Chinadaily BBS - United States - 9/11 -- Did it happen the way the Anglos said it did?

Guest: Login | Register | Search | FAQ

Chinadaily BBS » News Talk» United States» 9/11 -- Did it happen the way the Anglos said it did?

Last Thread

Next Thread

mechanic
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 211674
Digest Posts 0
Credits 748
Posts 466
Registered 2009-3-16
Status Offline

Incredible video of the Destruction of the WTC:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y

2009-11-3 05:30 PM

#981

mechanic
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 211674
Digest Posts 0
Credits 748
Posts 466
Registered 2009-3-16
Status Offline

GROUND ZERO: The nuclear demolition of the World Trade Center

http://www.nucleardemolition.com/GZero_Report.pdf

Armando Rozário 123 - Cabo Frio, Brazil - September 17, 2009.

2009-11-3 05:32 PM

#982

mechanic
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 211674
Digest Posts 0
Credits 748
Posts 466
Registered 2009-3-16
Status Offline

Google: 9/11 Cancer

9/11 Firefighters Battling Thyroid Cancer

Rare blood cancer plaguing 9/11 survivors - The Cancer Blog

9/11 CANCER COPS - New York Post

New York - 9-11 Causing Cancer - Runnin' Scared - Village Voice

China Syndrome at the WTC - Radioactive mini-nuke fragments strewn about in the rubble pile.

http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Worby

2009-11-3 05:36 PM

#983

mechanic
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 211674
Digest Posts 0
Credits 748
Posts 466
Registered 2009-3-16
Status Offline

Evidence proving no planes

The number one piece of evidence proving no planes is the Chopper 5 video, with no plane in the wide shot, unstable motion, nose out, fade to black, etc.

http://acebaker.blogspot.com/2009/01/why.html

The fact is, the mainstream news media inserted fake airplane images into video of the exploding twin towers.

2009-11-3 05:37 PM

#984

mechanic
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 211674
Digest Posts 0
Credits 748
Posts 466
Registered 2009-3-16
Status Offline

$100,000 Amateur Video Challenge

Did you or someone you know shoot amateur video of an airplane crash on 9/11? If so, it could net you a hundred grand.

As readers of my work already know, I don't believe any airplanes crashed anywhere on 9/11. All of the airplane crash videos are video composites, says me. Prove me wrong, and make a quick $100,000 U.S.

http://acebaker.blogspot.com/

2009-11-3 05:39 PM

#985

manoj10 (Mr.Tiger)
Super Member
Rank: 6

UID 217947
Digest Posts 0
Credits 6304
Posts 5062
Registered 2009-4-1
Location New Delhi
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by petera at 2009-10-31 14:04

Low yield pure fusion devices are the most likely explanation.It is likely that these devices exist.The Finnish
expert that first proposed the nuking of the towers thought this was the most li ...

You are a pure stupid petera. The problem in your petite logic is that, fusion devices are much powerful than fission devices and are mostly uncontrollable. And your logic of using conventional explosives is absurd because when the device explodes it will vaporise the inner atomic structure in explosives. If at all a fusion device is used it would need a trigger and a controller. Further we won't have seen Manhattan not even New york from the map. What a stupid, dumb person you are.

2009-11-3 05:41 PM

#986

UYA
Primary Member
Rank: 2

UID 241994
Digest Posts 0
Credits 497
Posts 433
Registered 2009-6-28
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by wowzers at 2009-11-3 15:38

That's not your number but this is: (86) 13926188666
Call chairman today and tell him what you think of him pretending to be Chinese.

Hmmmmmmm.......

What happened to my previous post here?

How do you know these things?

2009-11-3 06:03 PM

#987

UYA
Primary Member
Rank: 2

UID 241994
Digest Posts 0
Credits 497
Posts 433
Registered 2009-6-28
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by betrayed at 2009-11-3 14:59

My post asking if I could call you was deleted?

Why?

2009-11-3 06:04 PM

#988

funtogo
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 248579
Digest Posts 0
Credits 961
Posts 907
Registered 2009-7-22
Status Offline

Nano-thermite found in WTC dust

Abstract
We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.
Source: The Open Chemical Physics Journal, vol.2 pp.7-31 Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen. Affiliation: Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark.

2009-11-3 09:35 PM

#989

tradervic (Uncle Laowai)
VIP Member
Rank: 8

UID 135031
Digest Posts 0
Credits 24275
Posts 20855
Registered 2007-5-4
Location Cincinnati, OH - U.S.A.
Status Offline

So...

