Views: 47731|Replies: 20

Haley: UN Out of Options on North Korea [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2017-9-19 00:59:07 |Display all floors

Too little too late, Haily...

Time to accept reality for what reality truly is, which is: what France and the UK is to the West, Kim is to the East. Option 2, MUTUAL DISARMAMENT which the US, too, must also commit to or proliferation will continue to spread , i.e., to Iran, Saudi Arabia, African States, South East Asian Nations, the list goes on and on.

It's America's choice...


Haley: UN Out of Options on North Korea


Says She Is 'Perfectly Happy' With Having Pentagon Attack North Korea

Jason Ditz Posted on September 17, 2017Categories NewsTags Haley, North Korea, UN


US Ambassador Nikki Haley declared the UN Security Council to have “run out of options” for dealing with the “North Korea problem,” in comments made during an interview on CNN’s State of the Union show. She talked up a shift to unilateral US military options.



Nikki Haley

Haley insisted that the US has “a whole lot of military options on the table,” and that President Trump’s threat to give North Korea “fire and fury” was not an empty threat. She went on to say that if the US uses any military options “North Korea will be destroyed. And we all know that. And none of us want that.”

Despite saying she didn’t want that in this segment of her comments, the ambassador also said in the course of her comments she is “perfectly happy” to see the North Korea issued referred to the Pentagon to be solved by Defense Secretary James Mattis.


Since early spring, US officials have been threatening military action against North Korea multiple times a week. North Korean officials say their development of missiles is focused on finding an equilibrium at which it is no longer possible for the US to attack without risking a disastrous retaliation. Though many would argue the millions who would be killed in a war now would be enough of a deterrent, US officials continue to insist that the military option is a realistic one.







Putin's a killer. This was the claim made by Fox News journalist; Bill O'Reilly during his recent interview with Donald Trump. Trump's reply came in the form of a simple question. What, you think our country's so innocent?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2017-9-19 09:18:31 |Display all floors

Option 3:  Korea reunification; Seoul will have no say in this matter; details agreement to be worked out between Pyongyang and Seoul in exchange for a nuke free Korea; party of 3,  China, Russia, and US to overlook Korean peninsula remains nuke free.
Putin's a killer. This was the claim made by Fox News journalist; Bill O'Reilly during his recent interview with Donald Trump. Trump's reply came in the form of a simple question. What, you think our country's so innocent?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 1

Post time 2017-9-19 11:40:41 |Display all floors
edisonone Post time: 2017-9-19 09:18
Option 3:  Korea reunification; Seoul will have no say in this matter; details agreement to be work ...

Military option is the only option.  NATO most likely will do a surgical removal of Kim within 30 days.  Then North and South Korea will be joined together under South Korea's military.  They will finally be free, and no longer a threat to the world.

Then, China is next. .

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2017-9-19 13:48:57 |Display all floors
This post was edited by edisonone at 2017-9-18 21:50
Lexer Post time: 2017-9-18 19:40
Military option is the only option.  NATO most likely will do a surgical removal of Kim within 30  ...

Sadly, you have China (and Russia) as the variables in any surgical strike against the north...

You don't want to get into a brawl 『  major power to major power 』. China announced publicly 『 it will intervene if the north is attacked 』. China said she will not permit a war to happen in its front doorstep. As poor as China was in the 50's, we saw that happened. China intervened.

If a surgical strikes is as simple as you envision it, the US would've been all over Syria by now and 『 no fly zones forced on both countrues 』. Sadly, Vladimir said no to Syria.
.
Mark my word: J-10's, JH-7's, J-11's and J-16's, the whole works, will go at it with the f-14's, 15's, 16's, and 18 over the Korean peninsula if the north is attacked.

Trump is not as stupid as to hand north korea and maybe the south along with it to china but he will do exactly that if he attacks korea.





Putin's a killer. This was the claim made by Fox News journalist; Bill O'Reilly during his recent interview with Donald Trump. Trump's reply came in the form of a simple question. What, you think our country's so innocent?

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2017-9-19 14:31:10 |Display all floors
This post was edited by markwu at 2017-9-19 14:32

I don't know how a US stateswoman like Haley can say the US don't want NK destroyed and yet she is perfectly happy that in the absence of what she thinks are options, the next move is to militarily strike NK.  In the first place she's just the US ambassador to the UN and neither the UN nor its Security Council. There seems to be a gap in her thinking which is alarming for a US official voicing the US stand on a life-critical situation.  And in the second place, one wonders if the US speaks with a single voice. How can its diplomat assume that its defence arm will strike NK in the absence of what its diplomacy has neglected to do with conscience?  

She should ask herself if the countries are reversed, namely the US is NK and NK is the US, wouldn't she as spokesperson for NK be doing what Kim has been doing todate? Surely by any US definition of justice and right, the US can't be promulgating what's good for me need not be good for you if it makes you equate to me? Or can it?

Ms Haley, the only option is honest direct dialogue between the US and NK, not foxtrot charlietango a wordplay to the gallery with nary a thought for the millions of poor NKoreans who will surely die under the fire and fury of another US cataclysmic military storm; don't you even remember the aftermath and cost in human lives of your UN-unsanctioned invasion of Iraq?

All that said, by clearly recognizing the problem on hand is only between the US and NK, China has rightly kicked the ball back to the US to solve.

If the US next takes it out of China via trade, then that will only show it was never about NK in the first place.

If the US intends to next preemptively strike NK, then the US need be forewarned the peninsula and the region will be drawn into protracted conflict that will destroy the Pacific and thus the world economy upon which US businesses overwhelmingly depend.  Moreover, it will sour relations and incite terrorism for the rest of this century.

Ms Haley should take some meds and rethink what she is saying.  Because others like her with their fingers on triggers may well take the way she thinks not as some superior sanctimony that it is but as the green light to shoot to kill.

If she is still unconvinced, go read some of the threads in this forum. All have been laid out in stark systems-speak that her kind seem only to appreciate.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 1

Post time 2017-9-19 15:36:39 |Display all floors
edisonone Post time: 2017-9-19 13:48
Sadly, you have China (and Russia) as the variables in any surgical strike against the north...

Yo ...

You talk about China in the 1950s, but China back then was a different gene pool and culture.  We are talking about almost three reproductive generations.  Huge gene frequency shifts can occur in this amount of time.

China today is mostly a homosexual people who don't ever fight back.  The proof is massive: every time West sends their military into South China Sea, China say they gonna fight, but then they don't.  West clearly sees that China is chicken.  So, China won't do anything when West invades North Korea.  

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 1

Post time 2017-9-19 15:40:08 |Display all floors
edisonone Post time: 2017-9-19 13:48
Sadly, you have China (and Russia) as the variables in any surgical strike against the north...

Yo ...

You talk about China in the 1950s, but China back then was a different gene pool and culture.  We are talking about almost three reproductive generations.  Huge gene frequency shifts can occur in this amount of time.

China today is mostly a homosexual people who don't ever fight back.  The proof is ma$$ive: every time West sends their military into South China Sea, China say they gonna fight, but then they don't.  West clearly sees that China is chicken.  So, China won't do anything when West invades North Korea.  

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.