
satsu_jin
Super Member
Rank: 6Rank: 6


UID 138675
Digest Posts 0
Credits 11619
Posts 10280
Registered 2007-6-26
Location 日本国東京都
Status Offline


QUOTE:
Originally posted by harmless at 2009-11-3 20:31


China is doing a similar policy when it comes to the "island province" .
Oh, I didn't know that there are terrorists at work. That's breaking news.
2009-11-3 07:33 PM#13
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
harmless
Junior Member
Rank: 3Rank: 3


UID 274763
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1487
Posts 1415
Registered 2009-10-2
Status Offline
Grrrrrrrrrrr
2009-11-3 07:37 PM#14
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
seneca (seneca)
Super Member
Rank: 6Rank: 6



UID 21228
Digest Posts 0
Credits 15472
Posts 14025
Registered 2004-1-22
Status Offline


QUOTE:
Originally posted by satsu_jin at 2009-11-3 19:13


A revealing statement that shows that China NEVER must trust western powers. Terrorism for them is limited to terrorists who target the west. All other terrorist activities are fine and dandy.  ...
And I was so naive as to think that Germans living in Tokyo were "Westerners" too...
2009-11-3 09:08 PM#15
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
seneca (seneca)
Super Member
Rank: 6Rank: 6



UID 21228
Digest Posts 0
Credits 15472
Posts 14025
Registered 2004-1-22
Status Offline


QUOTE:
Originally posted by liuyedao at 2009-11-3 12:29


The terrorists also in the US terrorist list, emucc.

You trust your ally sheriff, don't you?
And only simpletons believe the U.S. rapproachement with China over what factions or groups are to be regarded as "terrorists" was based on a careful, impartialand rational review of the situation...

Themajority of people around the world believes the U.S. made a kowtow to the Chinese in order to get their cooperation in the pursuit of other "terrorists". It was a quid-pro-quod sort ofgamble.
2009-11-3 09:11 PM#16
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
seneca (seneca)
Super Member
Rank: 6Rank: 6



UID 21228
Digest Posts 0
Credits 15472
Posts 14025
Registered 2004-1-22
Status Offline


QUOTE:
Originally posted by satsu_jin at 2009-11-3 19:04



What do you think was the reason for being there? They certainly did not book a sightseeing/study tour nor did they partake in any social activities in Afghanistan.
Nothing but guesswork, conjectures, suspicions (after all, Uis don't have the money to go on touristjaunts abroad, right?)...
Is that how you want the guilty to be identified? Someone accuses, and that's "proof" for people of your ilk?
So long as China acts so high-handedly it will gain no repsect and trust internationally.
2009-11-3 09:13 PM#17
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
seneca (seneca)
Super Member
Rank: 6Rank: 6



UID 21228
Digest Posts 0
Credits 15472
Posts 14025
Registered 2004-1-22
Status Offline
Those freed from their 8-year long and totally unfair ordeal were happy to arrive in Palau... and the local populace gave them a rousing welcome.

Good on you, Palau people!
2009-11-3 09:15 PM#18
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
satsu_jin
Super Member
Rank: 6Rank: 6


UID 138675
Digest Posts 0
Credits 11619
Posts 10280
Registered 2007-6-26
Location 日本国東京都
Status Offline


QUOTE:
Originally posted by seneca at 2009-11-3 22:08


And I was so naive as to think that Germans living in Tokyo were "Westerners" too...
My "friend",

You remember the old days of the Soviet empire when hundred of jokes about radio Erevan were in circulation?

They all started with - and i quote this in German....

Im Prinzip ja, aber......... (insert what you want)

Is this reply sufficient for you?
2009-11-3 09:27 PM#19
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 
tradervic (Uncle Laowai)
VIP Member
Rank: 8Rank: 8


UID 135031
Digest Posts 0
Credits 24275
Posts 20855
Registered 2007-5-4
Location Cincinnati, OH - U.S.A.
Status Offline
Actually Satsu...



QUOTE:
Originally posted by satsu_jin at 11/3/2009 06:04 AM
What do you think was the reason for being there? They certainly did not book a sightseeing/study tour nor did they partake in any social activities in Afghanistan.
... this issue stems from a very, very bad dicision at the outset of the Afgan campaign to offer bounties for "terrorists" to which more than a fair share of unscruplous bounty hunters grabbing anyone that could be found in both Afganistan and Pakistan.

There was a couple of articles about this back in 2004-2005 timeframe - when the U.S. Armed Forces copped up to that fact when they started to consolidate folks at Gauntamo Bay and realized they were bambozled - from kidnapped kids to senile old men - resulting in the mess that is now.
2009-11-3 09:39 PM#20
View Profile  Send P.M.  Top
 38  1/2  1  2  > 
 Post New Thread  Post New Poll  Post New Reply

  Printable Version | Email to Friend | Subscription | Favorites  


 
Forum Rules Feedback Privacy

Copyright By chinadaily.com.cn. All rights reserved