Author: 1584austin

Should the USA start worrying? [Copy link] 中文

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

2016 Most Valuable Member Glod Medal 2015 Most Valuable Member 2012's Best Moderator Medal of honor August's Best Contributor 2012 July's Best Contributor 2012 Gold Medal

Post time 2017-4-21 16:33:15 |Display all floors
seneca Post time: 2017-4-21 12:59
It seems both Donald Trump and Kim Jong-un are bluffers. The first dispatched an armada of warships  ...

They might be bluffers and they both might be mad but Kim is the one that will make the first idiotic move









Disclaimer
This post and any attachments to it, may be confidential and are intended solely for the individual to whom I replied

Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of Austin and do not necessarily represent those of the China Daily or the China Daily Forum.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Valuable Member Medal Gold Medal

Post time 2017-4-21 19:53:49 |Display all floors
1584austin Post time: 2017-4-21 16:33
They might be bluffers and they both might be mad but Kim is the one that will make the first idio ...

It seems Kim Jong-un is the better bluffer: if he fires an ICBM he cannot later claim his missile was temporarily diverted to Australia.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 2017-4-21 20:36:31 |Display all floors
It's not nuclear nor conventional all should be most worried about.

It's chemical. NK has a stockpile of 5,000 MT of chemical weapons and warpath annual production capacity at 12,000 MT.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

2016 Most Valuable Member Glod Medal 2015 Most Valuable Member 2012's Best Moderator Medal of honor August's Best Contributor 2012 July's Best Contributor 2012 Gold Medal

Post time 2017-4-21 20:57:27 |Display all floors
seneca Post time: 2017-4-21 19:53
It seems Kim Jong-un is the better bluffer: if he fires an ICBM he cannot later claim his missile  ...

Dusty better start ducking








Disclaimer
This post and any attachments to it, may be confidential and are intended solely for the individual to whom I replied

Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of Austin and do not necessarily represent those of the China Daily or the China Daily Forum.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

2016 Most Valuable Member Medal Gold Medal

Post time 7 DayEarlier |Display all floors
1584austin Post time: 2017-4-21 20:57
Dusty better start ducking

He can board the MSS VInson. There he will be safe, I think.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 6Rank: 6

Post time 4 DayEarlier |Display all floors
China, France, India, Russia, France, UK and US should get together to remove nukes from all other countries (currently Israel, North Korea and Pakistan). Nukes enable small countries to blackmail large ones. They should not be allowed beyond these 7. And having only 7 will make it easier for them to deescalate the nuke arms race.
Without World Government we are DOOMED.

Use magic tools Report

Rank: 8Rank: 8

Post time 4 DayEarlier |Display all floors
Ted180 Post time: 2017-4-25 04:19
China, France, India, Russia, France, UK and US should get together to remove nukes from all other c ...

By the same token nukes enable large powers to bully small powers. Nukes also enable small powers to protect themselves from larger powers if they have a vulnerable target of sufficient importance within range.

But generally speaking we should remove nukes from all nations, not just small powers.
(mostly harmless)

Use magic tools Report

You can't reply post until you log in Log in | register

BACK TO THE TOP
Contact us:Tel: (86)010-84883548, Email: blog@chinadaily.com.cn
Blog announcement:| We reserve the right, and you authorize us, to use content, including words, photos and videos, which you provide to our blog
platform, for non-profit purposes on China Daily media, comprising newspaper, website, iPad and other social media accounts.