Chinadaily BBS - United States - 9/11 -- Did it happen the way the Anglos said it did?

Guest: Login | Register | Search | FAQ

Chinadaily BBS » News Talk» United States» 9/11 -- Did it happen the way the Anglos said it did?

Last Thread

Next Thread

petera
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 138622
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3040
Posts 3026
Registered 2007-6-26
Status Offline

Truth

2009-4-2 05:25 AM

#41

petera
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 138622
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3040
Posts 3026
Registered 2007-6-26
Status Offline

Truth

Two shills in tandem.Half of humanity does not believe the boxcutter conspiracy theory.But the shills
have to make a dishonest living.The idiot called voterigger refuses to use facts to defend the impossible
collision between "UA 175" and the South Tower.Why use facts when your salary depends on hiding and
ridiculing them.Voterigger lives in Helsinki,apparently.It was a Finnish military expert that first pointed out
that the towers were probably nuked with pure fusion devices.

2009-4-2 05:35 AM

#42

bantopost
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 179598
Digest Posts 0
Credits 838
Posts 804
Registered 2008-11-6
Status Offline

Peter, do you ever ask yourself why no one takes you seriously? (Except for the tin foil brigade)
If you can show me a single reputable news organization that does, I will give it a look see.

2009-4-2 06:00 AM

#43

petera
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 138622
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3040
Posts 3026
Registered 2007-6-26
Status Offline

One more shill

I repeat for your benefit: Half of humanity does not believe the boxcutter conspiracy theory.Half of
humanity takes me seriously.The other half apparently takes the "reputable" Rupert Murdoch seriously.
Are you saying Murdoch is loved and respected ? Even in the country of his birth ?

2009-4-2 07:27 AM

#44

bantopost
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 179598
Digest Posts 0
Credits 838
Posts 804
Registered 2008-11-6
Status Offline

Half of humanity can't read. (lies, damn lies and statistics)
So you're telling me you can't provide a single reputable news organization that supports your claim?

2009-4-2 07:34 AM

#45

petera
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 138622
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3040
Posts 3026
Registered 2007-6-26
Status Offline

Physics

Are you telling me that the collision shown to us by the Zionist media (as in the Fairbanks,Hezarkhani,
Courchesne and other fake videos) is real ? If this is your stand can you back it up with physics and
engineering data and calculations ? Can a fragile airframe punch neat slots in massive steel columns
and vanish into them ?

Have you read Orwell's 1984 ?

2009-4-2 07:42 AM

#46

bantopost
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 179598
Digest Posts 0
Credits 838
Posts 804
Registered 2008-11-6
Status Offline

I've wasted enough time on you

Still no reputable news organization

Don't you get tired of pissing into the wind?

2009-4-2 07:48 AM

#47

petera
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 138622
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3040
Posts 3026
Registered 2007-6-26
Status Offline

Disreputable

Can Murdoch,Turner,Eisner and the rest of that little band of Billionaires be considered reputable ?
And lets not forget Warren Cuccurullo.

2009-4-2 10:02 AM

#48

bantopost
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 179598
Digest Posts 0
Credits 838
Posts 804
Registered 2008-11-6
Status Offline

Still pissin' into the wind!

For the last time can you provide any source that is not a looney internet site?
Al-Jezeera, Pravda, Xinhua, Reuters, AP, anybody? (and news not opinion)
And 1984 is a work of fiction just like your claims, I am not surprised that is all you have offered so far.

2009-4-2 10:11 AM

#49

petera
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 138622
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3040
Posts 3026
Registered 2007-6-26
Status Offline

Last time

Banto.For the last time can you back up your claims with either common sense,physics or engineering ?
We do have a world government led by the Zionists.All the news agencies you mention are merely
franchises of the NWO's propaganda arm.

Please don't deny the existence of objective reality.And 1984 is without doubt the greatest novel ever
written.

2009-4-2 11:35 AM

#50

emucentral (JB)
Super Member
Rank: 6

UID 61916
Digest Posts 0
Credits 11396
Posts 10988
Registered 2005-4-4
Location Melbourne Oz 墨尔本- 澳洲
Status Offline

It's all been done to death

The loony tunes "evidence" of fake videos simply doesn't stand up.

They think that wide angle shots taken from low resolution MPEG compressed NTSC TV images should provide enough resolution to see crumpling and other detailed damage and when they cannot see it, they accuse the photos of being fake.

They ignore the mathematical modelling of various universities on the collision, but believe a handful of "15 minutes of fame" loonies.

They conveniently ignore the fact that the original "conspiracy" video compilation was a deliberate fake itself.

They have seriously conflicting versions of the laws of physics wondering why the plane didn't do a cartoon style impact and then slide down the side of the building and simultaneously claim that "thin shell buckling" or whatever means the plane crumples.
They also ignore the impossibility of real time "no-delay" CGI insertion of plane images.
They ignore the fact that any conspiracy would have to involve thousands of co-conspirators (yet there have been no leaks).
They ignore the fact that Bin Laden and co have acknowledged responsibility.
They ignore the fact that there may be more than one person in the Arab world with the same name.
And, of course, they ignore the fact that the level of expertise to carry out such a complex conspiracy is well beyond the capabilities of the US authorities, leaving aside the simple fact that there was no reason to do such a thing.

2009-4-2 11:53 AM

#51

buddy35
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 155128
Digest Posts 0
Credits 5378
Posts 4304
Registered 2008-1-12
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by petera at 2009-4-2 05:35
Two shills in tandem.Half of humanity does not believe the boxcutter conspiracy theory.But the shills
have to make a dishonest living.The idiot called voterigger refuses to use facts to defend the ...

