Author: greendragon

Duck - FUN questions for you to CHEW ON.   [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member CD top contributor in April 2015 Most Popular Member Medal of honor Medal of honor

Post time 2013-9-2 07:03:30 |Display all floors
robert237 Post time: 2013-9-2 04:46
In ships.

Yes Robbo, but you did not put any costings into sending via your internet business, if you had thought about it ( I know that is not easy for you ) you would have realised that the economics do not make sense

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member CD top contributor in April 2015 Most Popular Member Medal of honor Medal of honor

Post time 2013-9-2 07:03:59 |Display all floors
robert237 Post time: 2013-9-2 04:45
The laws in the USA are set up by the rich, for the rich.

US laws do not set transportation costs.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member CD top contributor in April 2015 Most Popular Member Medal of honor Medal of honor

Post time 2013-9-2 07:06:25 |Display all floors
robert237 Post time: 2013-9-2 04:31
Sure. The spoiled merchants that have licenses to steal from the people should be put in jail and  ...

Your lack of understanding knows no bounds, You do not need licences to import normal goods but you do need to pay THC, OF, Onward freight and many many more expenses both in China and the US

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Popular Member CD top contributor in April 2015 Most Popular Member Medal of honor Medal of honor

Post time 2013-9-2 07:07:31 |Display all floors
Kbay Post time: 2013-9-1 17:15
I have to agree with you on this.

British businessmen almost always conduct their ope ...

No, you miss the point, it is the merchandising, advertising and product choice that let Tesco down in China

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2015 Most Popular Member Medal

Post time 2013-9-2 07:46:03 |Display all floors
futsanglung Post time: 2013-9-1 15:03
Yes Robbo, but you did not put any costings into sending via your internet business, if you had th ...

You are brainwashed into believing the merchants and financiers deserve more than the people who
actually do all the work. Merchants and financiers are fast becoming obsolete.
Computers can do all their work much faster and much more accurately.
If capitalism promotes innovation and creativity then why aren't scientists and artists the richest people in a capitalist nation?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-9-2 11:26:57 |Display all floors
This post was edited by greendragon at 2013-9-2 13:43
LaughsatYou Post time: 2013-9-1 15:48
This doesn't make sense, if the work is menial then it is by definition not high income.

Where ...

From my observations

(1) American labour force between ages 45 to 65, the participation rate is less than 50%
<similar to American Female labour force between the age of 17 to 64 years>

(2) A survey of labour force age profile in a few major American corporation indicates youth or those below 45 years preferably employed. A good example is the employment profile of GAP, or KRUEGER supermarkets.

(3) The 401-K limits the TAX FREE investment savings to US$250,000 per employee <it appears>= meaning is to create the basic investment retirement income = US$15,000 above age of 50 years. So OLDER Americans CAN WORK part time or go FREELANCE <eg. consultancy>

PRETTY NEAT!
(4) Yes, of course the UPPER 50% percentile will have MORE SAVINGS beyond the 401-K, probably commercial properties, rental apartment-homes <quite substantial due to the "failure to launch" syndrome culture worry in the USA> ie. 2X or more to much more.

(5) To assist the AMERICAN ECONOMY to move into the EROTIC AGE - with the THIRD INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION productivity capacity > These SUPER SENIOR COHORTS, with household wealth of US$500,000 to up to US$5.0 million is CRITICAL. As is the need to have CORPORATIONS with BLUE CHIP standards to INVEST IN.

shall only talk about USA, China only!
for reason of NUT and CRAZY problems.

Not bad at all.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2013-9-2 11:33:30 |Display all floors
This post was edited by greendragon at 2013-9-2 15:35

It's rather INTERESTING, that the COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE of China has even brought with it .................

.............interest from the ESTABLISHMENTS of rival & collaborative states.

Just going through the largest firms in China, Malaysia, Singapore.
CARLYE group, KKR group or such often appears.

Indicates that they do understand the COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE of China.
- 200 million menial assembly workers.
- 400 giga electricity
- Scale and Efficient Logistics services
- Huge Commodity Resource availability
- 50 billion tonnes of TREATED water.

for only US$1,000 a worker = US$200 billion a year in surplus for China, and a Reinvestment of US$50-60 billion a year that makes up China annual surplus!

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.