QUOTE:

Originally posted by petera at 11/2/2009 04:51 PM
There were no planes.The Bureau of Transportation Statistics does not list "AA 77"
as having flown that day.There was no credible wreckage.The damage to the
Pentagon is inconsistent with a B757 crash.The most likely explanation is a missile.
Read Thierry Meyssan's Pentagate and The Big Lie.

... the Pentagon was hit by nuke tipped cruise missile - much like the WTC 1 & 2?

2009-11-3 10:25 PM

#990

funtogo
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 248579
Digest Posts 0
Credits 961
Posts 907
Registered 2009-7-22
Status Offline

re TV

WTC 1 and 2 were probably brought down by nano-thermite, an explosive substance developed by the Lawrence Livermore labs., traces of which were discovered by scientists analyzing the dust produced by the collapse and published in the Open Journal of Chemical Physics.

Whatever drilled holes through 3 walls of the Pentagon is unlikely to have been a large commercial passenger jet.

[ Last edited by funtogo at 2009-11-3 10:38 PM ]

2009-11-3 10:36 PM

#991

harmless
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 274763
Digest Posts 0
Credits 1487
Posts 1415
Registered 2009-10-2
Status Offline

Getting dizzi !

2009-11-3 10:42 PM

#992

funtogo
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 248579
Digest Posts 0
Credits 961
Posts 907
Registered 2009-7-22
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by funtogo at 2009-11-3 21:35
Abstract
We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these sampl ...

Here's the link:

http://www.bentham-open.org/page ... 00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM

2009-11-3 11:09 PM

#993

ragerancher
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 243069
Digest Posts 0
Credits 532
Posts 526
Registered 2009-7-2
Status Online

Right so all these conflicting theories. let's assume they all a right. Here is something of the result:

A remote controlled, missile plane that doesn't exist and was put in afterwards crashed into the twin towers that were rigged with explosives and caused a collapse as each floor had explosives to set off a collapse which was faster than the speed of freefall while a nuclear device detonated below the building leaving no radiation except for the radiation that was and wasn't detected. The building fell like ti would in a controlled demolition whilst it was demolished using a controlled demolition using nukes or conventional explosives or an uncontrolled demolition using explosives on each floor. The steel was turned molten whilst at the same time merely fatiguing and not being molten. The people on the flights never existed whilst at the same time they were kidnapped and there were no witnesses except for the ones that saw there was nothing and a missile and a plane.

Yeh that's gonna be my theory!

2009-11-4 03:02 AM

#994

petera
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 138622
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3042
Posts 3028
Registered 2007-6-26
Status Online

Pentagon

Fatman,a conventional missile would have done the job at the Pentagon.I once again
invite you to read Meyssan's books.Millions have been sold in 28 language editions
around the world.There were no cruise missiles at the WTC.No one has specified that
cruise missiles hit,though some truth seekers think some kind of missile may have been
used.I don't think any kind of missile was used.Too risky and unneccessary.

The fact is the videos show planes that violate natures's laws.And behave unlike objects
in common day to day experience.The are numerous other discrepancies in the videos.
Different videos show different trajectories.Some don't show the plane at all.There are
many witnesses who say they didn't hear or see a plane.There are no witnesses except
media crooks who say they did see the planes.There is no credible wreckage.

The videos were fake.There were no planes.

2009-11-4 05:33 AM

#995

petera
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 138622
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3042
Posts 3028
Registered 2007-6-26
Status Online

Demolition

The demise of the towers was dramatic.The media has stopped showing it in detail,just
as it has stopped showing the impossible interaction between "UA 175" and the South
Tower.

The official explanation of this unique and unprecedented event is utterly absurd and
need not be discussed.The pulverisation of two massive 500,000 ton steel and concrete
structures obviously required explosives of some kind.Imagine turning those collosal
buildings into billowing clouds of dust and hot pyroclastic flows in a few seconds !! Never
has the world seen a spectacle like that.And at the end the "spire",a remnant of the
massive steel core,wilted and disentegrated as though it was made of sand.

How exactly it was done we will never know.Some say thermite was used.The Finnish
expert thinks it was a combination of a small pure fusion device in conjunction with
conventional explosives.I personally favour this explanation since it has been confirmed
by a group of top labs that the tritium level at ground zero was highly elevated.There
has been a great deal of research into finding methods of triggering a pure fusion device
without a fission bomb over the last 60 years.The Anonymous physicist thinks it was
a number of low yield fission devices.Others have proposed exotic weaponry.Since
the evidence was destroyed,it will be impossible for us to determine with certainty what
type or types of weapons or explosives were used.But it is important that people
keep investigating.

