- Registration time
- Last login
- Online time
- 0 Hour
- Reading permission
I've noticed a strong pattern in Western fiction super-heroes: they are not symmetrical - they are written to have super-strength, but not super-intelligence. Consider the Incredible Hulk; yes, as a man, he was written to be an intellectual genius, but still within the human range, someone like Niels Bohr, Isaac Newton, and Charles Darwin. But his strength was definitely not within the human range, but of a completely super-non-human entity.
And consider Superman; he was written to have an IQ of around 160, which is still within the human range (smartest human on record, the last time I checked, had an IQ of 200). But Superman sure did have physical powers not within the human range, but in the super-non-human range; he had more strength than millions of humans combined, was indestructible by any human weapon, he could shoot a laser beam out of his eyes, he could see through things, he could fly, and he could blow air out of his lungs with the force of a tornado.
Then there is the Western super-hero called Thor; he was written to have the IQ of an average human - IQ around 115. But he also had super-non-human strength; he was almost as strong as the Incredible Hulk, he could fly, and he could call upon the lightening to engulf his body and redirect it as a laser weapon with the aide of his metallic hammer weapon.
The same thing could be said of the myriad of other Western super-heroes: Spiderman, The Thing, Torch, Mighty Mouse, Iron Man, Captain America, Jedi Knights, Batman, The Green Lantern, X-Men, Silver Surfer, and so forth.
This reveals an interesting cultural fact: the West does not value intellectual augmentation, but only strength augmentation. And it provides a lesson for China by teaching them to be more symmetrical in their ideals: for China to value both super-intelligence and super-strength.