You don't take these dumb Anglos seriously, do you?

Come on, petera, you are far too intelligent for these morons.

Your arguments will fall on deaf ears as these people are not interested in the truth.

They only believe what FOX, CNN and BBC bombard them with.

They are SHEEPLE!

2009-4-2 02:03 PM

#52

emucentral (JB)
Super Member
Rank: 6

UID 61916
Digest Posts 0
Credits 11396
Posts 10988
Registered 2005-4-4
Location Melbourne Oz 墨尔本- 澳洲
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by buddy35 at 2009-4-2 16:03
They are SHEEPLE! ...

The only "Sheeple" on this issue are those who have rushed on in to support a conspiracy theory which started as a joke and then progressed to get the original author of the video noticed.

It is so clearly misrepresentative, and fools like you fell for it!

2009-4-2 05:53 PM

#53

petera
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 138622
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3040
Posts 3026
Registered 2007-6-26
Status Offline

Sheeple

Buddy,I have no illusions about individuals like Emu,Voterigger and the like.They are I am certain paid
propagandists.There is no possibility of making them see the truth.As Upton Sinclair has said,It is hard
to make a man understand something when his salary depends on him not understanding it.

We can only hope to offer the facts to (non shill) people who visit this forum and hope to make a
difference.In this you have succeeded enormously,especially with the "What the British did" threads.I
hope you can continue to offer the truth to the public.

2009-4-3 05:31 AM

#54

vorgal78
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 119821
Digest Posts 0
Credits 547
Posts 531
Registered 2006-12-7
Location Adelaide Australia
Status Offline

This old chestnut ay? The future people, not the miserable past...

2009-4-3 08:21 AM

#55

emucentral (JB)
Super Member
Rank: 6

UID 61916
Digest Posts 0
Credits 11396
Posts 10988
Registered 2005-4-4
Location Melbourne Oz 墨尔本- 澳洲
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by petera at 2009-4-3 07:31
They are I am certain paid propagandists.There is no possibility of making them see the truth.As Upton Sinclair has said,It is hard to make a man understand something when his salary depends on him not understanding it. ...

I am open to the truth, but I reject stupidity and impossible fantasy.

As for your other fantasy, that I am paid to present an opinion here, well please let me know where to send the invoice.
I cannot believe anyone would pay anybody to shoot down your off the wall theories, in fact I sometimes wonder why I bother doing it for free !

2009-4-3 05:34 PM

#56

petera
Senior Member
Rank: 4

UID 138622
Digest Posts 0
Credits 3040
Posts 3026
Registered 2007-6-26
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by emucentral at 2009-4-3 17:34

I am open to the truth, but I reject stupidity and impossible fantasy.

As for your other fantasy, that I am paid to present an opinion here, well please let me know where to send the invoice ...

I am the one that rejects stupidity and impossible fantasy.As I have said before I SUSPECT that you are
paid for your efforts on this forum.But I KNOW that 9/11 was an inside job.

2009-4-6 02:27 PM

#57

emucentral (JB)
Super Member
Rank: 6

UID 61916
Digest Posts 0
Credits 11396
Posts 10988
Registered 2005-4-4
Location Melbourne Oz 墨尔本- 澳洲
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by petera at 2009-4-6 16:27
I am the one that rejects stupidity and impossible fantasy.As I have said before I SUSPECT that you are
paid for your efforts on this forum.But I KNOW that 9/11 was an inside job.

Your suspicion is wrong.

You have presented no evidence here to support what you claim to know.

I suspect that you are a paranoid schizophrenic and there's more evidence for that here, than there is for your wild conspiracy fantasies.

2009-4-6 04:13 PM

#58

mechanic
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 211674
Digest Posts 0
Credits 743
Posts 463
Registered 2009-3-16
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by emucentral at 2009-4-3 17:34

I am open to the truth, but I reject stupidity and impossible fantasy.

Are you open to this?

QUOTE:

"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September 11".

- Tony Blair (Times, July 17 2002)

All these scumbags knew the truth and did absolutely nothing, but rather allowed it to happen to give them an excuse to implement the PNAC blueprint!

[ Last edited by mechanic at 2009-4-6 05:30 PM ]

2009-4-6 05:28 PM

#59

mechanic
Junior Member
Rank: 3

UID 211674
Digest Posts 0
Credits 743
Posts 463
Registered 2009-3-16
Status Offline

QUOTE:

Originally posted by emucentral at 2009-4-2 11:53
They ignore the mathematical modelling of various universities on the collision, but believe a handful of "15 minutes of fame" loonies.

They conveniently ignore the fact that the original "conspiracy" video compilation was a deliberate fake itself.

They have seriously conflicting versions of the laws of physics wondering why the plane didn't do a cartoon style impact and then slide down the side of the building and simultaneously claim that "thin shell buckling" or whatever means the plane crumples.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA We expect this from shills like you. Did this come from the "reports" as well? Where are you findings based on?

Is this a first for the World Trade Towers just like it was a first that some magical magnetic force knocked them down? Lay off the pipe pal, you refuse to see what's right before your nose. Either that, or you know very well but your interests are elsewhere, and any excuse to invade a Muslim land is alright with you -- even at the expense of American lives. Truly sickening person you are.

The professionals:

"We had to use sophisticated tools to analyze the dust because this isn't just a typical explosive, RDX or CD4 or something
-- this is a highly engineered material not readily available to just anyone."

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Sc ... te_in_WTC_0404.html

2009-4-6 05:38 PM

#60

Printable Version | Email to Friend | Subscription | Favorites


Forum Rules	Feedback	Privacy