2009-11-4 05:51 AM

#996

petera
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 138622
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3042
Posts 3028
Registered 2007-6-26
Status Online

Great posts,Mechanic

Mechanic has provided terrific links,which I will try to follow as I find time.There is a lot of
interesting related information.I had my first look at the melted material at Reactor 4 at
Chernobyl.And learned that there have been several meltdowns over the last 6 decades
in reactors all over the world.Obviously hidden from us by the Zionist media.

2009-11-4 07:54 AM

#997

larrydu
Primary Member
Rank: 2

UID 257364
Digest Posts 0
Credits 122
Posts 122
Registered 2009-8-24
Status Offline

Cicero - and reportedly also Billy the Kid in his last breath - asked the vital question: "Cui Bono?"

Who benefits from 9/11?

Not the Arabs, not the Americans, not the peoples of the world, not even the mythical pilots of the - some would say - equally mythical airplanes.

Think how many times in the past some dramatic event has been used to justify disproportionate response. This could range from the phony Gulf of Tonkin attacks by the North Vietnamese on American ships to the repeated "retaliations" of the Israeli armed forces against the Arabs for some "terrorist" activities. Unfortunately for those who used or even staged such incidents, the bogus Tonkin affair did nothing to prevent an ultimate defeat for the American militarists, just as the flimsy excuse for bombing the Hezbollah in Lebanon a few years ago ended up with the Israelis nursing their black eye.

But regardless of the consequences, in most cases what Eisenhower called the military-industrial complex tend to benefit - war is usually a profitable enterprise for certain privileged people while the average Joe-in-the-street often loses out. For the actual victims of the many Shocks and Awes, however, the result could be catastrophic. The 911 incident, whether internally or externally planned and executed, has seen entire countries decimated, with millions of Muslims killed and wounded and/or dispossessed of their homes. This is the tragedy that should occupy our thoughts, even more than who started 9/11.

2009-11-4 11:28 AM

#998

wiseoldlady (Teri Bach)
Primary Member
Rank: 2

UID 271443
Digest Posts 0
Credits 386
Posts 369
Registered 2009-9-24
Location At home
Status Offline

Ahhh, a refreshing, compassionate, dare I say "wise" voice.......

2009-11-4 11:44 AM

#999

larrydu
Primary Member
Rank: 2

UID 257364
Digest Posts 0
Credits 122
Posts 122
Registered 2009-8-24
Status Offline

Wow, mechanic. Never seen such a non-nuclear explosion (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y) in my life - this video seems good enough to end any controversy. Wonder why they didn't show it in the early days or even weeks that followed 9/11.... Perhaps its might contradict the official version?

I was more sad than shocked when the event was first broadcast, yet never could I have imagined that it would result in the Patriot Act and the invasion of the Middle Eastern countries. It was strange that Americans would become so helpless in seeing their basic fundamental rights taken away, and even stranger that few asked about the "coincidences" involving anthrax. Excerpts (http://www.freefromterror.net/other_articles/gov_anthrax.html):

   The anthrax attacks were concurrent with the debate of Bush’s Patriot Act by Congress and the media.

·    The Senators who received anthrax letters were trying to amend the Patriot Act to protect civil liberties and the innocent.

·    Two Senate democratic leaders received anthrax letters mailed the same day that Senator Feingold blocked an attempt to rush the bill          through without discussion or amendments.

·    And on that very same day, the FBI told the Iowa state lab to
destroy the original batch of the Ames strain, making tracing the
anthrax type more difficult.

·    Senator Leahy received an anthrax threat after he expressed reservations about the Bill. As Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, he managed the debate on the Bill.

·    Senate Majority Leader Daschle received the first Senate anthrax letter as he led the opposition to the original version of the Bill.

·    After receiving the anthrax letter, Daschle switched from supporting a 2 year limit on the Bill, later defending a 4-year sunset clause as the “appropriate balance.”

·    No Republican received an anthrax letter.

·    The House and Senate buildings were closed and not reopened until after the Patriot Act was passed.

·    The Supreme Court was shut down with an anthrax scare the day after the constitutionally-challenged Patriot Act was signed by President Bush.

·    All the contaminated letters contained the Ames strain of anthrax, the DNA of which is traced to the original batch preserved in a university lab in Ames, Iowa. This strain was “weaponized” in Utah into a potent powder with an elaborate secret technique developed at Fort Detrick, Md.[1]

·    The FBI failed to interview Ft. Detrick anthrax experts for two months into their investigation, doing it only after the experts complained to the press of gross incompetence on the part of the FBI.

·    The FBI overruled local homicide detectives who think that an anthrax expert was murdered, possibly because he knew too much.

2009-11-4 11:58 AM

#1000

Printable Version | Email to Friend | Subscription | Favorites


Forum Rules	Feedback	Privacy