Author: chinsyou

Peaceful Co-Existence in Middle East   [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 2

Post time 2018-3-12 22:28:45 |Display all floors
seneca Post time: 2018-3-12 20:44
I know I can't beat you at that.

You can beat yourself on that again and again.
Truths always pack a punch.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2018-3-20 16:24:23 |Display all floors
Saul Post time: 2018-1-22 21:08
BULLSH1T

Power

No other power could sustain a 54 year cover up.
9/11 was an inside job.
No second plane.It was a bomb.Bomb in the other building.
You KNOW without a doubt the videos are fake,right ?!
Planes don't meld into steel and concrete buildings.They crash into them !!!!!!!
It's amazing how the building ate the plane !!!
Imagine those fragile wings cutting slots in massive steel columns !!!!!
How STUPID can they think the people are to believe that crap ??!!

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2018-3-22 08:37:15 |Display all floors
MisterLianghui Post time: 2018-1-30 10:56
This war in Syria has been going on for some years, and I never figured out what's the point and i ...
Also speaking of refugees, from the Western perspective, it's alla bout those who are used by the West or sided with the West, in the conflict/crisis/war, etc, and when they are needed to be evacuated for one reason or the other, then the West will raise the issue about 'REFUGEES' throughout the whole wide world.


How about 'The Refugees' from the other side, they couldn't care less.

And this had been the same throughtout history wherever the conflict the West is involved in.

[Basically they go into the region for their own interest, and then divide and conquer, divide and loot, pit one group against another, etc.]

  Millions of refugees in conflicts such as Vietnam and North Korea already perished due to aerial bombings and decade-long sanctions by the West.

  Like you said, they are the refugees from the other side, so the West couldn't care less.



                The West only sees through 'My way or Highway' mentality.



Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2018 Most Popular Member 2018 Most Popular Member 2016 Most Popular Member Medal Gold Medal

Post time 2018-3-22 09:56:09 |Display all floors
horatiokim Post time: 2018-3-22 08:37
The West only sees through 'My way or Highway' mentality.

You are an Asian living the good life of a virus embedded in its host organism and are badmouthing it; your compatriots back in Asia lead a hardscrabble hand-to-mouth existence and you don't help them. You are a traitor.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2018-3-28 04:48:57 |Display all floors





      Paradigm for Military Intervention  


   'China Is Studying Russia's Syrian Gambit'


  It has long been recognized that the closer alignment between Moscow and Beijing that goes back nearly three decades now provides each with ample political and diplomatic benefits. A less well explored aspect of the relationship could examine how these partners learn from one another in various domains, including in the crucial area of strategy. I have pointed out in this forumbefore that Chinese strategists have looked carefully at the war in Ukraine and the related Crimea annexation. This edition of Dragon Eye takes a close look at a Chinese assessment of Russia’s military intervention in Syria.

China’s interpretation of the Syrian War could turn out to be quite significant. I have recentlyargued in that Beijing could play a major role as one among several disinterested (and thus neutral) major powers in helping to fashion a diplomatic solution to the Gordian knot that is the Syria situation today. Such a role would be quite consistent with its ambitions to be a genuinely global power, providing global public goods for international security, and simultaneously facilitating the opening of vast trade corridors spanning Eurasia. Yet, there is a potentially darker side of China’s examination of the Syrian War. Indeed, there is a danger revealed in this late 2017study published in the journal Russian, East European and Central Asian Studies of the prestigious Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Put simply, that danger  is that Chinese strategists could conclude that the Russian war in Syria provides a valuable paradigm for possible future Chinese uses of force in distant theaters as “anti-terrorism military operations”.

This treatment of Russia’s war in Syria assesses the intervention as providing “numerous benefits” over and above speeding the destruction of ISIS. The intervention, according to this rendering, also significantly increased Russia’s standing in the world, altered the international system, increased Russians’ self-confidence, and also “seized the initiative in the struggle with the West". The author characterizes the Kremlin’s actions against Ukraine in 2014 as “resolute” but also notes that Russia suffered serious economic consequences as its trade fell off precipitously, so that the poverty level exceeded 15 percent of the Russian population, as related in this Chinese study. Thus, it is recognized that President Vladimir Putin made the ruling to intervene in force in Syria “… against the complex background of Russia confronting relatively difficult external and internal” circumstances.

It is noted that the Syrian War has afforded Moscow a “test of the results of its military building program in recent years and the results of reforms”. At the grand strategic level, the Chinese strategist suggests that the Kremlin views Syria as its “advanced post” near the gate of the eastern Mediterranean. Thus, the intervention is also interpreted as confronting NATO pressure against Russia’s southern flank. The piece, moreover, lays out the case for why Russia’s intervention could be legal, while the U.S.-led coalition “has not received either the agreement of the UN Security Council, nor the blessing of the Syrian government.” The Chinese assessment also sounds a bit naïve in wholeheartedly embracing the Kremlin’s explanation that Russia “…is only fighting terrorism, and is not supporting any particular political force …”

Addressing momentarily the arguments of skeptics, this analysis explains that “… for Russia, it is important that it not be drawn into a long war…” It is noted that the West has begun to talk about Russia’s “second Afghanistan”. But the author sees Moscow executing a “new type of war” relying on such methods as long distance precision strikes, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), surprise, and signals intelligence. Putin is cited approvingly as underlining the importance of preemptive attack against international terrorists. The piece suggests that Putin has the backing of a broad internal consensus in Russia to fight against terrorism, perhaps arising from the fact cited by the author that Russia is a country that has suffered greatly at the hands of terrorists. By relentlessly fighting against terrorism, the author explains, Moscow has been able to portray itself as “the real friend of the Arab World. Moreover, Russia’s Syrian War has, according to this Chinese assessment, “broken the West’s hegemonic position in the region.”


One of the most interesting sections of this paper is an evaluation of the information war about Syria that has been underway between Russia and the West. The author notes that the West led by the United States has used “all means available,” to unleash propagandistic attacks “to smear Russia to the highest degree with the hope of sparking a “‘colored revolution’ that overthrows Putin… The paper even goes so far as to tabulate (literally in a table) almost a dozen discreet efforts to paint Russia as a “wicked imperialist power” as a part of the “information war”.

Yet, this appraisal suggests that Russia has been winning this information war and reaping diplomatic benefits. It notes that the Syria operation has by now “successfully split the NATO camp" in that Turkey has gone from being an enemy to becoming a close friend of Russia. Coordination has been undertaken with countries, such as Israel, according to this analysis. Examples of Arab leaders thanking Putin are described. Moreover, the piece asserts that the Ukraine situation has taken on a much less urgent priority, as well.

In the end this Chinese assessment concludes without reservations that Russia’s “international position and influence has increased” in the wake of the Syria intervention. Syria is on a path toward stabilization, so it is claimed, and the Kremlin has also vanquished the opposition forces supported by the United States, to boot. The intervention amounts to a “great achievement”. Credit is even given to Russia for “alleviating the European refugee crisis.”

Many readers will be offended by this Chinese analyst’s evidently impudent conclusions. Undoubtedly, this reflects a one-sided appraisal and also the controlled nature of Chinese media reporting. Syria does not seem to be anywhere near on the verge of peace and Russia’s intervention appears to have had numerous problems, including obviouslyexcessive civilian casualties in Syria. Let’s also not forget theeconomic andhuman costs to Russia itself that are hardly negligible. After the last two decades of warfare in the Middle East that only seems to grow more chaotic, it seems a stretch bordering on absurdity to believe that any external power can successfully coax the region in a peaceful direction. The alternative of “disengagement” may well present the best alternative that allows local actors the autonomy to sort out their differences on their own.

Yet this Chinese assessment may well be more significant for what it says about China’s future foreign policy than anything it says about Syria, of course. As Beijing grasps to define its new role in the world, there will be many temptations for it to wield its new military power across the globe and especially in the vast, unstablearea where it is helping to build a “Belt and Road.” The paradigm adopted from Russia’s intervention in Syria of “fighting terror” and simultaneously building support and self-confidence at home could become nearly irresistible to the Chinese leadership. But deploying itsshiny military into situations far andwide around the world presents the road to perdition and could even significantly imperil the “Chinese dream” of national rejuvenation. Beijing would be much wiser to limit the scope of its expeditionary forces abroad and keep them cautiously under “bluehelmets.”


[source: Lyle J. Goldstein,



Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2018-3-30 08:18:18 |Display all floors
truthhurt Post time: 2018-3-28 04:48
Paradigm for Military Intervention  
   'China Is Studying Russia's Syrian Gambit'
  It h ...


    [source: Lyle J. Goldstein, Yahoo News, March 26, 2018]

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 4

Post time 2018-4-25 09:32:05 |Display all floors
horatiokim Post time: 2018-3-22 08:37
The West only sees through 'My way or Highway' mentality.
they are the refugees from the other side, so the West couldn't care less




In other word, faceless voice less souls that the West & their Western media couldn't care less or worth to mention about.

                          

The world is full of wolves wearing a sheep's mask and playing victims.

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.